Respiratory Muscle Training in Patients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA).
RESISTANT
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to study respiratory muscle training in patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA). The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Is a home-based individualized training program for the inspiratory and expiratory muscles feasible (good adherence and good acceptability)?
- Can a home-based individualized training program for the inspiratory and expiratory muscles increase the strength of these muscles? Participants will be asked to perform 10 training sessions per week, spread out over 5-7 days. Each training session consists of 30 breathing cycles through the inspiratory muscle trainer and 30 breathing cycles trough the expiratory muscle trainer. In the first four months of the study researchers will compare two groups to see if a higher trainings load is more effective. One group will start at a trainings load of 10% of their maximal inspiratory and expiratory muscle strength. The other group will start at a trainings load of 30% of their maximal inspiratory and expiratory muscle strength. This group also need to adjust the trainings load based on their perceived exertion. After four months all participants will train on a trainings load of 30% of their maximal inspiratory and expiratory muscle strength and adjust the trainings load based on their perceived exertion. The participants will come to the hospital for lung function tests every four months for 12 months.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 2, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 2, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 30, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 31, 2023
CompletedNovember 30, 2022
November 1, 2022
2 years
November 2, 2022
November 29, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (10)
Maximal inspiratory mouth pressure (PImax)
Maximal inspiratory mouth pressure in Centimeter of Water Column (cmH2O) assessed conform the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society (ERS/ATS) recommendations. Reference values of Wilson et al. 1984 will be used to calculate % of predicted.
Baseline
Maximal inspiratory mouth pressure (PImax)
Maximal inspiratory mouth pressure in Centimeter of Water Column (cmH2O) assessed conform the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society (ERS/ATS) recommendations. Reference values of Wilson et al. 1984 will be used to calculate % of predicted.
4 months
Maximal inspiratory mouth pressure (PImax)
Maximal inspiratory mouth pressure in Centimeter of Water Column (cmH2O) assessed conform the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society (ERS/ATS) recommendations. Reference values of Wilson et al. 1984 will be used to calculate % of predicted.
8 months
Maximal inspiratory mouth pressure (PImax)
Maximal inspiratory mouth pressure in Centimeter of Water Column (cmH2O) assessed conform the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society (ERS/ATS) recommendations. Reference values of Wilson et al. 1984 will be used to calculate % of predicted.
12 months
Feasibility: adherence from baseline (M0) to 4 months visit (M4)
The completion rate of the estimated number of training sessions over 4 months (\>80% of the participants have fulfilled the prescribed treatment = good adherence). Adherence will be monitored by a patient diary, the data saved in the POWERbreathe KHP2 and, two weekly telephone- or video calls by a physiotherapist.
From baseline (M0) to 4 months visit (M4)
Feasibility: adherence from 4 months (M4) to 8 months visit (M8)
The completion rate of the estimated number of training sessions over 4 months (\>80% of the participants have fulfilled the prescribed treatment = good adherence). Adherence will be monitored by a patient diary, the data saved in the POWERbreathe KHP2 and, two weekly telephone- or video calls by a physiotherapist.
From 4 months (M4) to 8 months visit (M8)
Feasibility: adherence from 8 months (M8) to 12 months visit (M12)
The completion rate of the estimated number of training sessions over 4 months (\>80% of the participants have fulfilled the prescribed treatment = good adherence). Adherence will be monitored by a patient diary, the data saved in the POWERbreathe KHP2 and, two weekly telephone- or video calls by a physiotherapist.
From 8 months (M8) to 12 months visit (M12)
Feasibility: acceptability
The willingness to continue the training (\>5 = good acceptability) assessed with a Borg Scale (0-10)
4 months
Feasibility: acceptability
The willingness to continue the training (\>5 = good acceptability) assessed with a Borg Scale (0-10)
8 months
Feasibility: acceptability
The willingness to continue the training (\>5 = good acceptability) assessed with a Borg Scale (0-10)
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (54)
Maximal expiratory mouth pressure (PEmax)
Baseline
Maximal expiratory mouth pressure (PEmax)
4 months
Maximal expiratory mouth pressure (PEmax)
8 months
Maximal expiratory mouth pressure (PEmax)
12 months
Health related quality of life
Baseline
- +49 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Active treatment group
EXPERIMENTALSham-controlled group
SHAM COMPARATORInterventions
The active treatment group will receive inspiratory muscle training starting at a therapeutic intensity of 30% of maximum inspiratory mouth pressure (PImax) and expiratory muscle training starting at a therapeutic intensity of 30% of maximum expiratory mouth pressure (PEmax) for 4 months. In the active treatment group, the inspiratory and expiratory threshold (intensity) will be adjusted to the perceived exertion (measured with a Borg scale).
The sham-control group will receive the same training protocol as the active treatment group but with a low (10% of PImax and PEmax) and stable non-therapeutic intensity.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 8 years;
- Respiratory muscle weakness (PImax ≤80 cmH2O (31));
- Maintenance dose (≥2 months) Spinraza® or (≥2 months) Risdiplam or no treatment;
- Given oral and written informed consent when ≥18 years old and additional informed consent by the parents or legal representative if the participant is \<16 years old.
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to perform respiratory and/or lung-function testing;
- Inability to understand Dutch or English;
- A history of pneumothorax or symptomatic low cardiac output syndrome;
- Treatment period \< 2 months of Spinraza® or Risdiplam
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- UMC Utrechtlead
- Princess Beatrix Muscle Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University Medical Center Utrecht
Utrecht, 3508AB, Netherlands
Related Publications (24)
Wadman RI, Vrancken AF, van den Berg LH, van der Pol WL. Dysfunction of the neuromuscular junction in spinal muscular atrophy types 2 and 3. Neurology. 2012 Nov 13;79(20):2050-5. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182749eca. Epub 2012 Oct 31.
PMID: 23115209BACKGROUNDFinkel RS, Sejersen T, Mercuri E; ENMC SMA Workshop Study Group. 218th ENMC International Workshop:: Revisiting the consensus on standards of care in SMA Naarden, The Netherlands, 19-21 February 2016. Neuromuscul Disord. 2017 Jun;27(6):596-605. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2017.02.014. Epub 2017 Mar 2. No abstract available.
PMID: 28392274BACKGROUNDLunn MR, Wang CH. Spinal muscular atrophy. Lancet. 2008 Jun 21;371(9630):2120-33. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60921-6.
PMID: 18572081BACKGROUNDVerhaart IEC, Robertson A, Wilson IJ, Aartsma-Rus A, Cameron S, Jones CC, Cook SF, Lochmuller H. Prevalence, incidence and carrier frequency of 5q-linked spinal muscular atrophy - a literature review. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017 Jul 4;12(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s13023-017-0671-8.
PMID: 28676062BACKGROUNDWang CH, Finkel RS, Bertini ES, Schroth M, Simonds A, Wong B, Aloysius A, Morrison L, Main M, Crawford TO, Trela A; Participants of the International Conference on SMA Standard of Care. Consensus statement for standard of care in spinal muscular atrophy. J Child Neurol. 2007 Aug;22(8):1027-49. doi: 10.1177/0883073807305788.
PMID: 17761659BACKGROUNDStam M, Wadman RI, Wijngaarde CA, Bartels B, Asselman FL, Otto LAM, Goedee HS, Habets LE, de Groot JF, Schoenmakers MAGC, Cuppen I, van den Berg LH, van der Pol WL. Protocol for a phase II, monocentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial to assess efficacy of pyridostigmine in patients with spinal muscular atrophy types 2-4 (SPACE trial). BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 30;8(7):e019932. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019932.
PMID: 30061431BACKGROUNDMongiovi P, Dilek N, Garland C, Hunter M, Kissel JT, Luebbe E, McDermott MP, Johnson N, Heatwole C. Patient Reported Impact of Symptoms in Spinal Muscular Atrophy (PRISM-SMA). Neurology. 2018 Sep 25;91(13):e1206-e1214. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006241. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
PMID: 30143566BACKGROUNDBartels B, Habets LE, Stam M, Wadman RI, Wijngaarde CA, Schoenmakers MAGC, Takken T, Hulzebos EHJ, van der Pol WL, de Groot JF. Assessment of fatigability in patients with spinal muscular atrophy: development and content validity of a set of endurance tests. BMC Neurol. 2019 Feb 9;19(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1244-3.
PMID: 30738436BACKGROUNDBartels B, de Groot JF, Habets LE, Wijngaarde CA, Vink W, Stam M, Asselman FL, van Eijk RPA, van der Pol WL. Fatigability in spinal muscular atrophy: validity and reliability of endurance shuttle tests. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2020 Mar 23;15(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13023-020-1348-2.
PMID: 32293503BACKGROUNDWadman RI, Wijngaarde CA, Stam M, Bartels B, Otto LAM, Lemmink HH, Schoenmakers MAGC, Cuppen I, van den Berg LH, van der Pol WL. Muscle strength and motor function throughout life in a cross-sectional cohort of 180 patients with spinal muscular atrophy types 1c-4. Eur J Neurol. 2018 Mar;25(3):512-518. doi: 10.1111/ene.13534. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
PMID: 29194869BACKGROUNDFinkel RS, Mercuri E, Darras BT, Connolly AM, Kuntz NL, Kirschner J, Chiriboga CA, Saito K, Servais L, Tizzano E, Topaloglu H, Tulinius M, Montes J, Glanzman AM, Bishop K, Zhong ZJ, Gheuens S, Bennett CF, Schneider E, Farwell W, De Vivo DC; ENDEAR Study Group. Nusinersen versus Sham Control in Infantile-Onset Spinal Muscular Atrophy. N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 2;377(18):1723-1732. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1702752.
PMID: 29091570BACKGROUNDPaul GR, Gushue C, Kotha K, Shell R. The respiratory impact of novel therapies for spinal muscular atrophy. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2021 Apr;56(4):721-728. doi: 10.1002/ppul.25135. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
PMID: 33098622BACKGROUNDHeitschmidt L, Pichlmaier L, Eckerland M, Steindor M, Olivier M, Fuge I, Kolbel H, Hirtz R, Stehling F. Nusinersen does not improve lung function in a cohort of children with spinal muscular atrophy - A single-center retrospective study. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2021 Mar;31:88-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2021.02.007. Epub 2021 Feb 28.
PMID: 33711791BACKGROUNDKoessler W, Wanke T, Winkler G, Nader A, Toifl K, Kurz H, Zwick H. 2 Years' experience with inspiratory muscle training in patients with neuromuscular disorders. Chest. 2001 Sep;120(3):765-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.120.3.765.
PMID: 11555507BACKGROUNDWinkler G, Zifko U, Nader A, Frank W, Zwick H, Toifl K, Wanke T. Dose-dependent effects of inspiratory muscle training in neuromuscular disorders. Muscle Nerve. 2000 Aug;23(8):1257-60. doi: 10.1002/1097-4598(200008)23:83.0.co;2-m.
PMID: 10918264BACKGROUNDAslan GK, Gurses HN, Issever H, Kiyan E. Effects of respiratory muscle training on pulmonary functions in patients with slowly progressive neuromuscular disease: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2014 Jun;28(6):573-81. doi: 10.1177/0269215513512215. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
PMID: 24275453BACKGROUNDHuman A, Morrow BM. Inspiratory muscle training in children and adolescents living with neuromuscular diseases: A pre-experimental study. S Afr J Physiother. 2021 Aug 31;77(1):1577. doi: 10.4102/sajp.v77i1.1577. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34522820BACKGROUNDLaveneziana P, Albuquerque A, Aliverti A, Babb T, Barreiro E, Dres M, Dube BP, Fauroux B, Gea J, Guenette JA, Hudson AL, Kabitz HJ, Laghi F, Langer D, Luo YM, Neder JA, O'Donnell D, Polkey MI, Rabinovich RA, Rossi A, Series F, Similowski T, Spengler CM, Vogiatzis I, Verges S. ERS statement on respiratory muscle testing at rest and during exercise. Eur Respir J. 2019 Jun 13;53(6):1801214. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01214-2018. Print 2019 Jun.
PMID: 30956204BACKGROUNDQuanjer PH, Stanojevic S, Cole TJ, Baur X, Hall GL, Culver BH, Enright PL, Hankinson JL, Ip MS, Zheng J, Stocks J; ERS Global Lung Function Initiative. Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3-95-yr age range: the global lung function 2012 equations. Eur Respir J. 2012 Dec;40(6):1324-43. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00080312. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
PMID: 22743675BACKGROUNDQuanjer PH, Tammeling GJ, Cotes JE, Pedersen OF, Peslin R, Yernault JC. Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows. Report Working Party Standardization of Lung Function Tests, European Community for Steel and Coal. Official Statement of the European Respiratory Society. Eur Respir J Suppl. 1993 Mar;16:5-40. No abstract available.
PMID: 8499054BACKGROUNDKoopman M, Zanen P, Kruitwagen CL, van der Ent CK, Arets HG. Reference values for paediatric pulmonary function testing: The Utrecht dataset. Respir Med. 2011 Jan;105(1):15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2010.07.020.
PMID: 20889322BACKGROUNDCriee CP; German Airway League. [Recommendations of the German Airway League (Deutsche Atemwegsliga) for the determination of inspiratory muscle function]. Pneumologie. 2003 Feb;57(2):98-100. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-37154. No abstract available. German.
PMID: 12579465BACKGROUNDWilson SH, Cooke NT, Edwards RH, Spiro SG. Predicted normal values for maximal respiratory pressures in caucasian adults and children. Thorax. 1984 Jul;39(7):535-8. doi: 10.1136/thx.39.7.535.
PMID: 6463933BACKGROUNDKant-Smits K, Bartels B, Asselman FL, Veldhoen ES, van Eijk RPA, van der Pol WL, Hulzebos EHJ. The RESISTANT study (Respiratory Muscle Training in Patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurol. 2023 Mar 23;23(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12883-023-03136-3.
PMID: 36959618DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Erik Hulzebos, Dr
UMC Utrecht
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The lung function analyst is blinded for treatment allocation. A data analyst will design and sign the data analysis plan in advance. The data will be analyzed according to the analysis plan by a physiotherapist who is not blinded for treatment allocation. The physiotherapists who will perform the two-weekly telephone calls are not blinded for treatment allocation. Patients will know that there are two treatment groups, and they are informed that it is not yet known which treatment is most effective.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical exercise physiologist, Child Development and Exercise Center, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85090, 3508 AB, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 2, 2022
First Posted
November 30, 2022
Study Start
February 2, 2021
Primary Completion
January 31, 2023
Study Completion
January 31, 2023
Last Updated
November 30, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share