NCT05632666

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to study respiratory muscle training in patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA). The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Is a home-based individualized training program for the inspiratory and expiratory muscles feasible (good adherence and good acceptability)?
  • Can a home-based individualized training program for the inspiratory and expiratory muscles increase the strength of these muscles? Participants will be asked to perform 10 training sessions per week, spread out over 5-7 days. Each training session consists of 30 breathing cycles through the inspiratory muscle trainer and 30 breathing cycles trough the expiratory muscle trainer. In the first four months of the study researchers will compare two groups to see if a higher trainings load is more effective. One group will start at a trainings load of 10% of their maximal inspiratory and expiratory muscle strength. The other group will start at a trainings load of 30% of their maximal inspiratory and expiratory muscle strength. This group also need to adjust the trainings load based on their perceived exertion. After four months all participants will train on a trainings load of 30% of their maximal inspiratory and expiratory muscle strength and adjust the trainings load based on their perceived exertion. The participants will come to the hospital for lung function tests every four months for 12 months.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2021

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 2, 2021

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 2, 2022

Completed
28 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 30, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 31, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 31, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

November 30, 2022

Status Verified

November 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

November 2, 2022

Last Update Submit

November 29, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Spinal Muscular AtrophyInspiratory Muscle TrainingExpiratory Muscle TrainingMaximum Inspiratory Mouth PressureMaximum Expiratory Mouth PressureRespiratory Muscle Training

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (10)

  • Maximal inspiratory mouth pressure (PImax)

    Maximal inspiratory mouth pressure in Centimeter of Water Column (cmH2O) assessed conform the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society (ERS/ATS) recommendations. Reference values of Wilson et al. 1984 will be used to calculate % of predicted.

    Baseline

  • Maximal inspiratory mouth pressure (PImax)

    Maximal inspiratory mouth pressure in Centimeter of Water Column (cmH2O) assessed conform the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society (ERS/ATS) recommendations. Reference values of Wilson et al. 1984 will be used to calculate % of predicted.

    4 months

  • Maximal inspiratory mouth pressure (PImax)

    Maximal inspiratory mouth pressure in Centimeter of Water Column (cmH2O) assessed conform the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society (ERS/ATS) recommendations. Reference values of Wilson et al. 1984 will be used to calculate % of predicted.

    8 months

  • Maximal inspiratory mouth pressure (PImax)

    Maximal inspiratory mouth pressure in Centimeter of Water Column (cmH2O) assessed conform the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society (ERS/ATS) recommendations. Reference values of Wilson et al. 1984 will be used to calculate % of predicted.

    12 months

  • Feasibility: adherence from baseline (M0) to 4 months visit (M4)

    The completion rate of the estimated number of training sessions over 4 months (\>80% of the participants have fulfilled the prescribed treatment = good adherence). Adherence will be monitored by a patient diary, the data saved in the POWERbreathe KHP2 and, two weekly telephone- or video calls by a physiotherapist.

    From baseline (M0) to 4 months visit (M4)

  • Feasibility: adherence from 4 months (M4) to 8 months visit (M8)

    The completion rate of the estimated number of training sessions over 4 months (\>80% of the participants have fulfilled the prescribed treatment = good adherence). Adherence will be monitored by a patient diary, the data saved in the POWERbreathe KHP2 and, two weekly telephone- or video calls by a physiotherapist.

    From 4 months (M4) to 8 months visit (M8)

  • Feasibility: adherence from 8 months (M8) to 12 months visit (M12)

    The completion rate of the estimated number of training sessions over 4 months (\>80% of the participants have fulfilled the prescribed treatment = good adherence). Adherence will be monitored by a patient diary, the data saved in the POWERbreathe KHP2 and, two weekly telephone- or video calls by a physiotherapist.

    From 8 months (M8) to 12 months visit (M12)

  • Feasibility: acceptability

    The willingness to continue the training (\>5 = good acceptability) assessed with a Borg Scale (0-10)

    4 months

  • Feasibility: acceptability

    The willingness to continue the training (\>5 = good acceptability) assessed with a Borg Scale (0-10)

    8 months

  • Feasibility: acceptability

    The willingness to continue the training (\>5 = good acceptability) assessed with a Borg Scale (0-10)

    12 months

Secondary Outcomes (54)

  • Maximal expiratory mouth pressure (PEmax)

    Baseline

  • Maximal expiratory mouth pressure (PEmax)

    4 months

  • Maximal expiratory mouth pressure (PEmax)

    8 months

  • Maximal expiratory mouth pressure (PEmax)

    12 months

  • Health related quality of life

    Baseline

  • +49 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Active treatment group

EXPERIMENTAL
Other: Inspiratory and expiratory muscle training at a therapeutic intensity

Sham-controlled group

SHAM COMPARATOR
Other: Inspiratory and expiratory muscle training at a non-therapeutic intensity

Interventions

The active treatment group will receive inspiratory muscle training starting at a therapeutic intensity of 30% of maximum inspiratory mouth pressure (PImax) and expiratory muscle training starting at a therapeutic intensity of 30% of maximum expiratory mouth pressure (PEmax) for 4 months. In the active treatment group, the inspiratory and expiratory threshold (intensity) will be adjusted to the perceived exertion (measured with a Borg scale).

Active treatment group

The sham-control group will receive the same training protocol as the active treatment group but with a low (10% of PImax and PEmax) and stable non-therapeutic intensity.

Sham-controlled group

Eligibility Criteria

Age8 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥ 8 years;
  • Respiratory muscle weakness (PImax ≤80 cmH2O (31));
  • Maintenance dose (≥2 months) Spinraza® or (≥2 months) Risdiplam or no treatment;
  • Given oral and written informed consent when ≥18 years old and additional informed consent by the parents or legal representative if the participant is \<16 years old.

You may not qualify if:

  • Inability to perform respiratory and/or lung-function testing;
  • Inability to understand Dutch or English;
  • A history of pneumothorax or symptomatic low cardiac output syndrome;
  • Treatment period \< 2 months of Spinraza® or Risdiplam

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Medical Center Utrecht

Utrecht, 3508AB, Netherlands

Location

Related Publications (24)

  • Wadman RI, Vrancken AF, van den Berg LH, van der Pol WL. Dysfunction of the neuromuscular junction in spinal muscular atrophy types 2 and 3. Neurology. 2012 Nov 13;79(20):2050-5. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182749eca. Epub 2012 Oct 31.

    PMID: 23115209BACKGROUND
  • Finkel RS, Sejersen T, Mercuri E; ENMC SMA Workshop Study Group. 218th ENMC International Workshop:: Revisiting the consensus on standards of care in SMA Naarden, The Netherlands, 19-21 February 2016. Neuromuscul Disord. 2017 Jun;27(6):596-605. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2017.02.014. Epub 2017 Mar 2. No abstract available.

    PMID: 28392274BACKGROUND
  • Lunn MR, Wang CH. Spinal muscular atrophy. Lancet. 2008 Jun 21;371(9630):2120-33. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60921-6.

    PMID: 18572081BACKGROUND
  • Verhaart IEC, Robertson A, Wilson IJ, Aartsma-Rus A, Cameron S, Jones CC, Cook SF, Lochmuller H. Prevalence, incidence and carrier frequency of 5q-linked spinal muscular atrophy - a literature review. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017 Jul 4;12(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s13023-017-0671-8.

    PMID: 28676062BACKGROUND
  • Wang CH, Finkel RS, Bertini ES, Schroth M, Simonds A, Wong B, Aloysius A, Morrison L, Main M, Crawford TO, Trela A; Participants of the International Conference on SMA Standard of Care. Consensus statement for standard of care in spinal muscular atrophy. J Child Neurol. 2007 Aug;22(8):1027-49. doi: 10.1177/0883073807305788.

    PMID: 17761659BACKGROUND
  • Stam M, Wadman RI, Wijngaarde CA, Bartels B, Asselman FL, Otto LAM, Goedee HS, Habets LE, de Groot JF, Schoenmakers MAGC, Cuppen I, van den Berg LH, van der Pol WL. Protocol for a phase II, monocentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial to assess efficacy of pyridostigmine in patients with spinal muscular atrophy types 2-4 (SPACE trial). BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 30;8(7):e019932. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019932.

    PMID: 30061431BACKGROUND
  • Mongiovi P, Dilek N, Garland C, Hunter M, Kissel JT, Luebbe E, McDermott MP, Johnson N, Heatwole C. Patient Reported Impact of Symptoms in Spinal Muscular Atrophy (PRISM-SMA). Neurology. 2018 Sep 25;91(13):e1206-e1214. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006241. Epub 2018 Aug 24.

    PMID: 30143566BACKGROUND
  • Bartels B, Habets LE, Stam M, Wadman RI, Wijngaarde CA, Schoenmakers MAGC, Takken T, Hulzebos EHJ, van der Pol WL, de Groot JF. Assessment of fatigability in patients with spinal muscular atrophy: development and content validity of a set of endurance tests. BMC Neurol. 2019 Feb 9;19(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1244-3.

    PMID: 30738436BACKGROUND
  • Bartels B, de Groot JF, Habets LE, Wijngaarde CA, Vink W, Stam M, Asselman FL, van Eijk RPA, van der Pol WL. Fatigability in spinal muscular atrophy: validity and reliability of endurance shuttle tests. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2020 Mar 23;15(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13023-020-1348-2.

    PMID: 32293503BACKGROUND
  • Wadman RI, Wijngaarde CA, Stam M, Bartels B, Otto LAM, Lemmink HH, Schoenmakers MAGC, Cuppen I, van den Berg LH, van der Pol WL. Muscle strength and motor function throughout life in a cross-sectional cohort of 180 patients with spinal muscular atrophy types 1c-4. Eur J Neurol. 2018 Mar;25(3):512-518. doi: 10.1111/ene.13534. Epub 2018 Feb 2.

    PMID: 29194869BACKGROUND
  • Finkel RS, Mercuri E, Darras BT, Connolly AM, Kuntz NL, Kirschner J, Chiriboga CA, Saito K, Servais L, Tizzano E, Topaloglu H, Tulinius M, Montes J, Glanzman AM, Bishop K, Zhong ZJ, Gheuens S, Bennett CF, Schneider E, Farwell W, De Vivo DC; ENDEAR Study Group. Nusinersen versus Sham Control in Infantile-Onset Spinal Muscular Atrophy. N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 2;377(18):1723-1732. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1702752.

    PMID: 29091570BACKGROUND
  • Paul GR, Gushue C, Kotha K, Shell R. The respiratory impact of novel therapies for spinal muscular atrophy. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2021 Apr;56(4):721-728. doi: 10.1002/ppul.25135. Epub 2020 Nov 2.

    PMID: 33098622BACKGROUND
  • Heitschmidt L, Pichlmaier L, Eckerland M, Steindor M, Olivier M, Fuge I, Kolbel H, Hirtz R, Stehling F. Nusinersen does not improve lung function in a cohort of children with spinal muscular atrophy - A single-center retrospective study. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2021 Mar;31:88-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2021.02.007. Epub 2021 Feb 28.

    PMID: 33711791BACKGROUND
  • Koessler W, Wanke T, Winkler G, Nader A, Toifl K, Kurz H, Zwick H. 2 Years' experience with inspiratory muscle training in patients with neuromuscular disorders. Chest. 2001 Sep;120(3):765-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.120.3.765.

    PMID: 11555507BACKGROUND
  • Winkler G, Zifko U, Nader A, Frank W, Zwick H, Toifl K, Wanke T. Dose-dependent effects of inspiratory muscle training in neuromuscular disorders. Muscle Nerve. 2000 Aug;23(8):1257-60. doi: 10.1002/1097-4598(200008)23:83.0.co;2-m.

    PMID: 10918264BACKGROUND
  • Aslan GK, Gurses HN, Issever H, Kiyan E. Effects of respiratory muscle training on pulmonary functions in patients with slowly progressive neuromuscular disease: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2014 Jun;28(6):573-81. doi: 10.1177/0269215513512215. Epub 2013 Nov 25.

    PMID: 24275453BACKGROUND
  • Human A, Morrow BM. Inspiratory muscle training in children and adolescents living with neuromuscular diseases: A pre-experimental study. S Afr J Physiother. 2021 Aug 31;77(1):1577. doi: 10.4102/sajp.v77i1.1577. eCollection 2021.

    PMID: 34522820BACKGROUND
  • Laveneziana P, Albuquerque A, Aliverti A, Babb T, Barreiro E, Dres M, Dube BP, Fauroux B, Gea J, Guenette JA, Hudson AL, Kabitz HJ, Laghi F, Langer D, Luo YM, Neder JA, O'Donnell D, Polkey MI, Rabinovich RA, Rossi A, Series F, Similowski T, Spengler CM, Vogiatzis I, Verges S. ERS statement on respiratory muscle testing at rest and during exercise. Eur Respir J. 2019 Jun 13;53(6):1801214. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01214-2018. Print 2019 Jun.

    PMID: 30956204BACKGROUND
  • Quanjer PH, Stanojevic S, Cole TJ, Baur X, Hall GL, Culver BH, Enright PL, Hankinson JL, Ip MS, Zheng J, Stocks J; ERS Global Lung Function Initiative. Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3-95-yr age range: the global lung function 2012 equations. Eur Respir J. 2012 Dec;40(6):1324-43. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00080312. Epub 2012 Jun 27.

    PMID: 22743675BACKGROUND
  • Quanjer PH, Tammeling GJ, Cotes JE, Pedersen OF, Peslin R, Yernault JC. Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows. Report Working Party Standardization of Lung Function Tests, European Community for Steel and Coal. Official Statement of the European Respiratory Society. Eur Respir J Suppl. 1993 Mar;16:5-40. No abstract available.

    PMID: 8499054BACKGROUND
  • Koopman M, Zanen P, Kruitwagen CL, van der Ent CK, Arets HG. Reference values for paediatric pulmonary function testing: The Utrecht dataset. Respir Med. 2011 Jan;105(1):15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2010.07.020.

    PMID: 20889322BACKGROUND
  • Criee CP; German Airway League. [Recommendations of the German Airway League (Deutsche Atemwegsliga) for the determination of inspiratory muscle function]. Pneumologie. 2003 Feb;57(2):98-100. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-37154. No abstract available. German.

    PMID: 12579465BACKGROUND
  • Wilson SH, Cooke NT, Edwards RH, Spiro SG. Predicted normal values for maximal respiratory pressures in caucasian adults and children. Thorax. 1984 Jul;39(7):535-8. doi: 10.1136/thx.39.7.535.

    PMID: 6463933BACKGROUND
  • Kant-Smits K, Bartels B, Asselman FL, Veldhoen ES, van Eijk RPA, van der Pol WL, Hulzebos EHJ. The RESISTANT study (Respiratory Muscle Training in Patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurol. 2023 Mar 23;23(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12883-023-03136-3.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Muscular Atrophy, Spinal

Interventions

Inhalation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spinal Cord DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesMotor Neuron DiseaseNeurodegenerative DiseasesNeuromuscular Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Respiratory MechanicsRespirationRespiratory Physiological PhenomenaCirculatory and Respiratory Physiological Phenomena

Study Officials

  • Erik Hulzebos, Dr

    UMC Utrecht

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The lung function analyst is blinded for treatment allocation. A data analyst will design and sign the data analysis plan in advance. The data will be analyzed according to the analysis plan by a physiotherapist who is not blinded for treatment allocation. The physiotherapists who will perform the two-weekly telephone calls are not blinded for treatment allocation. Patients will know that there are two treatment groups, and they are informed that it is not yet known which treatment is most effective.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: In the first four months of the study, the active treatment group will receive inspiratory muscle training starting at a therapeutic intensity of 30% of maximum inspiratory mouth pressure (PImax) and expiratory muscle training starting at a therapeutic intensity of 30% of maximum expiratory mouth pressure (PEmax). The sham-control group will receive the same training protocol but with a low (10% of PImax and PEmax) non-therapeutic intensity. After four months, the sham-control group will also be provided with a supervised RMT at a therapeutic intensity of 30% of PImax and PEmax.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical exercise physiologist, Child Development and Exercise Center, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85090, 3508 AB, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 2, 2022

First Posted

November 30, 2022

Study Start

February 2, 2021

Primary Completion

January 31, 2023

Study Completion

January 31, 2023

Last Updated

November 30, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations