NCT05643222

Brief Summary

This study aimed to relate and compare the performance of 4 types of red-tinted contact lenses (CL) with the Total Error Score (TES) from the Farnsworth-Munsell 100 Hue test on colour deficient subjects. Only 6 subject with colour vision defect was tested in this study.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
6

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2020

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 20, 2020

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 30, 2021

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 31, 2021

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 21, 2022

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 8, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

December 8, 2022

Status Verified

December 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

November 21, 2022

Last Update Submit

December 1, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Anomalous TrichromatsColor Vision DefectContact Lenses

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • The lens which gives the best result in TES value

    The highest TES value scored showed higher performance in colour vision. TES is an automated, generated value that calculates the number of tiles placed incorrectly and scales the value for uniform analysis. Average TES scores range from thirty to forty in series tests; while scores exceeding seventy can point to a marker for color blindness. Lower scores are intended to point to significantly increased color vision accuracy, as the TES score is directly correlated to the number of tiles incorrectly identified

    30 minutes after lens adaptation. Lens is removed immediately after the assessment is completed.

  • The lens which gives the best performance in ES value

    The highest score achieved using Ishihara Test indicates the best red tint lens. The current passing score is 12 correct of 14 red/green test plates (not including the demonstration plate). Research has shown that scores below twelve indicate color vision deficiency, and twelve or more correct indicate normal color vision, with 97% sensitivity and 100% specificity

    30 minutes after lens adaptation. Lens is removed immediately after the assessment is completed

Study Arms (4)

TES and performance assessment with Type A Red Tint Lens

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

6 subjects will be inserted with the Type A red Tint Lenses. Only the non dominant eye will be inserted. The comparison is made before and after wearing the CL.

Device: red tint contact lenses

TES and performance assessment with Type B Red Tint Lens

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

6 subjects will be inserted with the Type B red Tint Lenses. Only the non dominant eye will be inserted. The comparison is made before and after wearing the CL.

Device: red tint contact lenses

TES and performance assessment with Type C Red Tint Lens

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

6 subjects will be inserted with the Type C red Tint Lenses. Only the non dominant eye will be inserted. The comparison is made before and after wearing the CL.

Device: red tint contact lenses

TES and performance assessment with Type D Red Tint Lens

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

6 subjects will be inserted with the Type D red Tint Lenses. Only the non dominant eye will be inserted. The comparison is made before and after wearing the CL.

Device: red tint contact lenses

Interventions

to compare the performance of these lenses.

Also known as: IGEL Red tint lens type1, IGEL Red tint lens type 2, OCULUS Red tint lens, MAXVUE Red tint lens
TES and performance assessment with Type A Red Tint LensTES and performance assessment with Type B Red Tint LensTES and performance assessment with Type C Red Tint LensTES and performance assessment with Type D Red Tint Lens

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 40 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Age range 18-40 years
  • all sex
  • color defect diagnosed with Ishihara Test
  • no contraindication in contact lens wear

You may not qualify if:

  • have ocular and systemic diseases

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Optometry Clinic

Kuala Lumpur, 50300, Malaysia

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Cole BL, Lian KY, Lakkis C. Using clinical tests of colour vision to predict the ability of colour vision deficient patients to name surface colours. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2007 Jul;27(4):381-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2007.00493.x.

    PMID: 17584289BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Color Vision Defects

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Vision DisordersSensation DisordersNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesCone DystrophyEye Diseases, HereditaryEye DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Haliza Abdul Mutalib, PhD

    UKM

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Only the principal investigator knows the identity of each of the lenses.
Purpose
DEVICE FEASIBILITY
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: 6 colour defect subjects eye were inserted with 4 different types of red tinted contact lenses at different times and then tested with Ishihara Test and 100 Hue Test to obtain the score values. This was done only on one non dominant eye of subject.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 21, 2022

First Posted

December 8, 2022

Study Start

October 20, 2020

Primary Completion

April 30, 2021

Study Completion

July 31, 2021

Last Updated

December 8, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

only the executive summary of all data analysis published by journals will be made available. IPD will be shared only when requested.

Locations