NCT05612854

Brief Summary

Aim of the work:

  1. 1.To compare conventional medical therapy versus catheter-directed therapy in intermediate high risk acute pulmonary embolism.
  2. 2.To define predictors of progression from intermediate to high-risk in medically-treated patients for ideal timing for intervention.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
200

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for early_phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2022

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 16, 2022

Completed
25 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 10, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 30, 2022

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 30, 2023

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 30, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

November 10, 2022

Status Verified

November 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

October 16, 2022

Last Update Submit

November 9, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

catheter directed therapyintermediate risk pulmonary embolism

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • 1.comparison between conventional medical therapy and catheter-directed therapy in intermediate high risk acute pulmonary embolism patients

    comparison in intermediate high risk acute pulmonary embolism patients between conventional medical therapy and catheter-directed therapy as regarding safety and efficacy of the therapy by clinical assessment of occurrence of major adverse cardiac events.

    up to 2 years

  • 1.comparison between conventional medical therapy and catheter-directed therapy in intermediate high risk acute pulmonary embolism patients

    comparison in intermediate high risk acute pulmonary embolism patients between conventional medical therapy and catheter-directed therapy as regarding safety and efficacy of the therapy by echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular function by TAPSE (mm) , RV/LV diameter ratio ,TR peak gradient (mmHg)

    up to 2 years

  • 1.comparison between conventional medical therapy and catheter-directed therapy in intermediate high risk acute pulmonary embolism patients

    comparison in intermediate high risk acute pulmonary embolism patients between conventional medical therapy and catheter-directed therapy as regarding safety and efficacy of the therapy by CT pulmonary angiography to asses embolus size and Pulmonary artery obstruction index

    up to 2 years

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • predictors of progression from intermediate to high-risk acute pulmonary embolism patients

    up to 2 years

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Implementation of pulmonary embolism response team at Assiut university hospitals

    up to 2 years

Study Arms (2)

catheter directed therapy group in intermediate risk pulmonary embolism patients

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

in this arm, intermediated risk pulmonary embolism patients is treated by intervention in the form of: * A. Mechanical embolectomy: by hydromechanical defragmentation by pigta * B. Suction embolectomy: using The Penumbra Indigo aspiration system * C. Catheter directed thrombolysis:

Procedure: Mechanical embolectomy: by hydromechanical defragmentation by pigtailDevice: Suction embolectomy by the Penumbra Indigo aspiration system

medical therapy group in intermediate risk pulmonary embolism patients

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

in this arm, intermediated risk pulmonary embolism patients is treated by routine anticoagulation only.

Procedure: Mechanical embolectomy: by hydromechanical defragmentation by pigtailDevice: Suction embolectomy by the Penumbra Indigo aspiration system

Interventions

Hydro-mechanical defragmentation (HMD) is one of the CDT modalities for high-risk PE patients, in which rapid pigtail rotation is combined with heparinized saline injection for thrombus fragmentation

catheter directed therapy group in intermediate risk pulmonary embolism patientsmedical therapy group in intermediate risk pulmonary embolism patients

The Penumbra Indigo aspiration system (Penumbra Inc., Alameda, CA, USA) that will be used, is an 8-Fr device and its associated tubing, pump, and separator, has the flexibility for placement in segmental branches of the pulmonary arteries. 510(k) Number :K160449 FOIA Releasable 510(k) K160449 Device Name:Penumbra System, Penumbra Pump MAX

catheter directed therapy group in intermediate risk pulmonary embolism patientsmedical therapy group in intermediate risk pulmonary embolism patients

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Acute pulmonary embolism patients (confirmed by CT pulmonary angiography \[CTPA\])
  • symptoms started within 15 days of enrollment
  • intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism patients , i.e., who have all of the following risk indicators combined :(2) i.Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) class III-V or sPESI ≥1, ii.AND RV dysfunction on TTE or CTPA, iii.AND elevated cardiac troponin levels
  • with none of the following high-risk presentations: cardiac arrest, systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg, or vasopressors required to achieve a BP ≥90 mmHg despite an adequate filling status, or end-organ hypoperfusion.

You may not qualify if:

  • high risk patients who are hemodynamically unstable (cardiogenic shock, SBP \<90 mmHg, or use of intotropic support).
  • low risk patients with no RV dysfunction.
  • Patients with history of CTEPH (or previous acute PE)
  • Patients known to have other pulmonary hypertension, apart from group IV (CTEPH).
  • Patients with sever kidney injury (eGFR \<30 mg/dl/1.7m2).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (4)

  • Konstantinides SV, Torbicki A, Agnelli G, Danchin N, Fitzmaurice D, Galie N, Gibbs JS, Huisman MV, Humbert M, Kucher N, Lang I, Lankeit M, Lekakis J, Maack C, Mayer E, Meneveau N, Perrier A, Pruszczyk P, Rasmussen LH, Schindler TH, Svitil P, Vonk Noordegraaf A, Zamorano JL, Zompatori M; Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J. 2014 Nov 14;35(43):3033-69, 3069a-3069k. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu283. Epub 2014 Aug 29. No abstract available.

    PMID: 25173341BACKGROUND
  • Giri J, Sista AK, Weinberg I, Kearon C, Kumbhani DJ, Desai ND, Piazza G, Gladwin MT, Chatterjee S, Kobayashi T, Kabrhel C, Barnes GD. Interventional Therapies for Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Current Status and Principles for the Development of Novel Evidence: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019 Nov 12;140(20):e774-e801. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000707. Epub 2019 Oct 4.

    PMID: 31585051BACKGROUND
  • Hassan AKM, Ahmed H, Ahmed Y, Elfadl AA, Omar A. Efficacy and safety of hydro-mechanical defragmentation in intermediate- and high-risk pulmonary embolism. Egypt Heart J. 2021 Sep 25;73(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s43044-021-00204-2.

    PMID: 34564780BACKGROUND
  • Kroupa J, Buk M, Weichet J, Malikova H, Bartova L, Linkova H, Ionita O, Kozel M, Motovska Z, Kocka V. A pilot randomised trial of catheter-directed thrombolysis or standard anticoagulation for patients with intermediate-high risk acute pulmonary embolism. EuroIntervention. 2022 Oct 7;18(8):e639-e646. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01080.

    PMID: 35620984BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Shrouk K Ali, MSc

    Assiut University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Shrouk K Ali, MSc

CONTACT

Ayman Kh Hassan, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
early phase 1
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Randomized controlled, open-label, parallel-assignment, prospective study
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 16, 2022

First Posted

November 10, 2022

Study Start

December 30, 2022

Primary Completion

December 30, 2023

Study Completion

December 30, 2024

Last Updated

November 10, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share