Long-term Outcome of RIPC After IV Thrombolysis in AIS Patients
RESPONTH
Long-term Efficacy of Remote Ischemic Postconditioning After Rt-PA Intravenous Thrombolysis in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: The Randomized RESPONTH Trial
1 other identifier
observational
62
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this observational study is to learn about the long-term efficacy of our previous study in acute ischemic stroke(AIS) patients who underwent either remote ischemic postconditioning(RIPC) or sham treatment after intravenous thrombolysis. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Dose the RIPC treatment combined with IV thrombolysis can improve the long-term functional outcome in AIS patients?
- Dose the RIPC treatment combined with IV thrombolysis can improve the incidence rates of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, recurrent stroke/TIA, new-onset clinical AF on this long-term follow-up? A single rater (A.E.P.) trained by an experienced stroke physician (S.T.E.) contacted patients, relatives, and family physicians to gather all available medical information on the following issues: 1) survival status, 2) date of death in those who died (based on information of the treating physicians), 3) mRS score at the time of the interview, 4) recurrent stroke/TIA, 5) new onset atrial fibrillation, 6) other cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, deep venous thrombosis, peripheral arteriopathy. Researchers will compare RIPC group and control group to see if the RIPC treatment have a long-term effect in AIS patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Oct 2022
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 28, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 31, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 14, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 30, 2023
CompletedFebruary 8, 2023
October 1, 2022
2 months
October 31, 2022
February 6, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
the proportion of excellent functional outcome, %
An excellent functional outcome define as mRS= 0 and 1.
through study completion, an average of 5 year
Secondary Outcomes (3)
the proportion of favorable outcome (mRS scores 0-2), %
through study completion, an average of 5 year
incidence rates of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, %
From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 100 months
recurrent stroke/TIA
From date of randomization until the date of first documented recurrent stroke/TIA or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 100 months
Study Arms (2)
RIPC group
Patients underwent RIPC treatment after IV thrombolysis in the index stroke.
Control group
The control group underwent no inflations or deflations in the index stroke.
Interventions
1\) functional outcomes(mRS scoring), 2)survival status, 3) date of death in those who died (based on information of the treating physicians), 3) mRS score at the time of the interview, 4) recurrent stroke/TIA, 5) new onset atrial fibrillation, 6) other cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, deep venous thrombosis, peripheral arteriopathy.
Eligibility Criteria
Between August 2017 and June 2018, a total of 68 AIS patients who underwent IVT treatment were randomized into either the RIPC treatment group or the control group. During the trial period, thirty-four participants in the control group and thirty-two participants in the RIPC group were followed for the percentage of patients at 90 days with a favorable outcome, which was de- fined as a score of 0 or 1 on the modified Rankin Score (mRS). After the completion of the trial, the trial participants were followed by their primary care physicians.
You may qualify if:
- All patients who completed the previous interventional rater-blinded controlled study were invited for the follow-up session.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
First Affiliated Hospital of Xian Jiantong University
Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710061, China
Related Publications (1)
An J, Wei M, Wang D, Zhao C, Yuan X, Kimberly WT, Luo G, Li G. Long-term efficacy of remote ischaemic postconditioning after rt-PA intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischaemic stroke. BMJ Open. 2025 Oct 28;15(10):e094001. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094001.
PMID: 41151950DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Guoliang Li
First Affiliated Hospital of Xian Jiaotong University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 31, 2022
First Posted
November 14, 2022
Study Start
October 28, 2022
Primary Completion
December 30, 2022
Study Completion
January 30, 2023
Last Updated
February 8, 2023
Record last verified: 2022-10