NCT05649735

Brief Summary

To evaluate and compare the efficacy, activity and tolerability of a vaginal ova formulation containing tindalised cultures (Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus plantarum, Streptococcus thermophilus) (LOGUSGYN/CANDIDEP OVULES) and in vaginal lavage (LOGUSGYN/CANDIDEP LAVENDER) in patients with nonspecific vulvovaginitis compared to sterile saline-based vaginal irrigation (AELAV PURLING). The primary efficacy endpoint is based on the percentage of patients with therapeutic success, defined as resolution of signs and symptoms of vaginitis (total symptom score \<4) at the end of treatment. For the overall assessment of clinical outcomes (resolution, improvement or failure): outcomes at the end of treatment will be considered. The treatment outcome will be measured after 5 days (V2) and after 10 days of treatment (V3) for groups A, B and C Also for group D (later, with a second randomisation, divided into groups E and F) the primary endpoint will be the same as for groups A, B, C at the visit after 30 days of treatment (V4) The treatment outcome will be measured after 5 days (V2) (after 10 days (V3) of treatment the SPT result will be re-evaluated and will be included in the secondary endpoints). The evolution of signs and symptoms of vaginitis is defined as the percentage of patients with resolution (overall score 4), improvement (decrease in overall score from baseline of 50%) or failure (decrease in overall score \<50%). Ninety-one adult female subjects (aged 18-65 years) with a diagnosis of vulvovaginitis and the presence of at least two subjective symptoms and two objective signs (at least moderate) of vaginal inflammation were recruited. The study was planned with a randomised, controlled, parallel-group sequential design to test a vaginal ova formulation containing tindalised cultures (Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus plantarum, Streptococcus thermophilus) (LOGUSGYN/CANDIDEP OVULES) and vaginal douches (LOGUSGYN/CANDIDEP LAVENDER) in patients with non-specific vulvovaginitis to control treatment (AELAV PURLING- vaginal irrigation with sterile saline). The sequential design involves a first phase with randomisation into 4 groups (A, B, C, D) followed by a second randomisation of group D (patients with vulvovaginitis and positive for HPV at PAP test) into two subgroups (E and F). The primary efficacy endpoint is based on the resolution of vulvovaginitis signs and symptoms (total SPT symptom score at the end of the first Phase I treatment period (after 5 days of treatment) for groups A, B, C and D). For the overall assessment of clinical outcomes (resolution, improvement or failure): results at the end of treatment after 10 days (V3) will be considered as secondary endpoints. Phase II will always have the resolution of vulvovaginitis signs and symptoms (total SPT symptom score f4 at the end of treatment at 30 days (V4)) as the primary endpoint, compared to Phase I results in group D. The protocol involves 4 visits per patient over 10 days for the groups. For groups E and F only the visit at V4 after 30 days of treatment. At visit 1 (0 days, baseline visit), patients will have to sign a written informed consent before performing any procedure. Subjects will be screened for study eligibility, verifying that all inclusion criteria and no exclusion criteria are met. At V1, the investigator will collect demographic and anamnestic data and perform a vaginal swab; in case of specific growth of pathogenic organisms, patients will be treated after the 5-day follow-up visit with antibiotics or antimycotics according to the result of the antibiogram. Delivery of the information note to the GP and the study and treatment information sheet to the patient. The investigator will then assess subjective symptomatology (burning, pain, itching, vaginal dryness, dyspareunia and dysuria) Objective symptomatology (leucorrhoea, vulvar erythema, vulvar oedema and presence of abrasion/erosion) Vaginal PH PAP test. Patients will report their degree of satisfaction with the treatment using a 5-point semiquantitative scale. Patients will be interviewed to monitor adherence to the study protocol and symptom trends during the 10-day study period (groups A, B, C and D) and at 30 days (groups E, F) The safety and tolerability of the treatments will be assessed by reporting any local and anticipated adverse events

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
91

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2020

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 17, 2020

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 15, 2021

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 13, 2022

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 16, 2022

Completed
28 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 14, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

December 14, 2022

Status Verified

November 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

November 16, 2022

Last Update Submit

December 5, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Therapeutic success

    resolution of signs and symptoms of vaginitis (total symptom score \<4) at the end of treatment

    After 5 days (V2)

  • Therapeutic success

    resolution of signs and symptoms of vaginitis (total symptom score \<4) at the end of treatment

    After 10 days of treatment (V3) for groups A, B, C and D.

  • The evolution of signs and symptoms of vaginitis

    the percentage of patients with resolution (overall score ≤ 4), improvement (decrease in overall score from baseline ≥ 50%), or failure (decrease in overall score \<50%)

    After 5 days (V2)

  • The evolution of signs and symptoms of vaginitis

    the percentage of patients with resolution (overall score ≤ 4), improvement (decrease in overall score from baseline ≥ 50%), or failure (decrease in overall score \<50%)

    After 10 days of treatment (V3) for groups A, B, C and D.

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • the change from the semi-quantitative baseline score, expressed both for individual signs and symptoms and for their sum (total symptom score, TSS)

    After 5 days (V2)

  • the change from the semi-quantitative baseline score, expressed both for individual signs and symptoms and for their sum (total symptom score, TSS)

    After 10 days of treatment (V3) for groups A, B, C and D.

  • Vaginal pH

    After 10 days of treatment (V3) for groups A, B, C and D.

  • Evaluation of the pap test

    After 5 days (V2)

  • Evaluation of the pap test

    After 10 days of treatment (V3) for groups A, B, C and D.

Study Arms (4)

GROUP A- LOGUSGYN/CANDIDEP vaginal ovules,

EXPERIMENTAL

At baseline, eligible and PAP test negative patients were randomly assigned to receive LOGUSGYN/CANDIDEP vaginal ovules treatment for 10 consecutive days.

Device: Logusgyn ovules

GROUP B- LOGUSGYN/CANDIDEP lavander

EXPERIMENTAL

At baseline, eligible and PAP test negative patients were randomly assigned to receive LOGUSGYN/CANDIDEP lavender treatment for 10 consecutive days.

Device: Logusgyn Lavander

GROUP C- vaginal irrigation with sterile saline AELAV PURLING

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

At the baseline visit, eligible and PAP test negative patients were randomly assigned to receive the vaginal irrigation with sterile saline AELAV PURLING treatment for 10 consecutive days.

Other: Placebo

GROUP D- Patients pap test positive

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients eligible at baseline and PAP test positive will be assigned to GROUP D and treated for 10 days with sterile saline-based vaginal irrigation (Placebo/control group) AELAV PURLING- Subsequently after the initial 10-day treatment they will be randomised into two further groups, E and F, and treated for 30 days with: GROUP E- LOGUSGYN/CANDIDEP vaginal ova, GROUP F- LOGUSGYN/CANDIDEP vaginal ova, + LOGUSGYN/CANDIDEP lavage, and treated for 30 days with: GROUP E- LOGUSGYN/CANDIDEP vaginal ova, GROUP F- LOGUSGYN/CANDIDEP vaginal ova, + LOGUSGYN/CANDIDEP douche

Device: Logusgyn ovulesDevice: Logusgyn Lavander

Interventions

LOGUSGYN ovules is a CE certified Class I medical device, according to MD Directive 93/42 / EEC as amended by Directive 2007/47 / EC, manufactured by ERBOZETA S.p.a. designed for its intended use. It consists of a vaginal ova dressing for topical use containing tindalised cultures, Guar fibre, Lactic acid and Calendula. It is supplied in a container with 10 vaginal ova. For this study, LOGUSGYN/CANDIDEP ova/wash will be packaged according to good manufacturing practice and local regulatory requirements and will be labelled in accordance with local regulatory requirements and according to GMP Annex 13.

GROUP A- LOGUSGYN/CANDIDEP vaginal ovules,GROUP D- Patients pap test positive

LOGUSGYN lavage is a CE certified class I medical device, according to MD Directive 93/42 / EEC as amended by Directive 2007/47 / EC, manufactured by ERBOZETA S.p.a. designed for its intended use. It consists of a gynaecological lavage dressing containing Chlorhexidine 0.2% and tindalised ferments, lactic acid, bisabolol. It is supplied in a container with 5 vaginal douches. For this study, LOGUSGYN/CANDIDEP ova/wash will be packaged according to good manufacturing practice and local regulatory requirements and will be labelled in accordance with local regulatory requirements and according to GMP Annex 13.

GROUP B- LOGUSGYN/CANDIDEP lavanderGROUP D- Patients pap test positive
PlaceboOTHER

Sterile saline solution

Also known as: Vaginal irrigation with sterile saline AELAV PURLING
GROUP C- vaginal irrigation with sterile saline AELAV PURLING

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Signed written informed consent
  • Subjects diagnosed with vulvovaginitis
  • Presence of at least two subjective symptoms and two objective signs (at least moderate) of vaginal inflammation. Vaginal inflammation will be assessed on six subjective symptoms (burning, pain, itching, vaginal dryness, dyspareunia and dysuria and four objective signs (leucorrhoea, vulvar erythema, vulvar oedema and presence of abrasion/erosion)
  • The patient is able to read and understand the language and content of the study material, understand the requirements for follow-up visits, willing and able to provide information at scheduled assessments and willing and able to fulfil the requirements of the study
  • PAP positive patients were allocated to group D

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who do not sign the informed consent form
  • Other gynaecological diseases (in addition to cervicovaginitis), immunosuppressive diseases (i.e. HIV infection) or who are immunocompromised for reasons such as corticosteroid therapy, chemotherapy, anti-angiogenic agents or immunosuppressants
  • History of connective tissue disease, e.g. systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis, Sjogren's syndrome or mixed connective tissue disease
  • Known allergy to any component of the device
  • Subjects who are unable to understand informed consent or who have a high probability of noncompliance with study procedures and/or noncompletion of the study in the judgment of the investigator
  • Time between last day of last menstruation and baseline visit\> 16 days or ≤5 days

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ospedale San Giovanni Moscati

Aversa, Campania, 81031, Italy

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Vaginosis, Bacterial

Interventions

Vaginal Douching

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Bacterial InfectionsBacterial Infections and MycosesInfectionsVaginitisVaginal DiseasesGenital Diseases, FemaleFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesGenital Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Therapeutic IrrigationInvestigative Techniques

Study Officials

  • Francesco Forleo, yes

    Erbozeta

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Chief

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 16, 2022

First Posted

December 14, 2022

Study Start

July 17, 2020

Primary Completion

December 15, 2021

Study Completion

August 13, 2022

Last Updated

December 14, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-11

Locations