Evaluation of the Levels of Pain, Discomfort, and Functional Impairment With Two Techniques of Retraction
Evaluation of Pain, Discomfort and Functional Impairment Associated With the Two-step Retraction Technique Anchored With Transpalatal Arches Versus the en Masse Retraction of Upper Anterior Teeth Anchored With Mini-implants: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
38
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Thirty-eight patients requiring extraction of maxillary first premolars will participate in the study. They will be divided randomly into two groups: an en-masse retraction group and a two-step group. In each group, anterior teeth retraction will be initiated after completion of the leveling and alignment phase via closed nickel-titanium coil springs applying 150 g of force per side, Mini-implants will be used as an anchor unit in the en-masse retraction group, and TPA in the two-step's retraction group. The levels of pain, discomfort, and functional impairments will be self-reported using a validated questionnaire with a 4-points Likert scale.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2013
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 13, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 3, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 24, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 7, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 15, 2022
CompletedDecember 15, 2022
December 1, 2022
1.3 years
December 7, 2022
December 14, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Change in the levels of discomfort or pain
The degree of pain and discomfort that patients feel will be determined using their answers to the following question (question 01): Do you have pain at the site of the mini-implants/transpalatal arch? ' The four-point scale will be adopted to measure the degree of pain.
Time 1: after 24 hours; Time 2: on the 3rd day; Time 3: on the 7th day; Time 4: on the 14th day; Time 5: after 1 month
Change in the levels of swelling
The degree of swelling that patient feel will be determined using their answers to the following question (question 02): ' Do you have a sense of swelling at the site of the mini-implants/transpalatal arch?' four-point scale will be adopted to measure the degree of swelling.
Time 1: after 24 hours; Time 2: on the 3rd day; Time 3: on the 7th day; Time 4: on the 14th day; Time 5: after 1 month
Change in the levels of chewing difficulties
The degree of chewing difficulties that patients feel will be determined using their answers to the following question (question 03): ' Do you have difficulty chewing ' four-point scale will be adopted to measure the degree of chewing difficulties.
Time 1: after 24 hours; Time 2: on the 3rd day; Time 3: on the 7th day; Time 4: on the 14th day; Time 5: after 1 month
Change in the speaking difficulties
The degree of any speech problems that patients feel will be determined using their answers to the following question (question 04): ' Do you avoid specific types of speech (e.g., on the phone) ' Four-point scale will be adopted to measure the degree of chewing difficulties.
Time 1: after 24 hours; Time 2: on the 3rd day; Time 3: on the 7th day; Time 4: on the 14th day; Time 5: after 1 month
Change in the cleaning difficulties
The degree of any cleaning difficulties that patients feel will be determined using their answers to the following question (question 05): ' Do you find it difficult to clean the appliance and oral cavity? ' Four-point scale will be adopted to measure the degree of chewing difficulties.
Time 1: after 24 hours; Time 2: on the 3rd day; Time 3: on the 7th day; Time 4: on the 14th day; Time 5: after 1 month
Study Arms (2)
Retraction with mini-implants
EXPERIMENTALMini-implants will be used as an anchor unit.
Retraction with transpalatal arches
ACTIVE COMPARATORTranspalatal arches will be used as an anchor unit.
Interventions
En masse retraction of upper anterior teeth will be applied where mini-implants will be used as an anchor unit. Anterior teeth retraction will be initiated after completion of the leveling and alignment phase via closed nickel-titanium coil springs applying 150 g of force per side.
Two-step retraction of upper anterior teeth will be applied where transpalatal arches (TPAs) will be used as an anchor unit. Teeth retraction will be initiated after completion of the leveling and alignment phase via closed nickel-titanium coil springs applying 150 g of force per side.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult healthy patients, Male and female, Age range: 17-27 years.
- Class II Division 1 malocclusion:
- Mild / moderate skeletal Class II (sagittal discrepancy angle 4\< ANB\<10)
- Overjet more than 5 mm.
- Normal overbite (more than 0 mm and less than 4 mm)
- Normal or increased anterior facial height (Clinically and then cephalometrically assessed using these three angles: mandibular/cranial base angle, maxillary/mandibular plane angle, and facial axis angle)
- well-aligned maxillary teeth with minimal crowding (≤ 4 mm according to Little's index), 3- Complete permanent dentition (except for the third molars).
- Existence of all the upper teeth (except third molars). 5- Good oral and periodontal health:
- Probing depth \< 4 mm
- No radiographic evidence of bone loss.
- Gingival index ≤ 1
- Plaque index ≤ 1
You may not qualify if:
- Medical conditions that affect tooth movement (corticosteroid, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), …)
- Presence of primary teeth in the maxillary arch
- Any craniofacial syndromes.
- Poor oral hygiene or Current periodontal disease:
- The patient had previous orthodontic treatment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Damascus
Damascus, Syria
Related Publications (5)
Oliver RG, Knapman YM. Attitudes to orthodontic treatment. Br J Orthod. 1985 Oct;12(4):179-88. doi: 10.1179/bjo.12.4.179.
PMID: 3863673BACKGROUNDHaynes S. Discontinuation of orthodontic treatment relative to patient age. J Dent. 1974 Jul;2(4):138-42. doi: 10.1016/0300-5712(74)90041-4. No abstract available.
PMID: 4531440BACKGROUNDFeldmann I, List T, Feldmann H, Bondemark L. Pain intensity and discomfort following surgical placement of orthodontic anchoring units and premolar extraction: a randomized controlled trial. Angle Orthod. 2007 Jul;77(4):578-85. doi: 10.2319/062506-257.1.
PMID: 17605489BACKGROUNDLehnen S, McDonald F, Bourauel C, Jager A, Baxmann M. Expectations, acceptance and preferences of patients in treatment with orthodontic mini-implants: part II: implant removal. J Orofac Orthop. 2011 Jul;72(3):214-22. doi: 10.1007/s00056-011-0026-3. English, German.
PMID: 21744200BACKGROUNDLehnen S, McDonald F, Bourauel C, Baxmann M. Patient expectations, acceptance and preferences in treatment with orthodontic mini-implants. A randomly controlled study. Part I: insertion techniques. J Orofac Orthop. 2011 Mar;72(2):93-102. doi: 10.1007/s00056-011-0013-8. English, German.
PMID: 21503849BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Salma Al-Sibaie, DDS,MSc
Department of Orthodontics, University of Al-Baath Dental School, Hamah, Syria
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mudar Mohammad Mousa, DDS
Department of orthodontics, Damascus University, Syria
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Mohammad Y. Hajeer, DDS,MSc,PhD
Department of orthodontics, Damascus University, Syria
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 7, 2022
First Posted
December 15, 2022
Study Start
January 13, 2013
Primary Completion
May 3, 2014
Study Completion
January 24, 2015
Last Updated
December 15, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share