NCT05657899

Brief Summary

Fractures of the elbow tip (olecranon) that leave the elbow joint stable but where the fracture ends are separated (Mayo type 2a and 2b) can be treated with pins and a metal wire (tension band wiring, TBW) or metal wiring alone (cerclage fixation, CF ). Previous studies have reported high re-operation and complication rates following TBW. The current study's hypothesis, based on two retrospective studies, is that CF of these fractures yield lower re-operation rates compared with TBW. The investigators also hypothesize that the overall complication rate will be lower following CF. The aim is to investigate this hypothesis in a randomized controlled trial. Patients that are 18 years or older with Mayo type 2a and 2b olecranon fractures at Skåne University hospital will be invited to the study. Participation is voluntary. Patients who accept participation will be randomly assigned to surgery by either TBW or cerclage fixation. Two hundred participants will be followed by physiotherapists for 36 months post-surgery assessing re-operations, complications, patient reported outcome, and elbow function.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
200

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
40mo left

Started Jan 2023

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress50%
Jan 2023Sep 2029

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 16, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 20, 2022

Completed
12 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2023

Completed
6.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2029

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2029

Last Updated

June 25, 2025

Status Verified

June 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

6.7 years

First QC Date

November 16, 2022

Last Update Submit

June 24, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Tension Band WiringCerclageSurgeryElbow injuriesForearm injuriesUlna fracturesPatient reported outcome measures

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Re-operation rate 1.5 months.

    Total re-operation rate of the operated elbow regardless of cause.

    Recorded at 1.5 months after intervention.

  • Re-operation rate 3 months.

    Total re-operation rate of the operated elbow regardless of cause.

    Recorded at 3 months after intervention.

  • Re-operation rate 12 months.

    Total re-operation rate of the operated elbow regardless of cause.

    Recorded at 12 months after intervention.

  • Re-operation rate 36 months.

    Total re-operation rate of the operated elbow regardless of cause.

    Recorded at 36 months after intervention.

Secondary Outcomes (21)

  • Complication rate 1.5 months.

    Recorded at 1.5 months after intervention.

  • Complication rate 3 months.

    Recorded at 3 months after intervention.

  • Complication rate 12 months.

    Recorded at 12 months after intervention.

  • Complication rate 36 months.

    Recorded at 36 months after intervention.

  • Complication severity 1.5 months.

    Recorded at 1.5 months after intervention.

  • +16 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (22)

  • Grip strength 0.5 months.

    Recorded at 0.5 months after intervention.

  • Grip strength 1.5 months.

    Recorded at 1.5 months after intervention.

  • Grip strength 3 months.

    Recorded at 3 months after intervention.

  • +19 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Cerclage

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Intervention by cerclage fixation.

Procedure: Cerclage fixation

Tension Band Wiring

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Intervention by tension band wiring

Procedure: Tension band wiring

Interventions

The intervention is by surgical open reduction and internal fixation of the fracture using two 1.0mm cerclage.

Cerclage

The intervention is by surgical open reduction and internal fixation of the fracture using a 1.0mm cerclage and two 1.6 mm k-wires as described in AO-guidelines.

Tension Band Wiring

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Sustained Olecranon type fracture of Mayo 2a or 2b
  • Seeking healthcare in at the Skåne University Hospital in Lund and Malmö, Sweden.

You may not qualify if:

  • Subjects unable to participate in follow up (for example subjects with active substance abuse, dementia, inability to communicate or understand the questionnaires or subjects living in other administrative healthcare regions).
  • Subjects unable to give informed written consent.
  • Subject where non operative treatment is indicated due to frailty or severe ongoing disease.
  • Fracture not operated within 14 days from the date the fracture was sustained.
  • Subjects with severe open fractures of Gustilo-Anderson class III
  • Subject with pathological fractures from metastatic disease.
  • Subject with simultaneous or previous severe injury to the same arm are excluded for patient reported outcome measures but included for all other outcomes.
  • Subjects with previously severe injuries to the same arm will be excludes for PROM analyses but included for reoperation and complication analyses.
  • Subjects operated by an orthopedic trauma surgeons that did not attended our education on the study and the interventions, unless surgery is supervised by an orthopedic surgeon that has attended the education the subject will not be excluded.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Dept. of Orthopaedics

Lund, Skåne County, 22242, Sweden

RECRUITING

Dept. of Orthopaedics

Malmo, Skåne County, 20502, Sweden

RECRUITING

Related Publications (6)

  • Wenger D, Cornefjord G, Rogmark C. Cerclage fixation without K-wires is associated with fewer complications and reoperations compared with tension band wiring in stable displaced olecranon fractures in elderly patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Oct;142(10):2669-2676. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04027-3. Epub 2021 Jul 8.

    PMID: 34236459BACKGROUND
  • Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996 Jun;29(6):602-8. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:63.0.CO;2-L.

    PMID: 8773720BACKGROUND
  • Gries MW. Safety professional's role as health educator expanding. Occup Health Saf. 1984 Feb:42-3. No abstract available.

    PMID: 6709254BACKGROUND
  • Williams N. The Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) questionnaire. Occup Med (Lond). 2016 Dec;66(9):757. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqw140. No abstract available.

    PMID: 27994082BACKGROUND
  • Ponzer S, Skoog A, Bergstrom G. The Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment Questionnaire (SMFA): cross-cultural adaptation, validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Swedish SMFA (SMFA-Swe). Acta Orthop Scand. 2003 Dec;74(6):756-63. doi: 10.1080/00016470310018324.

    PMID: 14763711BACKGROUND
  • Cornefjord G, Kostogiannis I, Rogmark C, Jerrhag D, Wenger D. The With Or Without Olecranon K-wire (WOW OK) Trial of tension band wire fixation versus cerclage fixation without K-wires in displaced stable olecranon fractures: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2023 Aug 29;24(1):559. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07566-9.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Olecranon FractureElbow InjuriesForearm InjuriesUlna Fractures

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Elbow FracturesArm InjuriesWounds and InjuriesFractures, Bone

Study Officials

  • Daniel Wenger, MD, PhD

    Department of Orthopedics, Skåne University Hospital and Lund University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Daniel Wenger, MD, PhD

CONTACT

Gustav Cornefjord, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The assessor of all outcome measures except assessment of a postoperative radiograph will be masked. When the radiograph is viewed the operative method will be apparent, but this assessor is not the same as for the other outcome measures.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 16, 2022

First Posted

December 20, 2022

Study Start

January 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2029

Last Updated

June 25, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations