Parental Involvement in Pain Reducing Measures
Pain Responses in Preterm Infants and Parental Stress Over Repeated Painful Procedures: a Randomized Pilot Trial.
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This pilot study was conceptualised to determine the feasibility of involving parents via facilitated tucking or observing during painful procedures and to measure change in parental stress and infant pain. An additional purpose of this pilot study was to determine the size of the cohort of preterm infants needed for a larger trial, the time, and resources required for recruitment and data collection.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 30, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 19, 2022
CompletedDecember 19, 2022
December 1, 2022
1.1 years
November 30, 2022
December 12, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
The main objective of this pilot study was to determine the feasibility of a larger, appropriately powered study
Feasibility assessment included recruitment rate (dependent on resources and in-/exclusion criteria)
1 year
Percentage of questionnaire completion
* Check percentage of questionnaires completed and withdrawals * Interview parents about the feasibility of participating three times
1 year
The pain and stress measurement over three time points were reviewed for feasibility
-The research team was also interviewed about acceptance, applicability and feasibility of the validated BPSN, the SCA over three time points
1 year
The active parental involvement over three time points were reviewed for feasibility
In semi-structured interviews, parents were asked about performing facilitated tucking or standing by as observers, acceptance, applicability and feasibility of the CSSQ and measurement over three time-points -The research team was also interviewed about active parental involvement
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The secondary interest of the study was to test for significant differences in parental stress between the two intervention and control group at three measurement points as well as infant pain.
1 year
Study Arms (3)
Two nurses executing facilitated tucking (FT)
NO INTERVENTIONUsual care
One parent watching passively
ACTIVE COMPARATOROne parent watching passively the 2 nurses executing FT
One parent actively involved
ACTIVE COMPARATOROne parent actively executing FT
Interventions
One parent watching a procedural painful intervention, two nurses executing facilitated tucking
One parent watching a procedural painful intervention and at the same time executing facilitated tucking
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Premature infants born at the NICU concerned
- Born between 24 0/7- 32 0/7 weeks of gestation, birthweight (bw) \<1250g
- Infant in need of s.c. erythropoietin
- Parents fluently speaking and writing in German
- Written informed consent by parents
You may not qualify if:
- Premature infant with an umbilical artery pH measurement \<7.00 or asphyxia
- Premature infant with life threatening malformations of the central nervous system
- Premature infant with intracranial haemorrhage (even if not present at the start of the study)
- Premature infant with any surgical intervention
- Parents with substance abuse (i.e., methadone, heroin, etc.), as mentioned in the electronic patient documentation (EPD)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Inselspital
Bern, 3010, Switzerland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Sandra Zwakhalen, Prof. Dr.
Fac. Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Health Services Research CAPHRI - University of Maastricht
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- The six NICU nurses involved were blinded to the purpose of the study, whereas the clinical nurse specialist (CNS) was not. Always three members of this research team conducted the pain assessment during the facilitated tucking or the observing by the parents. The other three members of the research team focused on the nurses' group. The CNS or the neonatologist provided information about the study to the parents, without stating its specific aim, instead referring in principle to the increased involvement of parents in pain management.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 30, 2022
First Posted
December 19, 2022
Study Start
October 1, 2019
Primary Completion
November 1, 2020
Study Completion
November 1, 2022
Last Updated
December 19, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- 1year
- Access Criteria
- Personal request
Data collection of pain assessment