Catheter Directed Therapy in Intermediate Risk Pulmonary Embolism Patients
Catheter Directed Therapy for Intermediate Risk Pulmonary Embolism Patients Guided by Prediction Model for Impending Shock
1 other identifier
interventional
200
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Aim of the work:
- 1.To compare conventional medical therapy versus catheter-directed therapy in intermediate high risk acute pulmonary embolism.
- 2.To define predictors of progression from intermediate to high-risk in medically-treated patients for ideal timing for intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for early_phase_1
Started Dec 2022
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 16, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 10, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 30, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2024
CompletedNovember 10, 2022
November 1, 2022
1 year
October 16, 2022
November 9, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
1.comparison between conventional medical therapy and catheter-directed therapy in intermediate high risk acute pulmonary embolism patients
comparison in intermediate high risk acute pulmonary embolism patients between conventional medical therapy and catheter-directed therapy as regarding safety and efficacy of the therapy by clinical assessment of occurrence of major adverse cardiac events.
up to 2 years
1.comparison between conventional medical therapy and catheter-directed therapy in intermediate high risk acute pulmonary embolism patients
comparison in intermediate high risk acute pulmonary embolism patients between conventional medical therapy and catheter-directed therapy as regarding safety and efficacy of the therapy by echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular function by TAPSE (mm) , RV/LV diameter ratio ,TR peak gradient (mmHg)
up to 2 years
1.comparison between conventional medical therapy and catheter-directed therapy in intermediate high risk acute pulmonary embolism patients
comparison in intermediate high risk acute pulmonary embolism patients between conventional medical therapy and catheter-directed therapy as regarding safety and efficacy of the therapy by CT pulmonary angiography to asses embolus size and Pulmonary artery obstruction index
up to 2 years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
predictors of progression from intermediate to high-risk acute pulmonary embolism patients
up to 2 years
Other Outcomes (1)
Implementation of pulmonary embolism response team at Assiut university hospitals
up to 2 years
Study Arms (2)
catheter directed therapy group in intermediate risk pulmonary embolism patients
ACTIVE COMPARATORin this arm, intermediated risk pulmonary embolism patients is treated by intervention in the form of: * A. Mechanical embolectomy: by hydromechanical defragmentation by pigta * B. Suction embolectomy: using The Penumbra Indigo aspiration system * C. Catheter directed thrombolysis:
medical therapy group in intermediate risk pulmonary embolism patients
ACTIVE COMPARATORin this arm, intermediated risk pulmonary embolism patients is treated by routine anticoagulation only.
Interventions
Hydro-mechanical defragmentation (HMD) is one of the CDT modalities for high-risk PE patients, in which rapid pigtail rotation is combined with heparinized saline injection for thrombus fragmentation
The Penumbra Indigo aspiration system (Penumbra Inc., Alameda, CA, USA) that will be used, is an 8-Fr device and its associated tubing, pump, and separator, has the flexibility for placement in segmental branches of the pulmonary arteries. 510(k) Number :K160449 FOIA Releasable 510(k) K160449 Device Name:Penumbra System, Penumbra Pump MAX
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Acute pulmonary embolism patients (confirmed by CT pulmonary angiography \[CTPA\])
- symptoms started within 15 days of enrollment
- intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism patients , i.e., who have all of the following risk indicators combined :(2) i.Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) class III-V or sPESI ≥1, ii.AND RV dysfunction on TTE or CTPA, iii.AND elevated cardiac troponin levels
- with none of the following high-risk presentations: cardiac arrest, systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg, or vasopressors required to achieve a BP ≥90 mmHg despite an adequate filling status, or end-organ hypoperfusion.
You may not qualify if:
- high risk patients who are hemodynamically unstable (cardiogenic shock, SBP \<90 mmHg, or use of intotropic support).
- low risk patients with no RV dysfunction.
- Patients with history of CTEPH (or previous acute PE)
- Patients known to have other pulmonary hypertension, apart from group IV (CTEPH).
- Patients with sever kidney injury (eGFR \<30 mg/dl/1.7m2).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (4)
Konstantinides SV, Torbicki A, Agnelli G, Danchin N, Fitzmaurice D, Galie N, Gibbs JS, Huisman MV, Humbert M, Kucher N, Lang I, Lankeit M, Lekakis J, Maack C, Mayer E, Meneveau N, Perrier A, Pruszczyk P, Rasmussen LH, Schindler TH, Svitil P, Vonk Noordegraaf A, Zamorano JL, Zompatori M; Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J. 2014 Nov 14;35(43):3033-69, 3069a-3069k. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu283. Epub 2014 Aug 29. No abstract available.
PMID: 25173341BACKGROUNDGiri J, Sista AK, Weinberg I, Kearon C, Kumbhani DJ, Desai ND, Piazza G, Gladwin MT, Chatterjee S, Kobayashi T, Kabrhel C, Barnes GD. Interventional Therapies for Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Current Status and Principles for the Development of Novel Evidence: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019 Nov 12;140(20):e774-e801. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000707. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
PMID: 31585051BACKGROUNDHassan AKM, Ahmed H, Ahmed Y, Elfadl AA, Omar A. Efficacy and safety of hydro-mechanical defragmentation in intermediate- and high-risk pulmonary embolism. Egypt Heart J. 2021 Sep 25;73(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s43044-021-00204-2.
PMID: 34564780BACKGROUNDKroupa J, Buk M, Weichet J, Malikova H, Bartova L, Linkova H, Ionita O, Kozel M, Motovska Z, Kocka V. A pilot randomised trial of catheter-directed thrombolysis or standard anticoagulation for patients with intermediate-high risk acute pulmonary embolism. EuroIntervention. 2022 Oct 7;18(8):e639-e646. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01080.
PMID: 35620984BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shrouk K Ali, MSc
Assiut University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- early phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 16, 2022
First Posted
November 10, 2022
Study Start
December 30, 2022
Primary Completion
December 30, 2023
Study Completion
December 30, 2024
Last Updated
November 10, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share