In-office Hysteroscopic Laser Ablation for Symptomatic Submucous Uterine Fibroids
1 other identifier
interventional
20
3 countries
4
Brief Summary
To evaluate feasibility and efficacy of in-office hysteroscopic ablation of submucous uterine fibroid using diode laser
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 23, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 3, 2022
CompletedJuly 24, 2023
July 1, 2023
1.1 years
October 23, 2022
July 21, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Bleeding
improvement of the heavy menstrual bleeding
before the procedure and at 3 months follow up visit
Secondary Outcomes (2)
fibroid volume reduction
before the procedure and at 3 months follow up visit
changes on the myoma vascularity
before the procedure and at 3 months follow up visit
Study Arms (1)
Symptomatic submucosal myoma
EXPERIMENTALpatients with symptomatic submucosal fibroids (heavy menstrual bleeding) were elected for hysteroscopy with laser ablation of the myoma.
Interventions
patients with symptomatic submucosal fibroids (heavy menstrual bleeding) were elected for hysteroscopy and laser ablation of the myoma
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- symptomatic patients without desire of future fertility (symptoms included heavy menstrual bleeding, abdominal discomfort, bulk symptoms such as urinary frequency, pelvic pressure and constipation),
- grade 0-2 (FIGO classification) ≤ 7cm fibroids with evident vascularity seen by 3D-DS compared to its adjacent myometrial tissue
You may not qualify if:
- intramural fibroids (FIGO class 3 or more),
- \>2 submucosal fibroids,
- pelvic inflammatory disease,
- known gynecologic malignancy,
- severe cervical stenosis,
- pregnancy
- desire of future fertility,
- previous cervical surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ariel Universitylead
Study Sites (4)
Laniado University Hospital
Netanya, Israel
University of Cagliari
Cagliari, Italy
universita della campagna luigi Vanvitelli
Napoli, Italy
Parc de Salut Mar
Barcelona, 08003, Spain
Related Publications (23)
Carranza-Mamane B, Havelock J, Hemmings R; REPRODUCTIVE ENDOCRINOLOGY AND INFERTILITY COMMITTEE; SPECIAL CONTRIBUTOR. The management of uterine fibroids in women with otherwise unexplained infertility. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Mar;37(3):277-285. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30318-2.
PMID: 26001875BACKGROUNDValentine LN, Bradley LD. Hysteroscopy for Abnormal Uterine Bleeding and Fibroids. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;60(2):231-244. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000287.
PMID: 28406809BACKGROUNDCapmas P, Levaillant JM, Fernandez H. Surgical techniques and outcome in the management of submucous fibroids. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Aug;25(4):332-8. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283630e10.
PMID: 23812380BACKGROUNDYendru KS, Yelamanchi SD, Vaddiraju GB. Hysteroscopic Resection of Submucous Fibroids in Symptomatic Women. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2019 Apr;69(2):166-172. doi: 10.1007/s13224-018-1139-z. Epub 2018 May 31.
PMID: 30956472BACKGROUNDVitale SG, Lagana AS, Caruso S, Garzon S, Vecchio GM, La Rosa VL, Casarin J, Ghezzi F. Comparison of three biopsy forceps for hysteroscopic endometrial biopsy in postmenopausal patients (HYGREB-1): A multicenter, single-blind randomized clinical trial. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 Dec;155(3):425-432. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13669. Epub 2021 Apr 4.
PMID: 33686708BACKGROUNDNappi L, Pontis A, Sorrentino F, Greco P, Angioni S. Hysteroscopic metroplasty for the septate uterus with diode laser: a pilot study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Nov;206:32-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.08.035. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
PMID: 27632410BACKGROUNDHaimovich S, Lopez-Yarto M, Urresta Avila J, Saavedra Tascon A, Hernandez JL, Carreras Collado R. Office Hysteroscopic Laser Enucleation of Submucous Myomas without Mass Extraction: A Case Series Study. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:905204. doi: 10.1155/2015/905204. Epub 2015 May 18.
PMID: 26090457BACKGROUNDGoldfarb HA. Laparoscopic coagulation of myoma (myolysis). Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1995 Dec;22(4):807-19. No abstract available.
PMID: 8786884BACKGROUNDDonnez J, Squifflet J, Polet R, Nisolle M. Laparoscopic myolysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2000 Nov-Dec;6(6):609-13. doi: 10.1093/humupd/6.6.609.
PMID: 11129695BACKGROUNDDubuisson JB, Chapron C, Fauconnier A, Kreiker G. Laparoscopic myomectomy and myolysis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Aug;9(4):233-8.
PMID: 9263713BACKGROUNDD'Alterio MN, Scicchitano F, Fanni D, Faa G, Laganà AS, Noventa M, et al. Ex vivo myolysis with dual wavelengths diode laser system: macroscopic and histopathological examination. CEOG. 2021;48(4):875-82
BACKGROUNDNieuwenhuis LL, Hehenkamp WJK, Brolmann HAM, Huirne JAF. 3D power Doppler in uterine fibroids; influence of gain, cardiac cycle and off-line measurement techniques. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Jan;38(1):103-109. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2017.1330323. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
PMID: 28780884BACKGROUNDVitale SG, Lagana AS, Torok P, Lasmar RB, Carugno J, Palumbo M, Tesarik J. Virtual sonographic hysteroscopy in assisted reproduction: A retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022 Jan;156(1):112-118. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13651. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
PMID: 33615469BACKGROUNDFleischer AC. Sonographic depiction of tumor vascularity and flow: from in vivo models to clinical applications. J Ultrasound Med. 2000 Jan;19(1):55-61. doi: 10.7863/jum.2000.19.1.55.
PMID: 10625191BACKGROUNDvon Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg. 2014 Dec;12(12):1495-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.013. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
PMID: 25046131BACKGROUNDMunro MG, Critchley HO, Broder MS, Fraser IS; FIGO Working Group on Menstrual Disorders. FIGO classification system (PALM-COEIN) for causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in nongravid women of reproductive age. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011 Apr;113(1):3-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.11.011. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
PMID: 21345435BACKGROUNDCarugno J, Grimbizis G, Franchini M, Alonso L, Bradley L, Campo R, Catena U, Carlo A, Attilio DSS, Martin F, Haimovich S, Isaacson K, Moawad N, Saridogan E, Clark TJ. International Consensus Statement for Recommended Terminology Describing Hysteroscopic Procedures. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022 Mar;29(3):385-391. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.10.004. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
PMID: 34648932BACKGROUNDBettocchi S, Selvaggi L. A vaginoscopic approach to reduce the pain of office hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1997 Feb;4(2):255-8. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(97)80019-9.
PMID: 9050737BACKGROUNDTinelli R, Litta P, Angioni S, Bettocchi S, Fusco A, Leo L, Landi S, Cicinelli E. A multicenter study comparing surgical outcomes and ultrasonographic evaluation of scarring after laparoscopic myomectomy with conventional versus barbed sutures. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Jul;134(1):18-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.10.029. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
PMID: 27209335BACKGROUNDVitale SG, Riemma G, Haimovich S, Carugno J, Alonso Pacheco L, Perez-Medina T, Parry JP, Torok P, Tesarik J, Della Corte L, Cobellis L, Di Spiezio Sardo A, De Franciscis P. Risk of endometrial cancer in asymptomatic postmenopausal women in relation to ultrasonographic endometrial thickness: systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jan;228(1):22-35.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.07.043. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
PMID: 35932873BACKGROUNDGeorgiou D, Tranoulis A, Jackson TL. Hysteroscopic tissue removal system (MyoSure) for the resection of polyps, sub-mucosal leiomyomas and retained products of conception in an out-patient setting: A single UK institution experience. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Dec;231:147-151. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.10.030. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
PMID: 30388609BACKGROUNDMunro MG. Uterine polyps, adenomyosis, leiomyomas, and endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril. 2019 Apr;111(4):629-640. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.02.008.
PMID: 30929720BACKGROUNDVilos GA, Vilos AG, Abu-Rafea B, Leyland N, Allaire C, Laberge PY, Murji A, Singh SS, Thiel J. Interventional Uterine-Sparing Therapies for Leiomyomas: A Commentary on Myolysis. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2020 Feb;42(2):169-172. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2019.08.025. Epub 2019 Nov 23.
PMID: 31767379BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sergio Haimovich, MD, PhD
Laniado University Hospital - Ariel University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director of the Gynecology Department at the Laniado Hospital
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 23, 2022
First Posted
November 3, 2022
Study Start
January 1, 2018
Primary Completion
January 30, 2019
Study Completion
December 30, 2019
Last Updated
July 24, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-07