NCT05624411|UnknownFDA Device
Loading search results
Sponsor study identifier
observational
150
1 country
1
Study Start
October 22, 2022
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
September 1, 2023
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Study Completion
September 1, 2023
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Clinical outcomes of post-placental insertion of Cupper T380A and Multiload 375 contraceptive devices during cesarean section
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
September 1, 2023
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
October 21, 2022
Actual (reported)October 22, 2022
Actual (reported)November 22, 2022
Actual (reported)September 1, 2023
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
September 1, 2023
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
The expulsion rate of Multiload IUCD versus CopperT380A after post-placental insertion
The expulsion rate of Multiload IUCD versus CopperT380A after post-placental insertion
6 weeks
Uterine bleeding
6 weeks
Uterine bleeding
6 weeks
Uterine bleeding
6 weeks
PID
6 weeks
perforation
6 weeks
post-placental insertion of CU T380A IUD during CS
post-placental insertion of multiload 375 IUD during CS
post-placental insertion of intrauterine contraceptive device
post-placental insertion of intrauterine contraceptive device
All patients admitted for delivery at obstetric and gynecology emergency unit of sohag university hospital which is a tertiary center at sohag city in egypt who requested postpartum contraception, were invited to participate in the study
Sohag University
Sohag, Egypt
Bilian X. Chinese experience with intrauterine devices. Contraception. 2007 Jun;75(6 Suppl):S31-4. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.12.007. Epub 2007 Feb 16.
Hillard PJ. Practical tips for intrauterine devices use in adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2013 Apr;52(4 Suppl):S40-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.09.023.
Behtash N, Akhavan S, Mokhtar S. Pelvic mass due to transmigrated IUD. Acta Med Iran. 2010 Mar-Apr;48(2):125-6.
First Submitted
October 21, 2022
First Posted
November 22, 2022
Study Start
October 22, 2022
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
September 1, 2023
Estimated (date passed)Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Vasquez P, Schreiber CA. The missing IUD. Contraception. 2010 Aug;82(2):126-8. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.02.019. Epub 2010 Apr 2. No abstract available.
Ko PC, Lin YH, Lo TS. Intrauterine contraceptive device migration to the lower urinary tract: report of 2 cases. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011 Sep-Oct;18(5):668-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.05.010.
Kus E, Swierczewski A, Pasinski J, Estemberg D, Brzozowska M, Kowalska-Koprek U, Berner-Trabska M, Karowicz-Bilinska A. [Intrauterine contraceptive device in an appendix--a case report]. Ginekol Pol. 2012 Feb;83(2):132-5. Polish.
Taras AR, Kaufman JA. Laparoscopic retrieval of intrauterine device perforating the sigmoid colon. JSLS. 2010 Jul-Sep;14(3):453-5. doi: 10.4293/108680810X12924466006684.
Vilallonga R, Rodriguez N, Vilchez M, Armengol M. Translocation of an intrauterine contraceptive device: incidental finding in the rectosigmoid colon. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2010;2010:404160. doi: 10.1155/2010/404160. Epub 2010 Jun 9.
Koltan SO, Tamay AG, Yildirim Y. Chronic cervical perforation by an intrauterine device. J Chin Med Assoc. 2010 Jun;73(6):325-6. doi: 10.1016/S1726-4901(10)70069-1.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on Obstetric Practice. Committee Opinion No. 670: Immediate Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Aug;128(2):e32-7. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001587.
Whitaker AK, Chen BA. Society of Family Planning Guidelines: Postplacental insertion of intrauterine devices. Contraception. 2018 Jan;97(1):2-13. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.09.014. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
Lopez LM, Bernholc A, Hubacher D, Stuart G, Van Vliet HA. Immediate postpartum insertion of intrauterine device for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 26;2015(6):CD003036. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003036.pub3.
Averbach SH, Ermias Y, Jeng G, Curtis KM, Whiteman MK, Berry-Bibee E, Jamieson DJ, Marchbanks PA, Tepper NK, Jatlaoui TC. Expulsion of intrauterine devices after postpartum placement by timing of placement, delivery type, and intrauterine device type: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;223(2):177-188. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.045. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
Nelson AL, Chen S, Eden R. Intraoperative placement of the Copper T-380 intrauterine devices in women undergoing elective cesarean delivery: a pilot study. Contraception. 2009 Jul;80(1):81-3. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.01.014. Epub 2009 Mar 4.
Mosley FR, Shahi N, Kurer MA. Elective surgical removal of migrated intrauterine contraceptive devices from within the peritoneal cavity: a comparison between open and laparoscopic removal. JSLS. 2012 Apr-Jun;16(2):236-41. doi: 10.4293/108680812x13427982377265.
This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Study Completion
September 1, 2023
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Last Updated
November 22, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-11
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: