Evaluation of a Family Strengthening Program Evaluation in Sierra Leone to Prevent Family Separation

NCT05632237 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: cafo
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 226
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

In Sierra Leone, poverty and challenges with family functioning can lead to family separation, and children may go to live on the street or enter residential care institutions/orphanages. Helping Children Worldwide (HCW), a non-profit organization with over 20 years of experience in Sierra Leone, has developed a two-part Family Strengthening Program delivered by their program partners in Sierra Leone, the Child Reintegration Centre, to improve families financial literacy and attachment between caregivers and children, with the ultimate goal of preventing family separation. The hypothesis of this study is that the Family Strengthening Program program is effective at (1) changing parenting behaviors, (2) improving emotional regulation, (3) improving caregiver-child attachment, and (4) improving financial literacy in dyads consisting of children ages 9-13 and their caregivers.

Conditions

Parent-Child Relations; Emotion Regulation; Economic Problems; Parenting

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

• Caregiver and child change in emotional regulation as measured by the Difficulties in Emotional Regulation (DERS) scale

  Baseline: Up to 2 months before intervention; Endline: Up to 2 months after intervention

• Change in child attachment as measured by the Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment (IPPA)

  Baseline: Up to 2 months before intervention; Endline: Up to 2 months after intervention

• Change in caregiver- and child-reported use of punishment by caregiver

  Measures developed for this study tailored for context; e.g., flogging child with hand or cane, public shaming, withholding food

  Baseline: Up to 2 months before intervention; Endline: Up to 2 months after intervention

• Change in self-reported economic well-being

  Measures developed for this study tailored for context and intervention content; e.g., awareness of income/spending, saving and budgeting behaviors, ability to pay for unexpected expense

  Baseline: Up to 2 months before intervention; Endline: Up to 2 months after intervention

Secondary Outcomes (1)

• Change in child- and caregiver-reported parenting behaviors by caregiver

  Baseline: Up to 2 months before intervention; Endline: Up to 2 months after intervention

Study Arms (2)

Family strengthening program

EXPERIMENTAL

Behavioral: Family strengthening program

Care as usual

NO INTERVENTION

These participants have already been receiving case management from the Child Reintegration Centre prior to the study, and they will continue to receive care as usual, which is to receive normal case management visits without this added Family Strengthening Program component. Case management consists of a social work staff alternating between visiting children at home or at school each month to provide supervision, coaching, counseling, assessments, and identification of additional support needs.

Interventions

Family strengthening program BEHAVIORAL

Phase I: 2-day Family Strengthening Workshop. The specific topics included in the workshop include: emotions, Body Progressive Muscle Relaxation, body stretch, self care, apologizing, routines to promote attachment, teamwork, saving, delayed gratification, anticipating unexpected expenses, identifying family strengths and values. Phase II: Case management with family strengthening curriculum. Curriculum is delivered over the course of four visits (about 3 months), some of which involve both caregiver and child while others are just for the caregiver. Topics included are using appropriate discipline, effective communication for family problem-solving, and home budgeting.

Family strengthening program

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 9 Years+
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Child (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• Dyads must consist of a principal child (the one whose situation initiated their involvement with the Child Reintegration Centre) and their primary caregiver (as defined by the Child Reintegration Centre as the person in the family primarily responsible for the health and wellbeing of the principal child and is noted as such in their case file)
• Primary child is ages 9-13
• Dyad is actively participating in Child Reintegration Centre services (i.e., child must have been seen by the case manager in the last month)
• Dyad lives in the Bo area.
• (1) Family has been assessed by the Child Reintegration Centre to be in active crisis, i.e., specific concerns about the child being at-risk or unsafe (suspicions of abuse or neglect).

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Boston College: lead
• Christian Alliance for Orphans: collaborator
• Helping Children Worldwide: collaborator
• Child Reintegration Centre: collaborator

Study Sites (1)

the Child Reintegration Centre

Bo, Sierra Leone

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Emotional Regulation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Self-Control; Social Behavior; Behavior

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: NON RANDOMIZED
• Masking: NONE
• Masking Details: During baseline data collection, participants were not yet assigned to arms, so all parties were masked.
• Purpose: PREVENTION
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: PhD

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: November 9, 2022
• First Posted: November 30, 2022
• Study Start: October 16, 2022
• Primary Completion: May 22, 2023
• Study Completion: May 22, 2023
• Last Updated: April 20, 2025

Record last verified: 2024-08

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

SI (1)