Immune Mechanisms of Vitamin D to Reduce Chronic Pain After Burn
2 other identifiers
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this pilot clinical trial is to learn whether vitamin D is able to prevent chronic pain following burn injury and to determine what biological mechanisms are engaged by Vitamin D following burn injury. The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are:
- Is the clinical trial protocol feasible?
- Is Vitamin D administration following burn injury safe?
- How does vitamin D cause changes in the immune system in the aftermath of burn injury? Following informed consent, participants will be asked to:
- Take 6 capsules by mouth one time following burn injury (Vitamin D or Placebo)
- Provide a blood sample at baseline and 6 weeks following injury
- Fill out surveys daily while in the hospital, weekly through 6 weeks, and at 3 months and 6 months. Researchers will compare Vitamin D and placebo groups to see if there are differences in adverse effects (side effects), chronic pain, and profiles of immune cells from collected blood samples.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Apr 2023
Typical duration for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 16, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 12, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 16, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 16, 2026
CompletedMay 5, 2026
January 1, 2026
2.8 years
November 1, 2022
April 28, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Follow-up rate 6 weeks following burn injury
The proportion of patients who are able to follow-up at 6 weeks and complete a questionnaire will be calculated. To meet the primary outcome, follow-up will be \>80% at 6 weeks.
6 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (8)
25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration 6 weeks after Vitamin D2 treatment
Baseline, 6 weeks
Safety of Vitamin D2 administration in aftermath of burn injury
6 weeks
By Group Efficacy Estimates Over Year Following Thermal Burn Injury
Baseline, 1 week, 2 week, 3 week, 4 week, 5 week, and 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
Opioid cessation
6 months
Neuropathic pain quality
6 months
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Inflammatory immune cells populations assessed with mass cytometry
6 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Vitamin D2 (Ergocalciferol)
ACTIVE COMPARATOROne time, oral dose of Vitamin D2 administered via 6 50,000 IU Ergocalciferol capsules. Capsules will be encapsulated and masked to be indistinguishable from placebo.
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATOROne time, oral dose of 6 placebo capsules filled with inert powder and encapsulated and masked to be indistinguishable from active comparator.
Interventions
One-time, oral dose of 300,000 IU of Ergocalciferol administered via 6 capsules.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ≥ 18 years and ≤ 70 years of age
- MThBI severe enough to warrant admission to Burn Surgery Service (NOTE: surgery may or may not be indicated)
- Admission and subsequent enrollment occurs within 1 week of MThBI
- Patients experience a thermal burn injury, not an electrical or chemical burn.
- Has a smartphone with continuous service \>1 year
- Alert and oriented
- Willing to take study medication (6 capsules of Vitamin D or placebo)
- Point of care Vitamin D level \<100 ng/mL
- Able to speak and read English
- Burn survivors with acute pain severity ≥ 7/10 on the Numeric Rating Scale (initial pain severity reported by patient on screening)
- Total Body surface area burned \<30%
You may not qualify if:
- Substantial comorbid injury (e.g. long bone fracture)
- Pregnancy/Breastfeeding
- Prisoner status
- Active psychosis, suicidal ideation, or homicidal ideation
- Requires an emergency/bedside escharotomy or fasciotomy for the treatment of burn injury.
- Known Child-Pugh liver disease severity classification B or C.
- Known chronic kidney disease stage 4 or higher (GFR≤29).
- No other history or condition that would, in the investigator's judgment, indicate that the patient would very likely be non-compliant with the study or unsuitable for the study (e.g. might interfere with the study, confound interpretation, or endanger patient).
- Intubated and sedated at time of enrollment.
- Hypersensitivity to Vitamin D3, ergocalciferol, calcitriol, alfacalcidol, calcipotriol
- Known hypercalcemia (based on routine admission laboratory assessment).
- Sarcoidosis
- Hyperphosphatemia (based on routine admission laboratory assessment)
- Taking Vitamin D supplements in excess of 800 IU daily.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27517, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Matthew Mauck, MD, PhD
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 1, 2022
First Posted
November 16, 2022
Study Start
April 12, 2023
Primary Completion
January 16, 2026
Study Completion
January 16, 2026
Last Updated
May 5, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- starting 12 and continuing for 36 months after publication
- Access Criteria
- Approved IRB, IEC, or REB and an executed data use/sharing agreement with UNC.
Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared on request provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with the University of North Carolina (UNC).