The Effect of Dual Attention in an EMDR Intervention
DA_EMDR
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Research to date indicates that trauma-focused treatments are safe and effective for PTSD, even when higher-risk comorbidities (e.g., psychosis or substance use) are present. In particular, there are data pointing to the efficacy of prolonged exposure therapy and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy. Clinical practice guidelines specifically recommend trauma-focused treatment with exposure and/or cognitive restructuring components. Regarding EMDR interventions, there are increasing results supporting its efficacy. Some interesting clinical advantages presented by EMDR as opposed to cognitive-behavioral therapies are 1) the efficacy found despite less exposure to the traumatic memory, 2) the exclusion of homework, 3) as well as the rapid reduction in subjective disturbance produced even after a single session of EMDR therapy. However, the mechanisms producing the improvement and, in particular, the effect of bilateral stimulation are not precisely known. More research is needed in this regard since bilateral stimulation is the most controversial part and with less evidence found. In addition to this, there are very few studies that have analyzed the differential efficacy of the presence or absence of bilateral stimulation or of the different types of stimulation possible. As for the comparison between types of stimulation (bilateral with eye movements, or focusing on a fixed point), greater treatment effects have been found for EMDR with fixation on an immobile hand compared to eye movements. The aim of this study is to examine the effectiveness of a comprehensive intervention protocol for people who have experienced traumatic events and present post-traumatic symptomatology. In addition, this study will compare the efficacy of traumatic memory processing with and without dual attention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2022
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 26, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2026
ExpectedApril 25, 2025
April 1, 2025
3.7 years
October 26, 2022
April 22, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change from posttraumatic symptoms at 10 weeks and 6 months
International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ; Cloitre et al., 2018). Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Change baseline, 10 weeks, and 6 months
Change from psychopathological symptoms at 10 weeks and 6 months
Symptom Checklist 45-SCL-90R brief (Davison et al., 1997).Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Change baseline, 10 weeks, and 6 months
Change from Dissociative symptoms at 10 weeks and 6 months
Dissociative Experience Scale DES II (Carlson and Putnam, 1993). Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Change baseline, 10 weeks, and 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Change from Well-being at 10 weeks and 6 months
Change baseline, 10 weeks, and 6 months
Change from Satisfaction with life at 10 weeks and 6 months
Change baseline, 10 weeks, and 6 months
Change from Emotion Regulation at 10 weeks and 6 months
Change baseline, 10 weeks, and 6 months
Change from Attachment style at 10 weeks and 6 months
Change baseline, 10 weeks, and 6 months
Study Arms (3)
EMDR+dual attention
ACTIVE COMPARATOR.Processing the trauma with exposition and dual attention.
EMDR + fixed point
ACTIVE COMPARATORProcessing the trauma with exposition and fixed point.
EMDR + exposition
ACTIVE COMPARATORProcessing the trauma with exposition.
Interventions
This is a individual intervention with a total of 10 sessions. In the processing the traumatic event phase will be realized with double attention.
This is a individual intervention with a total of 10 sessions. In the processing the traumatic event phase will be realized with fixed point.
This is a individual intervention with a total of 10 sessions. In the processing the traumatic event phase will be realized with exposition.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Be between the ages of 18 and 65 fluent enough in Spanish language; 2.
You may not qualify if:
- Present severe active suicidal ideation, or have made a self-injurious attempt during the last month.
- Present a diagnosis of substance dependence, intellectual disability or severe cognitive dysfunction.
- Having received EMDR treatment in the last 6 months.
- Also excluded from the program are those people who cannot guarantee continuity in the therapeutic process.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Carmen Valiente
Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, 28223, Spain
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 26, 2022
First Posted
November 1, 2022
Study Start
September 1, 2022
Primary Completion
April 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Last Updated
April 25, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Study Protocol Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) Informed Consent Form (ICF) Clinical Study Report (CSR) Analytic Code