Comparison of the in Vivo Stability of 2 Cementless TKA Designs
ClessTKA
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to analyze the stability of a cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) over time and compare it to a well-documented implant in patients with knee osteoarthritis. The main aim is to answer if there is a difference in stability over time as a measure of long time survivorship in these 2 implants. 50 participants will be randomly allocated to receive either the Triathlon Tritanium (Stryker) or the Global Medacta Knee Sphere (GMK Sphere, Medacta) 3D printed cementless TKAs.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis
Started Dec 2022
Longer than P75 for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 23, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 6, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 14, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 25, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2033
August 27, 2024
August 1, 2024
5.6 years
November 23, 2022
August 26, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
CTMA Maximum Total Translation
The highest total translation on the implant at each time point
Up to 2 years
CTMA Maximum Total Translation
The highest total translation on the implant at each time point
Up to 5 years
Secondary Outcomes (12)
CTMA Total rotation
Up to 2 years
CTMA Total rotation
Up to 5 years
CTMA Total translation
Up to 2 years
CTMA Total translation
Up to 5 years
The Forgotten Joint Score (FJS)
Up to 2 years
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (3)
BMI
Preoperative
Operation time
Intraoperative
Axial alignment of the tibia
Up to 1 week postoperative
Study Arms (2)
Control group
EXPERIMENTALCementless Triathlon Tritanium 3D printed TKA
Study group
EXPERIMENTALGMK Sphere cementless 3D printed TKA
Interventions
Total knee artroplasty with medial parapatellar incision and mechanical alignment without navigation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients referred to Kristiansund Hospital for primary total knee replacement surgery for osteoarthritis with Kellgren \& Lawrence grade 3 or 4
You may not qualify if:
- Preoperative severe deformity (Hip-Knee-Ankle angle of \>5 (valgus) or \<-15 degrees (varus) on a full-length leg image at weight bearing
- Preoperative flexion contracture more than 15°
- Less than 50 and more than 75 years of age at the time of surgery
- Use of walking aids because of other musculoskeletal and neuromuscular problems
- Preoperative diagnosis other than osteoarthritis or avascular necrosis (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis, tumours)
- Revision arthroplasty
- Obesity with BMI\>35 g/m2
- Lateral collateral ligament deficient knee
- Previous knee joint infection
- Cognitive dysfunction or severe psychiatric disorders.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Helse Møre og Romsdal HFlead
- Oslo University Hospitalcollaborator
- Medacta International SAcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Kristiansund Hospital, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust
Kristiansund, Møre and Romsdal, 6508, Norway
Related Publications (7)
Nilsson KG, Henricson A, Norgren B, Dalen T. Uncemented HA-coated implant is the optimum fixation for TKA in the young patient. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Jul;448:129-39. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000224003.33260.74.
PMID: 16826107BACKGROUNDPrudhon JL, Verdier R. Cemented or cementless total knee arthroplasty? - Comparative results of 200 cases at a minimum follow-up of 11 years. SICOT J. 2017;3:70. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2017046. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
PMID: 29232186BACKGROUNDNo authors listed. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). Hip, Knee & Shoulder Arthroplasty: 2020 Annual Report, Adelaide; AOA, 2021: https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/documents/10180/712282/Hip%2C+Knee+%26+Shoulder+Arthroplasty/bb011aed-ca6c-2c5e-f1e1-39b4150bc693 (date assessed October 29 2022).
BACKGROUNDBragonzoni L, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Bontempi M, Roberti di Sarsina T, Cardinale U, Alesi D, Iacono F, Neri MP, Zaffagnini S. New design total knee arthroplasty shows medial pivoting movement under weight-bearing conditions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Apr;27(4):1049-1056. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5243-5. Epub 2018 Oct 27.
PMID: 30368560BACKGROUNDPetersen ET, Rytter S, Koppens D, Dalsgaard J, Hansen TB, Andersen MS, Stilling M. Medial congruent polyethylene design show different tibiofemoral kinematics and enhanced congruency compared to a standard symmetrical cruciate retaining design for total knee arthroplasty-an in vivo randomized controlled study of gait using dynamic radiostereometry. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Mar;31(3):933-945. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07036-w. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
PMID: 35809105BACKGROUNDBroden C, Sandberg O, Olivecrona H, Emery R, Skoldenberg O. Precision of CT-based micromotion analysis is comparable to radiostereometry for early migration measurements in cemented acetabular cups. Acta Orthop. 2021 Aug;92(4):419-423. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1906082. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
PMID: 33821746BACKGROUNDBroden C, Olivecrona H, Maguire GQ Jr, Noz ME, Zeleznik MP, Skoldenberg O. Accuracy and Precision of Three-Dimensional Low Dose CT Compared to Standard RSA in Acetabular Cups: An Experimental Study. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:5909741. doi: 10.1155/2016/5909741. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
PMID: 27478832BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Frank-David Øhrn, MD, PhD
Møre og Romsdal Hospital Trust
- STUDY CHAIR
Stephan M Röhrl, MD, PhD
Oslo University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Double blinded study (patient and research nurse)
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 23, 2022
First Posted
December 14, 2022
Study Start
December 6, 2022
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 25, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2033
Last Updated
August 27, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR
- Time Frame
- Immediately following publication and 5 years
- Access Criteria
- Researchers that want access to data
Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification