Study Comparing Two Methods for the Treatment of Large Chondral and Osteochondral Defects of the Knee
Randomized Study Comparing Two Methods for the Treatment of Large Chondral and Osteochondral Defects of the Knee: Augmented Microfracture Technique vs. 3rd Generation of ACI
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The major objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the MACT versus the AMT for the treatment of large cartilage defects in patellofemoral and femorotibial injuries.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2026
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 7, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 15, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2028
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2032
March 12, 2026
March 1, 2026
1.5 years
December 7, 2022
March 10, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Patellofemoral joint-related function and quality-of-life are assessed using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS).
KOOS includes five subscales: symptoms, pain, activities of daily living, function in sport/recreation, and knee-related quality of life. A score in points for each subscale will be calculated, and it ranges from 0 (worst score) to 100 (best score). Self-assessment by the patient
Change from baseline to 3, 6 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months post-implantation in the patellofemoral joint.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Femorotibial joint-related function and quality-of-life are assessed using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS).
Change from baseline to 3, 6 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months post-implantation in the femorotibial joint.
Other Outcomes (3)
Self-reported physical pain and function are assessed by International Knee Documentation Committee score (IKDC)
Change from baseline to 3, 6 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months post-implantation in the patellofemoral and femorotibial joints.
Rate of implantation-associated complications: serious adverse events (SAEs) and serious adverse reactions (SARs)
Up to 60 months.
The cartilage repair is assesed by Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair
Change from baseline to 3, 6 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months post-implantation.
Study Arms (2)
Matrix-Assisted Autologous Chondrocytes Transplantation (MACT)
EXPERIMENTALMatrix-Assisted Autologous Chondrocytes Transplantation (MACT, also called third generation of autologous chondrocyte implantation) is based on the use of type I/III collagen membrane as a three-dimensional structural support on which autologous articular chondrocytes are seeded and cultured to form cartilage prior to implantation.
The Augmented Microfracture Technique (AMT)
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe Augmented Microfracture Technique (AMT, also called Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis or AMIC) which is part of a therapeutic continuum, combines a microfracture treatment with the application of a type I/III collagen membrane. The principle is to cover the microfractured area with a resorbable membrane to stabilize the formed blood clot in order to increase the concentration of mesenchymal stem cells and promote their differentiation into a repaired tissue.
Interventions
* A biopsy of healthy cartilage is taken from a non-weight bearing area of the knee joint during an arthroscopic procedure. * The biopsy is processed in the GMP accredited laboratory to isolate and amplify chondrocytes. * The cells are seeded and cultured on a collagen matrix (Chondro-Gide®, Geistlich Pharma) * The membrane is implanted and sutured onto the injured site.
This treatment combines the microfracture procedure with the application of a bilayer matrix of porcine type I/III collagen (Chondro-Gide, Geistlich Pharma) and the supplementation of autologous bone.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged between 15-50 years
- Symptomatic chondral and osteochondral defect, grade III and IV according to the ICRS classification, and size between 2.5 and 15 cm2
- Failure of a conservative treatment
- Patient in good general condition, documented by an ASA score ≤ 2 (American Society of Anesthesiologists)
- Patient considered compliant and able to participate in rehabilitation and pre- and post-operative follow-up
- Consent to participate in the study
You may not qualify if:
- All inflammatory and synovial pathologies
- Diffuse or mirror lesions
- An unfavorable biomechanical environment
- Obesity grade II or higher, with a BMI\>35 kg/m2
- Active smoking/ active drug dependency (hard drugs)
- Poor compliance
- The patient is already part of another clinical trial that may compromise the present study
- Vulnerable populations (except minors aged 15-18 years)
- Presence of open growth plate (15-18 years)
- Pregnancy or planned pregnancy during the study (MRI-related contra-indication)
- Proven allergy to penicillin and gentamicin (for MACT group) and porcine collagen (for both groups)
- \- Positive to HIV, HBV, HCV, syphilis.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Lee Ann LAURENT APPLEGATEcollaborator
- Virginie PHILIPPEcollaborator
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudoislead
Study Sites (2)
Hôpital Fribourgeois- HFR
Fribourg, Canton of Fribourg, 1708, Switzerland
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois - CHUV
Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, 1011, Switzerland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Robin MARTIN, MD
CHUV
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 7, 2022
First Posted
December 15, 2022
Study Start (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2032
Last Updated
March 12, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03