Study of Phantom Limb Pain Using Peripheral Nerve and Spinal Cord Stimulation
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation and Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Phantom Limb Pain After Upper Limb Amputation for Phantom Limb Pain Suppression and Development of the Biomarkers
1 other identifier
interventional
10
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of neuromodulation for relief of phantom limb pain (PLP) using peripheral nerve (PNS) and spinal cord (SCS) stimulation with implantable electrodes. The researchers expect that PLP in patients with upper limb amputation will be relieved by peripheral nerve and the spinal cord stimulation. The possibility of finding EEG biomarkers for phantom pain will be explored.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 19, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 14, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2025
CompletedDecember 14, 2022
December 1, 2022
3.8 years
November 19, 2022
December 6, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Determining the effectiveness of phantom pain suppression based on the Test Stimulation Diary
The patient completes a Test Stimulation Diary at the end of each day, noting the location of phantom pain and the percentage of pain reduction during stimulation.
up to 1 month
Change according to the scale of the DN4 Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire
The DN4 Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire defines the neuropathic nature of pain with a point of 4 to 10.
baseline and up to 1 month
Change according to the scale of the PainDetect questionnaire
The PainDetect questionnaire reflects all possible parameters of pain and allows us to very clearly track the picture of the pain syndrome in dynamics. The score is made in the range from 0 (best score) to 38 (worst score) points.
up to 1 month
Change in relative power of slow frequencies (alpha and theta rhythms) on the EEG with the neurostimulator on/off and eyes open/closed.
The general analysis pipeline includes the calculation of the normalized power spectral density, after which the average power of the alpha rhythm is divided by the average power of the theta rhythm.
up to 1 month
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change according to the SF-36 scale "Quality of Life Assessment"
baseline and up to 1 month
Change according to the Trinity Amputation and Prosthetics Research Scale (TAPES-R)
baseline and up to 1 month
Study Arms (1)
Patients who underwent the upper limb amputation and have phantom limb pain
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
PNS electrodes are implanted in the area of peripheral nerves of the amputated limb. During phantom pain mapping, multichannel electrodes are used to stimulate peripheral nerves at different sites in the stump. Stimulation turns on sequentially at different stimulation sites; sites are selected where pain is most effectively suppressed. These sites are assigned to the patient for daily modulation.
SNS electrodes are implanted in the area of targeted peripheral nerves in the amputated limb. During phantom pain mapping, multichannel electrodes are used to stimulate the spinal cord at different sites in the cervical thickening (C5-T1). Stimulation starts at a specific site at a frequency of 1 Hz and increases by 0.1 Hz until the patient no longer feels phantom pain. Stimulation turns on sequentially at different stimulation sites; sites are selected where pain is most effectively suppressed. These sites are assigned to the patient for daily modulation.
This procedure uses the method of electroencephalography (EEG). EEG signals are recorded during the entire experiment. First, the patient is recorded at rest with stimulator on (PNS/SCS) with eyes open and then closed, in the stimulator off state (eyes open, then closed) when patient's pain returns to its preoperative state. The stimulation is then turned back on to the original level of pain suppression. The moments of pain suppression are fixed by marking.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with implanted neuromodulation devices.
- Amputation of the upper limb at the level of the forearm.
- Age ranges from 18 to 65 years old.
- The duration from the moment of amputation is from 6 months.
- The presence of persistent chronic pain syndrome is from 4 to 10 points according to the Visual Analogue Scale
- Absence of pregnancy at the time of implantation, confirmed by a pregnancy test.
You may not qualify if:
- The presence of severe somatic pathology
- The presence of mental illness
- The presence of a gross orthopedic deformity in the limb above the amputation level.
- The presence of oncology.
- The presence of epilepsy.
- Complications after a traumatic brain injury or stroke.
- Purulent - septic pathology.
- Drug addiction.
- Congenital malformation of the upper limb.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Artur Biktimirovlead
Study Sites (1)
Far Eastern Federal University (FEFU)
Vladivostok, Primorskiy (Maritime) Kray, 690922, Russia
Related Publications (11)
Knotkova H, Hamani C, Sivanesan E, Le Beuffe MFE, Moon JY, Cohen SP, Huntoon MA. Neuromodulation for chronic pain. Lancet. 2021 May 29;397(10289):2111-2124. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00794-7.
PMID: 34062145BACKGROUNDSchiefer M, Tan D, Sidek SM, Tyler DJ. Sensory feedback by peripheral nerve stimulation improves task performance in individuals with upper limb loss using a myoelectric prosthesis. J Neural Eng. 2016 Feb;13(1):016001. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/13/1/016001. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
PMID: 26643802BACKGROUNDGraczyk EL, Schiefer MA, Saal HP, Delhaye BP, Bensmaia SJ, Tyler DJ. The neural basis of perceived intensity in natural and artificial touch. Sci Transl Med. 2016 Oct 26;8(362):362ra142. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5187.
PMID: 27797958BACKGROUNDMekhail N, Levy RM, Deer TR, Kapural L, Li S, Amirdelfan K, Hunter CW, Rosen SM, Costandi SJ, Falowski SM, Burgher AH, Pope JE, Gilmore CA, Qureshi FA, Staats PS, Scowcroft J, Carlson J, Kim CK, Yang MI, Stauss T, Poree L; Evoke Study Group. Long-term safety and efficacy of closed-loop spinal cord stimulation to treat chronic back and leg pain (Evoke): a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2020 Feb;19(2):123-134. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30414-4. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
PMID: 31870766BACKGROUNDOrtiz-Catalan M, Mastinu E, Sassu P, Aszmann O, Branemark R. Self-Contained Neuromusculoskeletal Arm Prostheses. N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 30;382(18):1732-1738. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1917537.
PMID: 32348644BACKGROUNDTan DW, Schiefer MA, Keith MW, Anderson JR, Tyler J, Tyler DJ. A neural interface provides long-term stable natural touch perception. Sci Transl Med. 2014 Oct 8;6(257):257ra138. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3008669.
PMID: 25298320BACKGROUNDSchiefer MA, Graczyk EL, Sidik SM, Tan DW, Tyler DJ. Artificial tactile and proprioceptive feedback improves performance and confidence on object identification tasks. PLoS One. 2018 Dec 5;13(12):e0207659. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207659. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 30517154BACKGROUNDPetrini FM, Valle G, Strauss I, Granata G, Di Iorio R, D'Anna E, Cvancara P, Mueller M, Carpaneto J, Clemente F, Controzzi M, Bisoni L, Carboni C, Barbaro M, Iodice F, Andreu D, Hiairrassary A, Divoux JL, Cipriani C, Guiraud D, Raffo L, Fernandez E, Stieglitz T, Raspopovic S, Rossini PM, Micera S. Six-Month Assessment of a Hand Prosthesis with Intraneural Tactile Feedback. Ann Neurol. 2019 Jan;85(1):137-154. doi: 10.1002/ana.25384. Epub 2018 Dec 24.
PMID: 30474259BACKGROUNDRaspopovic S, Capogrosso M, Petrini FM, Bonizzato M, Rigosa J, Di Pino G, Carpaneto J, Controzzi M, Boretius T, Fernandez E, Granata G, Oddo CM, Citi L, Ciancio AL, Cipriani C, Carrozza MC, Jensen W, Guglielmelli E, Stieglitz T, Rossini PM, Micera S. Restoring natural sensory feedback in real-time bidirectional hand prostheses. Sci Transl Med. 2014 Feb 5;6(222):222ra19. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3006820.
PMID: 24500407BACKGROUNDSoghoyan G, Biktimirov AR, Piliugin NS, Matvienko Y, Kaplan AY, Sintsov MY, Lebedev MA. Restoration of natural somatic sensations to the amputees: finding the right combination of neurostimulation methods. Front Neurosci. 2024 Nov 25;18:1466684. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1466684. eCollection 2024.
PMID: 39654645DERIVEDSoghoyan G, Biktimirov A, Matvienko Y, Chekh I, Sintsov M, Lebedev MA. Peripheral nerve stimulation enables somatosensory feedback while suppressing phantom limb pain in transradial amputees. Brain Stimul. 2023 May-Jun;16(3):756-758. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.04.017. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
PMID: 37100202DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Far Eastern Federal University
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 19, 2022
First Posted
December 14, 2022
Study Start
November 1, 2021
Primary Completion
September 1, 2025
Study Completion
November 1, 2025
Last Updated
December 14, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-12