NCT05654688

Brief Summary

The goal of this a randomized control trial is to carried out to examine Graston technique (GT) and muscle energy method (MET) impact on nonspecific neck pain compared to traditional physiotherapy treatment (TPT), This study aims to contrast between the outcomes of GT and MET on both pain intensity and functional disability in patients. Each participant was assigned a unique number, and then those numbers were randomly divided into three groups. Three groups were formed from a random selection of participants: GT Group (A): received 12 sessions of GT and (TPT) over the course of four weeks (three sessions per week). MET Group (B): received 12 sessions of MET treatment and (TPT) over a period of four weeks (three sessions per week). Control Group (C): received 12 sessions of traditional physiotherapy (TPT) over a period of four weeks (three sessions per week).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
42

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2022

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2022

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 8, 2022

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 16, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

December 16, 2022

Status Verified

November 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

December 8, 2022

Last Update Submit

December 8, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

GRASTON TECHNIQUE

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain intensity (VAS)

    Pain intensity (VAS) It was utilized to evaluate the degree of pain both before and after treatment. Subjects were asked to rate their pain on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain). Specifically, a line representing 10 centimeters was used as the scale's visual representation. Distance from zero to the respondent's mark was then used to approximate the sufferer's level of discomfort

    1 month

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Functional Disability (NDI)

    1 month

Study Arms (3)

Graston

EXPERIMENTAL

Graston technique and traditional physical treatment (control)

Other: graston and muscle energy technique

Muscle energy technique

EXPERIMENTAL

Muscle energy technique and traditional physical treatment

Other: graston and muscle energy technique

Traditional physical therapy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Traditional physical therapy treatment as heat application

Other: graston and muscle energy technique

Interventions

Graston technique (Gt) is a technique of mobilization of soft tissue using instruments which consider myofascial release instrument that has been reported to relieve pain, improve overall function, and increase range of motion. Muscle energy technique (MET) is a term composed of various types of active muscular relaxation and stretching procedures. The two cornerstone forms of MET are reciprocal inhibition and post isometric relaxation. In theory, reciprocal inhibition takes advantage of the neurological phenomena of muscular contraction, which results in an inhibitory effect on the antagonistic muscles.

GrastonMuscle energy techniqueTraditional physical therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • non specific neck pain

You may not qualify if:

  • Symptoms or signs of upper motor neuron disease, vestibulobasilar insufficiency, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
  • Cervical spine fracture. Cases of disc prolapse that have been diagnosed. prior cervical or thoracic spine surgery, (28).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Helwan University

Cairo, 11795, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • McCormack JR, Underwood FB, Slaven EJ, Cappaert TA. Eccentric Exercise Versus Eccentric Exercise and Soft Tissue Treatment (Astym) in the Management of Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy. Sports Health. 2016 May/Jun;8(3):230-237. doi: 10.1177/1941738116631498.

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: .Design: A randomized controlled experimental pre-post measurement. This study included forty two (30 males and 12 females) patients with NSNP aged between the ages of 40 and 60. Each participant was assigned a unique number, and then those numbers were randomly divided into three groups. Three groups were formed from a random selection of participants: GT Group (A): received 12 sessions of GT and (TPT) over the course of four weeks (three sessions per week). MET Group (B): received 12 sessions of MET treatment and (TPT) over a period of four weeks (three sessions per week). Control Group (C): received 12 sessions of traditional physiotherapy (TPT) over a period of four weeks (three sessions per week).
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Fellow of physical therapy Helwan University hospital, Egypt

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 8, 2022

First Posted

December 16, 2022

Study Start

April 1, 2022

Primary Completion

October 1, 2022

Study Completion

November 1, 2022

Last Updated

December 16, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations