Diagnostic Performance and Impact of a Multiplex PCR Pneumonia Panel in ICU Patients With Severe Pneumonia.
1 other identifier
observational
210
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to assess the diagnostic performance of multiplex respiratory PCR (PCR-RM) compared to standard microbiological tests and its potential impact on the early adaptation of antibiotic treatment in intensive care patients with severe pneumonia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Feb 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 4, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 22, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 3, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 22, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 22, 2024
CompletedFebruary 23, 2024
February 1, 2024
1.1 years
November 4, 2022
February 22, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
The rate of diagnostic concordance between Classical microbiological cultures and the respiratory multiplex PCR (RM-PCR) and conventional microbiological cultures (CMC) to identify pathogens responsible for severe pneumonia in critically ill patients.
Classical microbiological cultures (CMC) will serve as the gold standard for the comparison between techniques, considering a test result: 1. A true positive, when CMC and RM-PCR have identified the same microorganism (CMC+, PCR-RM +). 2. A false positive, when RM-PCR detected an organism but not CMC (CMC-, RM-PCR+) 3. A true negative, when no method detected any microorganism (CMC-, RM-PCR -) 4. A false negative, when CMC but not RM-PCR has detected an organism (CMC+, RM-PCR -). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for the respiratory multiplex PCR will be calculated using the precedent findings.
through study completion, an average of 6 months
The impact of the respiratory multiplex PCR (RM-PCR) on the appropriateness of empirical antimicrobial therapy.
The proportion of patients for whom the respiratory multiplex PCR (RM-PCR) induces an appropriate change of antibiotic therapy. Appropriate changes include adequacy, de-escalation, and escalation of antibiotic treatment. * Adequacy is defined as introducing an antibiotic to cover a microorganism that was not adequately treated before the results of RM-PCR. * Escalation is defined by a widening of the ATB spectrum to cover a pathogen not taken into account or the detection of resistance genes. * De-escalation is defined as the use of a narrower-spectrum anti-infective or the discontinuation of an ATB combination.
through study completion, an average of 6 months
Study Arms (1)
ICU patients with severe pneumonia
Critically ill patients with severe pneumonia under mechanical ventilation including ventilator-associated pneumonia, community-acquired or hospital-acquired pneumonia.
Interventions
The BIOFIRE® FILMARRAY® Pneumonia plus Panel
Eligibility Criteria
Critically ill patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), or hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP). For CAP and HAP, only patients under invasive mechanical ventilation will be included.
You may qualify if:
- critically ill adult patients
- clinical, biological, and radiological signs of severe pneumonia.
- community-acquired pneumonia, hospital-acquired pneumonia, or ventilator-associated pneumonia
- invasive mechanical ventilation.
You may not qualify if:
- \- Non-invasive mechanical ventilation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Avicenna Military Hospital
Marrakesh, Marrakesh Tensift El Haouz, 40000, Morocco
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine - Head of surgical intensive care unit
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 4, 2022
First Posted
November 22, 2022
Study Start
February 3, 2023
Primary Completion
February 22, 2024
Study Completion
February 22, 2024
Last Updated
February 23, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR
- Time Frame
- until 5 years after study completion
- Access Criteria
- Healthcare workers.
The datasets of the study will be available from the principal investigator on reasonable request.