Preventing and Approaching Crises for Frail Community-dwelling Patients Through Through Innovative Care (PRACTIC)
PRACTIC
1 other identifier
interventional
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Preventing and approaching crises for frail community-dwelling patients through innovative care (PRACTIC). Participatory action research in a cluster randomised controlled trial. The primary purpose of this study is to test the effectiveness of an adapted version of a bio-psychosocial person centred model (TIME) to prevent and resolve crises for frail community-dwelling people receiving home care services. The investigators have formulated the following research questions (RQ): RQ1: Can the TIME model adapted for home care service, prevent, and resolve crises in frail people receiving home care services? RQ2: Which participant characteristics or organizational factors are associated with the effect of the TIME model? RQ3: What are the experiences of the users of home care services on how crises were approached during the trial?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2023
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 7, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 15, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 7, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 31, 2026
May 4, 2026
April 1, 2026
3.4 years
December 7, 2022
April 28, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in PGI (PRACTIC Goal-setting Interview) from baseline to 3 months
The primary outcome of the trial is the difference in the change between intervention and control group in individual goal achievement to resolve or reduce the challenges of the crises.
Change from baseline at 3 months using the PGI (scale of 1-10)
Secondary Outcomes (17)
Change in PGI (PRACTIC Goal-setting Interview)
at 6 moths
Change in symptoms (NPS)
at 3 months
Change in symptoms (NPS)
at 6 months
Change in quality of life measured
at 3 months
Change in quality of life measured
at 6 moths
- +12 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Interventions municipalities
EXPERIMENTALLocally adapted TIME (Targeted Interdisciplinary Model for Evaluation and Treatment of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms) intervention. Municipalities will be randomly assigned to either the intervention group or the control group. A biostatician will perform the randomisation procedure independently of the project management team and the municipalities. The project management team will provide the home care services in the municipalities with the randomisation and allocation results immediately following this procedure. The intervention will start with the educational sessions (described below) within one to two weeks after randomisation.
Control municipalities
NO INTERVENTIONCare as usual
Interventions
TIME is a manual-based, multicomponent programme that will include a rigorous assessment of the crises, one or more interdisciplinary case conferences and the testing and evaluation of customised treatment measures.This multicomponent interdisciplinary model consisting of three overlapping phases. First the assessment phase where the care staff and the physician collaborate in a comprehensive bio-psychosocial assessment. The second phase is the reflection phase with interdisciplinary case conferences based on principles from cognitive behavioural therapy and abc-method, where a customized treatment plan is developed. The abc-method from cognitive behavioural therapy is used as an analytic tool for the analyses of the complex challenges in the case conferences. In the third phase the treatment plan is implemented and evaluated systematically.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- in need of home care services
- a score ≥5 on the Clinical Frailty Scale (indicating mild to severe frailty)
- perceived by the home care service as being in an unstable situation with a high risk for acute institutionalisation or showing resistance to care.
You may not qualify if:
- \- expected short life expectancy (i.e., \<4 weeks).
- regular contact with the patient (i.e., at least once a week).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sykehuset Innlandet
Ottestad, Norway, Norway
Related Publications (3)
Vaeringstad A, Kirkevold O, Dalbak ETG, Myhre J, Feiring IH, Bergh S, Lichtwarck B. Development of the PRACTIC Goal Setting Interview (PGSI) for Frail Community-Dwelling Patients. Feasibility, Interrater Reliability and Content validity-a Mixed Methods Study. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Dec 12;19:4033-4050. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S557233. eCollection 2025.
PMID: 41424838DERIVEDDalbak ETG, Vaeringstad A, Lichtwarck B, Myhre J, Holle D, Bergh S, Kirkevold O. Preventing and approaching crises for frail community-dwelling patients through innovative care (PRACTIC): study protocol for a process evaluation of a complex intervention in home care service. Trials. 2025 May 28;26(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08876-w.
PMID: 40437640DERIVEDVaeringstad A, Dalbak ETG, Holle D, Myhre J, Kirkevold O, Bergh S, Lichtwarck B. PReventing and Approaching Crises for frail community-dwelling patients Through Innovative Care (PRACTIC): protocol for an effectiveness cluster randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2024 May 6;25(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08117-6.
PMID: 38711048DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Sverre Bergh, MD. PhD
Sykehuset Innlandet HF
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Specially trained nurses (data assessors) from the project's research centre who are not affiliated with the municipalities will, together with staff members in the home care services, assess patients' baseline characteristics before randomisation. These data assessors will after randomisation be blinded to the randomisation result. They will assess the effect of the intervention via telephone by interviewing the participants, the next of kin and the staff members who know the patient best, at three months and six months after baseline assessments.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 7, 2022
First Posted
December 15, 2022
Study Start
January 7, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 31, 2026
Last Updated
May 4, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- De-identified individual participant data and supporting documents are available from 6 December 2024 and will remain available until 1 April 2031.
- Access Criteria
- De-identified participant data will be made available upon reasonable request from reseachers to the members of the research team at the Research Centre for Age-related Functional Decline and Disease (AFS), Innlandet Hospital Trust.
Collaborating partners in the study will not have access to the individual participant data. The data collected in the study are not publicly available. De-identified participant data will be made available upon reasonable request to the members of the research team at the Research Centre for Age-related Functional Decline and Disease (AFS), Innlandet Hospital Trust.