Comparative Ultrasound Analysis of Two Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Fillers
RES
A Randomized, Split-face Clinical Study on Comparative Ultrasound Analysis of Two Hyaluronic Acid Fillers for Midface Correction
1 other identifier
interventional
11
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To assess and compare tissue aggregation and visualization of two Hyaluronic Acid fillers via ultrasound
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 12, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 7, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 21, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 25, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 6, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 4, 2026
CompletedMay 4, 2026
April 1, 2026
1.2 years
November 7, 2022
May 22, 2025
April 13, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Assess and Compare Tissue Aggregation and Visualization of Hyaluronic Acid Fillers by Investigator Using Ultrasound
Investigator visually reviewed ultrasound scans to determine filler flexibility and aggregation once injected into skin tissues.
Immediately post-treatment
Assess and Compare Tissue Aggregation and Visualization of Hyaluronic Acid Fillers by Investigator Using Ultrasound
Investigator visually reviewed ultrasound scans to determine filler flexibility and aggregation once injected into skin tissues.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Evaluate Volume Change in the Treated Areas Using 3D Imaging
4 weeks
Evaluate Volume Change in the Treated Areas Using 3D Imaging
6 months
Evaluate Volume Change in the Treated Areas Using 3D Imaging
9 months
Evaluate Volume Change in the Treated Areas Using 3D Imaging
12 months
Evaluate Subject Satisfaction Using Self-assessment Questionnaire
4 weeks
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Restylane Contour
ACTIVE COMPARATORForm: transparent gel of Hyaluronic Acid with the addition of lidocaine hydrochloride. Mode of administration: injection Dosage: at investigator's discretion for optimal outcome. Frequency and duration: injection at baseline and optional touch-up at week 4.
Juvederm Voluma
ACTIVE COMPARATORForm: sterile, biodegradable, non-pyrogenic, viscoelastic, clear, colorless, homogenous gel implant of Hyaluronic Acid crosslinked with BDDE, formulated with lidocaine. Mode of administration: injection Dosage: at investigator's discretion for optimal outcome. Frequency and duration: injection at baseline and optional touch-up at week 4.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject with midface volume loss and contour deficiency
- Ability of giving consent for participation in the study
- Agreement to adhere to the procedures and requirements of the study and to report to the institute on the day(s) and at the time(s) scheduled for the assessments
You may not qualify if:
- History of allergy or hypersensitivity to lidocaine and/or injectable hyaluronic acid
- Previous permanent or semi-permanent implant in proposed treatment area
- Previous biodegradable tissue augmentation therapy in the proposed treatment area within 12 months prior to the baseline visit
- History of other facial treatment/procedure at the study area (midface) in the previous 6 months that would potentially interfere with study injections (e.g., facial surgery, oral surgery, resurfacing, mesotherapy, lipolytic injections, botulinum toxin injections)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Galderma R&Dlead
Study Sites (1)
The Aesthetic Clinique
Santa Rosa Beach, Florida, 32459, United States
Limitations and Caveats
The sample size was relatively small, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. However, the split- face design enhances the power of the side-by-side product comparisons.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Thu Q. Nguyen, PhD
- Organization
- Galderma
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Steven F Weiner, MD
The Aesthetic Clinique
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Subjects are blinded to treatment assignment to each side of their faces.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 7, 2022
First Posted
November 21, 2022
Study Start
July 12, 2022
Primary Completion
September 25, 2023
Study Completion
December 6, 2023
Last Updated
May 4, 2026
Results First Posted
May 4, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share