The Difference in the Mechanism of Action Between Two Brands of Dexamfetamine in Adults With ADHD
DAVE
The Difference in Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Profiles Between Tentin and Magisterial Dexamfetamine in Adults With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, a Double Blinded Randomised Crossover-controlled Trial
2 other identifiers
interventional
1
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare in the pk/pd profiles of magisterial dexamfetamine and Tentin in adults with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are: Q1: is there a difference between pk/pd profiles of the two forms of dexamfetamine? Q2: how does the pharmacokinetic variability influences the objective and subjective (side) effects experienced by adult patients with ADHD? Participants will:
- take the Quantified behavior Test for analysis of objective effects.
- undergo blood sampling for analysis of the plasma concentration of dexamphetamine.
- undergo blood pressure and heart rate measurements.
- fill out 4 types of questionnaires. Researchers will compare the outcomes between magisterial dexamphetamine and Tentin use in a crossover setting.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 4, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 17, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 14, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2025
CompletedFebruary 18, 2025
February 1, 2025
1.7 years
November 4, 2022
February 17, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Quantified behavior Test (QbTest) - Time Active
Time Active for analysis of objective effects. The Quantified behaviour Test (QbTest) provides data to assess the three core symptoms of ADHD, that is: hyperactivity, inattention and impulsivity. Time Active (in %) is one of the scores used to measure hyperactivity, inattention and impulsivity. For the current study cardinal outcomes will be derived from a Principal Component Analysis.
0-120 minutes after drug administration
Quantified behavior Test (QbTest) - Distance
Distance for analysis of objective effects. The Quantified behaviour Test (QbTest) provides data to assess the three core symptoms of ADHD, that is: hyperactivity, inattention and impulsivity. Distance (in meters) is one of the scores used to measure hyperactivity, inattention and impulsivity. For the current study cardinal outcomes will be derived from a Principal Component Analysis.
0-120 minutes after drug administration
Quantified behavior Test (QbTest) - Area
Area for analysis of objective effects. The Quantified behaviour Test (QbTest) provides data to assess the three core symptoms of ADHD, that is: hyperactivity, inattention and impulsivity. Area (in cm2) is one of the scores used to measure hyperactivity, inattention and impulsivity. For the current study cardinal outcomes will be derived from a Principal Component Analysis.
0-120 minutes after drug administration
Quantified behavior Test (QbTest) - Micro Events
Micro Events for analysis of objective effects. The Quantified behaviour Test (QbTest) provides data to assess the three core symptoms of ADHD, that is: hyperactivity, inattention and impulsivity. Micro Events (in millimeters) is one of the scores used to measure hyperactivity, inattention and impulsivity. For the current study cardinal outcomes will be derived from a Principal Component Analysis.
0-120 minutes after drug administration
Quantified behavior Test (QbTest) - Motion Simplicity
Motion Simplicity for analysis of objective effects. The Quantified behaviour Test (QbTest) provides data to assess the three core symptoms of ADHD, that is: hyperactivity, inattention and impulsivity. Motion Simplicity (in %) is one of the scores used to measure hyperactivity, inattention and impulsivity. For the current study cardinal outcomes will be derived from a Principal Component Analysis.
0-120 minutes after drug administration
Blood samples
For analysis of the plasma concentration of dexamfetamine.
0-180 minutes after drug administration
Blood pressure
For autonomic and adverse effects measurements. Measured in mmHg Normal value: 120/80 mmHg
0-180 minutes after drug administration
Heart rate
For autonomic and adverse effects measurements. Measured in BPM Normal value: 60-100 BPM
0-180 minutes after drug administration
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Addiction Research Centre Inventory (ARCI) - Acute Subjective Response to Substances (ASRS): Amphetamine Scale
45-180 minutes after drug administration
Bond-Lader Visual Analog Scale (BL-VAS)
0-180 minutes after drug administration
QbTest performance questionnaire
0-180 minutes after drug administration
Other Outcomes (1)
Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ)
Before drug administration
Study Arms (2)
Magisterial Dexamphetamine
OTHERMagisterial Dexamphetamine
Tentin
OTHERTentin
Interventions
Magisterial Dexamfetamine
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participant is aged ≥ 18 years at time of screening.
- Participant is diagnosed with ADHD according to the DSM 5 criteria.
- Participant has switched from Tentin© to magisterial dexamfetamine due to the adverse effects of Tentin.
- Participant is being treated adequately with dexamphetamine, as determined by their practitioner, at time of screening.
- Participant or their legal representative is able and willing to provide written informed consent.
- Participant is able and willing to comply with the study protocol (e.g. swallow capsules, have blood samples taken, can visit the outpatient clinic twice).
- Participant has not participated in another study in the past three months.
You may not qualify if:
- Participant has a disorder that might affect drug absorption (e.g. gastrointestinal, metabolic, endocrine or liver disorder).
- Participant is allergic to the ingredients of the capsules.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Glenn Dumont
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1105AZ, Netherlands
Related Publications (17)
Lott DC, Kim SJ, Cook EH, de Wit H. Serotonin transporter genotype and acute subjective response to amphetamine. Am J Addict. 2006 Sep-Oct;15(5):327-35. doi: 10.1080/10550490600859868.
PMID: 16966188BACKGROUNDMartin WR, Sloan JW, Sapira JD, Jasinski DR. Physiologic, subjective, and behavioral effects of amphetamine, methamphetamine, ephedrine, phenmetrazine, and methylphenidate in man. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1971 Mar-Apr;12(2):245-58. doi: 10.1002/cpt1971122part1245. No abstract available.
PMID: 5554941BACKGROUNDWong YN, Wang L, Hartman L, Simcoe D, Chen Y, Laughton W, Eldon R, Markland C, Grebow P. Comparison of the single-dose pharmacokinetics and tolerability of modafinil and dextroamphetamine administered alone or in combination in healthy male volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol. 1998 Oct;38(10):971-8. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1998.tb04395.x.
PMID: 9807980BACKGROUNDDolder PC, Strajhar P, Vizeli P, Hammann F, Odermatt A, Liechti ME. Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Lisdexamfetamine Compared with D-Amphetamine in Healthy Subjects. Front Pharmacol. 2017 Sep 7;8:617. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00617. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 28936175BACKGROUNDDan O, Cohen A, Asraf K, Saveliev I, Haimov I. The Impact of Sleep Deprivation on Continuous Performance Task Among Young Men With ADHD. J Atten Disord. 2021 Jul;25(9):1284-1294. doi: 10.1177/1087054719897811. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
PMID: 31916494BACKGROUNDParrott AC, Hindmarch I. The Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire in psychopharmacological investigations - a review. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1980;71(2):173-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00434408.
PMID: 6777817BACKGROUNDTarrasch R, Laudon M, Zisapel N. Cross-cultural validation of the Leeds sleep evaluation questionnaire (LSEQ) in insomnia patients. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2003 Dec;18(8):603-10. doi: 10.1002/hup.534.
PMID: 14696019BACKGROUNDManzar MD, Salahuddin M, Maru TT, Alghadir A, Anwer S, Bahammam AS, Pandi-Perumal SR. Validation of the adapted Leeds sleep evaluation questionnaire in Ethiopian university students. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Mar 13;16(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0876-0.
PMID: 29534726BACKGROUNDHaertzen CA. Development of scales based on patterns of drug effects, using the addiction Research Center Inventory (ARCI). Psychol Rep. 1966 Feb;18(1):163-94. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1966.18.1.163. No abstract available.
PMID: 5908477BACKGROUNDHILL HE, HAERTZEN CA, WOLBACH AB Jr, MINER EJ. THE ADDICTION RESEARCH CENTER INVENTORY: STANDARDIZATION OF SCALES WHICH EVALUATE SUBJECTIVE EFFECTS OF MORPHINE, AMPHETAMINE, PENTOBARBITAL, ALCOHOL, LSD-25, PYRAHEXYL AND CHLORPROMAZINE. Psychopharmacologia. 1963 May 15;4:167-83. doi: 10.1007/BF02584089. No abstract available.
PMID: 14048539BACKGROUNDLader MH, Bond AJ. Interaction of pharmacological and psychological treatments of anxiety. Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 1998;(34):42-8.
PMID: 9829016BACKGROUNDSetnik B, Roland CL, Pixton G, Webster L. Measurement of Drug Liking in Abuse Potential Studies: A Comparison of Unipolar and Bipolar Visual Analog Scales. J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Feb;57(2):266-274. doi: 10.1002/jcph.801. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
PMID: 27444046BACKGROUNDAhearn EP. The use of visual analog scales in mood disorders: a critical review. J Psychiatr Res. 1997 Sep-Oct;31(5):569-79. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3956(97)00029-0.
PMID: 9368198BACKGROUNDAshinoff BK, Abu-Akel A. Hyperfocus: the forgotten frontier of attention. Psychol Res. 2021 Feb;85(1):1-19. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01245-8. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
PMID: 31541305BACKGROUNDSchmid Y, Hysek CM, Simmler LD, Crockett MJ, Quednow BB, Liechti ME. Differential effects of MDMA and methylphenidate on social cognition. J Psychopharmacol. 2014 Sep;28(9):847-56. doi: 10.1177/0269881114542454. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
PMID: 25052243BACKGROUNDPourhoseingholi MA, Baghestani AR, Vahedi M. How to control confounding effects by statistical analysis. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2012 Spring;5(2):79-83.
PMID: 24834204BACKGROUNDKang H. The prevention and handling of the missing data. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013 May;64(5):402-6. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2013.64.5.402. Epub 2013 May 24.
PMID: 23741561BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Glenn JH Dumont, PhD
Amsterdam UMC
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 4, 2022
First Posted
November 17, 2022
Study Start
April 14, 2023
Primary Completion
December 31, 2024
Study Completion
December 31, 2025
Last Updated
February 18, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Privacy protocol