Assessment of Different Imaging Systems for Dental Plaque Scoring
1 other identifier
observational
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study was to analyze the correlation between the dental plaque indices measured different imaging systems and conventional clinical indices that assess dental plaque. From among the patients who visited Marmara University, Faculty of Dentistry 30 adults between the age of 18-30, who had under 3 DMFT scores, were selected for full-mouth imaging. Digital dental photography, digital scanning system and fluorecam methods were used for taking intraoral images. The Turesky Modified Quigley Hein Plaque Index (TMQHPI) was scored both by the clinical examination method and on the images taken. The correlations between the clinical examinaton, digital photography, digital scanning system and fluorecam scores were analyzed. Maxillary and mandibulary anterior teeth's buccal surfaces were scored to TMQHPI after using disclosing agent.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started May 2021
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 17, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 2, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 27, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 3, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 10, 2022
CompletedNovember 10, 2022
November 1, 2022
2 months
November 3, 2022
November 3, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
1. Dental plaque scoring clinically before staining agent
Dental plaque of the volunteer's anterior teeth were scored to Turesky Modified Quigley Hein Plaque Index
15 minutes
2. Dental plaque scoring clinically after applying staining agent
Dental plaque of the volunteer's anterior teeth were scored to Turesky Modified Quigley Hein Plaque Index
15 minutes
3.Dental plaque scoring after applying staining agent on the taken images with FluoreCam
Dental plaque of the volunteer's anterior teeth were scored on the images taken with FluoreCam to Turesky Modified Quigley Hein Plaque Index
45 minutes
4. Dental plaque scoring after applying staining agent on the taken images with Digital Camera
Dental plaque of the volunteer's anterior teeth were scored on the images taken with FluoreCam to Turesky Modified Quigley Hein Plaque Index
45 minutes
5. Dental plaque scoring after applying staining agent on the taken images with Intraoral Scanner
Dental plaque of the volunteer's anterior teeth were scored on the images taken with Intraoral Scanner to Turesky Modified Quigley Hein Plaque Index
1 hour
Study Arms (3)
1. Signal Expert Protection
After scoring clinically and with dental plaque imaging methods, Signal Expert Protection toothpaste was given to 10 volunteers.
2. Colgate Hemp Seed Oil
After scoring clinically and with dental plaque imaging methods, Colgate Hemp Seed Oil toothpaste was given to 10 volunteers.
3. Gumgumix
After scoring clinically and with dental plaque imaging methods, Gumgumix toothpaste was given to 10 volunteers.
Interventions
Signal Expert Protection: Conventional toothpaste including Sodium Lauryl Sulphate and fluoride. Colgate Hemp Seed Oil: Herbal toothpaste including hemp seed oil and also fluoride. Gumgumix: Herbal toothpaste including ginger extract (no fluoride).
Eligibility Criteria
The study was performed with 30 adult male and female patients aged between 18-35, recruited from among the outpatients who visited the Marmara University, Faculty of Dentistry, Restorative Dentistry Department, agreed to the terms of the experiment, had a DMFT score 3 or lower, and had relatively even teeth arrangement. Among patients, those with orthodontic bracket placed, severe crowding of teeth not visually verified in the photograph, fixed or implant restoration installed, more than 3 DMFT score, and serious systemic diseases were excluded from the study.
You may qualify if:
- The volunteers between the ages of 18-35, No systemic disease, Teeth that do not contain hereditary, morphological, drug-induced structural changes, Not using orthodontic wires and appliances, Having a DMFT score of 3 and less than 3, Have not received antibiotic treatment in the last 6 weeks, Not using mouthwash in the last 6 weeks, Without dental calculus, Oral hygiene habits are similar to each other, University student or graduate, Thirty volunteers who were conscious of being able to understand and apply the guidelines set forth in the study were included.
You may not qualify if:
- Among volunteers, those with orthodontic bracket placed, severe crowding of teeth not visually verified in the photograph, fixed or implant restoration installed, more than 3 DMFT score, and serious systemic diseases were excluded from the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Marmara University Department of Restorative Dentistry
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Biospecimen
dental plaque samples of volunteers
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 3, 2022
First Posted
November 10, 2022
Study Start
May 17, 2021
Primary Completion
July 2, 2021
Study Completion
August 27, 2021
Last Updated
November 10, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF
- Time Frame
- data will be available in 2 years.
- Access Criteria
- all researchers may access the data of this study
Data will be shared after the publication of the article.