Motor Imagery and Motor Execution Based BCI in Stroke
BCI-MIME
Effect of Motor Imagery and Motor Execution-based Brain Computer Interface on Motor Rehabilitation in Subacute Ischemic Stroke
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
About 50% of stroke patients are unable to live independently because of residual disability. Brain-computer interface (BCI) is based on closed-loop theory, which facilitates neurological remodeling by establishing a bridge between central and peripheral connections. Studies have confirmed that BCI real-time neurofeedback training system based on motor imagery alone can effectively improve patients' motor function. So, is the benefit greater if motor imagery is combined with motor execution? Current conclusions are mixed. In addition, previous studies and our preliminary study found that prefrontal Fp1 and Fp2 areas play an important role in motor recovery after stroke, and they are involved in motor imagery, motor execution, attention and other behavioral processes. Therefore, we designed a BCI training system based on motor imagery and motor execution with prefrontal electroencephalogram (EEG) signals as the modulatory target. This was a randomized placebo-controlled double-blinded clinical trial. Patients in the test group performed BCI-controlled upper extremity motor imagery + upper extremity pedaling training. The control group had the same equipment and training scenario, and patients were also asked to imagine the upper extremity pedaling movement with effort, and patients also wore EEG caps, but the EEG signals were only recorded without controlling the pedaling equipment. After 3 weeks of treatment, we observed the changes of motor and cognitive functions as well as fNIRS-related brain network characteristics in both groups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable stroke
Started Nov 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 23, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 24, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 2, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2023
CompletedDecember 2, 2022
November 1, 2022
7 months
November 23, 2022
November 23, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The change of Fugl-Meyer motor function assessment of upper limb
The score range is 0-66 points, the higher the score, the better the motor function of upper limb.
Three weeks after enrollment
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Berg Balance Scale
Three weeks after enrollment
modified Barthel Index
Three weeks after enrollment
P300 latency
Three weeks after enrollment
Study Arms (2)
BCI
EXPERIMENTALThe experimental group was trained with BCI-controlled pedaling rehabilitation training system. Patients wore EEG caps and were instructed to imagine upper limb pedaling movements. The greater the patients' movement intention, the higher the Mscore of movement intention index on the monitor and the faster the pedaling speed. In addition, the movements on the monitor are synchronized with the actual movements, and the system provides audio and text feedback according to the patient's performance.
Sham BCI
SHAM COMPARATORIn the control group, the training equipment and scenario were the same as in the experimental group, and the patients wore EEG caps and were also instructed to imagine upper limb pedaling movements. However, the system was changed to only record the EEG signal without controlling the pedaling equipment, and the Mscore score and pedaling speed displayed by the equipment in real time were pre-set data of the training performance of the previous pretest patients, i.e., sham neurofeedback.
Interventions
We designed a motor imagery and motor execution-based BCI-controlled pedaling rehabilitation training system. Patients wore EEG caps and were instructed to imagine upper limb pedaling movements. The greater the patients' movement intention, the higher the Mscore of movement intention index on the monitor and the faster the pedaling speed
The training equipment was the same, but the program was changed to record only the EEG signal without controlling the pedaling equipment, and the Mscore score and pedaling speed displayed by the equipment in real time were pre-set training performance data of the previous pretest patients, i.e., sham neurofeedback.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged 35-79 years old;
- Patients with first ischemic stroke onset from 2 week to 3 months;
- Hemiplegia with upper limb strength grades 1-3;
- Consciousness, sitting balance level 1 or above, can cooperate with assessment and treatment;
- The patient or its authorized agent signs the informed consent form.
You may not qualify if:
- Severely impaired cognition (MMSE\<20), unable to pay attention to and understand screen information;
- Severe pain, spasticity and limited mobility of upper extremity.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University
Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710049, China
Related Publications (1)
He J, Yuan Z, Quan L, Xi H, Guo J, Zhu D, Chen M, Yang B, Cui Z, Zhu S, Qiao J. Multimodal assessment of a BCI system for stroke rehabilitation integrating motor imagery and motor attempts: a randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025 Aug 26;22(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12984-025-01723-8.
PMID: 40859358DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 23, 2022
First Posted
December 2, 2022
Study Start
November 24, 2022
Primary Completion
June 30, 2023
Study Completion
July 31, 2023
Last Updated
December 2, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-11