Sponsor study identifier
interventional
10
1 country
1
Study Start
January 1, 2023
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
November 1, 2023
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Study Completion
November 1, 2023
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
This study will investigate if the use of motor imagery to practice a balance task is as effective as physically practicing balance tasks as measured by the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) in persons with MS. A secondary purpose is to investigate if using a motor imagery balance intervention will limit fatigue typically experienced with physical movement in this population.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
November 1, 2023
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
November 7, 2022
Actual (reported)November 14, 2022
Actual (reported)January 1, 2023
Actual (reported)November 1, 2023
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
November 1, 2023
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Berg Balance Test
The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) measures balance among older people with impairment in balance function by assessing the performance of functional tasks. It is a valid instrument used for the evaluation of the effectiveness of interventions and for quantitative descriptions of function in clinical practice and research. The BBS is comprised of a 14-item scale designed to measure the balance of the older adult in a clinical setting. Scoring: A five-point scale, ranging from 0-4. "0" indicates the lowest level of function and "4" is the highest level of function. Total Score = 56 Interpretation: 41-56 = low fall risk 21-40 = medium fall risk 0-20 = high fall risk. A change of 8 points is required to reveal a genuine change in function between 2 assessments. Participants who attain a perfect score on the BBS will be removed from the study. Participants who attain a non-perfect score on the BBS will be accepted into the study.
Two weeks
MS Impact Scale-29 (MSIS29)
Two weeks
Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)
Two weeks
Activities-Specific Balance Confidence scale (ABC)
Two weeks
Participants will be given a single one on one in person instruction session and a home exercise program corresponding to their assigned group with instructions on physical practice. The Standard of Care / Physical practice will include physically performing movements that closely or entirely mimic elements of the BBS. For example, if a subject struggles with the sit to stand portion of the BBS, they will physically practice sit to stand based on the treating physical therapist's clinical decision of appropriate task parameters and dosage. The individual subject's MS fatigue and their performance of the task will be taken into account when deciding dosage.
Participants will be given a single one on one in person instruction session and a home exercise program corresponding to their assigned group with instructions on using motor imagery to imagine themselves performing the balance task with which they struggled on the BBS. Motor imagery practice involves having the participant imagine themselves performing elements of the BBS without physically moving. The participants in this group will be guided through 1 session of motor imagery that will be recorded on their person phone for them to use as a home exercise program.
We will investigate if using motor imagery (mentally imagining and practicing a task) as a means of balance training is as effective as physical practice
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Dominican University New York
Orangeburg, New York, 10962, United States
Stefanie DiCarrado, DPT
Dominican University New York
First Submitted
November 7, 2022
First Posted
November 14, 2022
Study Start
January 1, 2023
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Primary Completion
November 1, 2023
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Study Completion
November 1, 2023
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Last Updated
February 8, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-02
We are happy to share data if there are similar studies occurring where their protocols are similar enough that direct comparisons can be made between groups' pre and post test results.
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: