Study Stopped
Recruitment difficulties
Modified Herbst Approach to Improve Chin Projection
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will collect data to try to assess which one of the two management options works better. The first option involves the use of the bite corrector first and then braces, while the second option involves the temporary addition of small support bone screws with the bite corrector later and then braces. Currently, it is not clearly known if there are important differences between the proposed management options. Such approaches are conventionally used in orthodontic practices. The information collected in this study will be used to compare the differences in the nature of the facial, teeth, and bone changes after the treatment. Questions about the experience while using the devices will be asked.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Aug 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 11, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 28, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 25, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2025
CompletedAugust 6, 2025
July 1, 2025
1.9 years
October 11, 2022
July 31, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Skeletal chin prominence
Assess if the modified Herbst approach produces a more prominent chin protrusion than the one produced by the conventional Herbst. The distance in mm between the skeletal chin and a perpendicular virtual reference line will be calculated.
1 year
Lower incisor inclination
Assess if the modified Herbst approach produces less incisor inclination than the conventional Herbst approach. The angulation in degrees between the lower incisor and the mandibular plane will be calculated.
1 year
Overall quality of life
Assess if the overall quality of life is different than the one with the conventional Herbst approach. The CPQ11-14 ISF questionnaire will be used to assess oral health-related quality of life. The range of possible values es between 0 and 32. Lower values implied better perceived QoL.
1 year
Oral health-related quality of life
Assess if the oral health-related quality of life is different than the one with the conventional Herbst approach. The EuroQoL questionnaire will be used to assess oral health-related quality of life. The index calculates a value between 0 and 1. A higher value implies better QoL.
1 year
Soft tissue Chin prominence
Assess if the modified Herbst approach produces a more prominent chin protrusion. The distance in mm between the lower lip and a perpendicular virtual reference line will be calculated
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Maxillary lip prominence
1 year
Mandibular lip prominence
1 year
Upper incisor inclination
1 year
Study Arms (4)
Class II type A malocclusion - proclination of upper incisors indicated - No TADs
ACTIVE COMPARATORA hybrid Herbst appliance approach will be used (current available conventional treatment). The upper jaw component will be a maxillary expander secured on the first molar bands. The lower arch would have an uncemented lower acrylic full-coverage splint-type. In between Herbst-type pistons will be used. Upper brackets will be initially bonded and upper incisors proclined until normal inclination values are attained.
Class II type B malocclusion - proclination of upper incisors not indicated - No TADs
ACTIVE COMPARATORA hybrid Herbst appliance approach will be used (current available conventional treatment). The upper jaw component will be a maxillary expander secured on the first molar bands. The lower arch would have an uncemented lower acrylic full-coverage splint-type. In between Herbst-type pistons will be used.
Class II type A malocclusion - proclination of upper incisors indicated - TADs
EXPERIMENTALA modified hybrid Herbst appliance approach (same hybrid Herbst appliance approach but with the addition of temporary anchorage devices (TADs) in both arches) will be used (alternative treatment). In the upper arch, the TADs would be inserted in the paramedical palatal area. In the lower arch, they would be inserted buccally between the roots of the lower second premolar and the first permanent molar. Elastomeric chains will be used to link these TADs to the first molars in the upper arch and to a buccal bottom on the lower canines. Upper brackets will be initially bonded and upper incisors proclined until normal inclination values are attained.
Class II type B malocclusion - proclination of upper incisors not indicated - TADs
EXPERIMENTALCA modified hybrid Herbst appliance approach (same hybrid Herbst appliance approach but with the addition of temporary anchorage devices (TADs) in both arches) will be used (alternative treatment). In the upper arch, the TADs would be inserted in the paramedical palatal area. In the lower arch, they would be inserted buccally between the roots of the lower second premolar and the first permanent molar. Elastomeric chains will be used to link these TADs to the first molars in the upper arch and to a buccal bottom on the lower canines.
Interventions
A modified hybrid Herbst appliance approach (same hybrid Herbst appliance approach but with the addition of temporary anchorage devices (TADs) in both arches) will be used (alternative treatment). In the upper arch, the TADs would be inserted in the paramedical palatal area. In the lower arch, they would be inserted buccally between the roots of the lower second premolar and the first permanent molar. Elastomeric chains will be used to link these TADs to the first molars in the upper arch and to a buccal bottom on the lower canines. Upper brackets will be initially bonded and upper incisors proclined until normal inclination values are attained.
A hybrid Herbst appliance approach will be used (current available conventional treatment). The upper jaw component will be a maxillary expander secured on the first molar bands. The lower arch would have an uncemented lower acrylic full-coverage splint-type. In between Herbst-type pistons will be used.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Class II skeletal malocclusion based on PgOLp more than 85 mm and A-OLp more than 75 mm.
- Perceived potential improvement of facial convexity.
- At least end-to-end bilateral molar relationship.
- Early permanent dentition.
- No congenitally missing teeth.
You may not qualify if:
- Class II skeletal malocclusion based on PgOLp less than 85 mm and A-OLp less than 75 mm.
- Only reasonable management option is surgery.
- Less than an end-to-end bilateral molar relationship.
- Mixed dentition dentition.
- Congenitally missing teeth.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2C8, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Carlos Flores Mir, DSc
University of Alberta
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The patient and care provider can't be masked as it is obvious what appliance modification is being used.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 11, 2022
First Posted
October 28, 2022
Study Start
August 25, 2023
Primary Completion
July 31, 2025
Study Completion
July 31, 2025
Last Updated
August 6, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Only the participant's unique ID is stored as personal identifying information. To be able to link this ID to specific participant identifiable information access to our password-protected health database would be needed.