Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Block vs Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block
Comparison Between Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Block vs Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block in Lumbar Spine Surgeries;Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
180
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Aim of this Study will be to compare Ultrasound guided erector spinae block vs thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block in lumbar spine surgeries.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 29, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 20, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 27, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 20, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 20, 2024
CompletedNovember 25, 2024
November 1, 2024
1.9 years
September 29, 2022
November 21, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Total postoperative fentanyl requirements
Total postoperative fentanyl requirements
24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (3)
pain score at rest and during movement
24 hours
time of first postoperative analgesic request
24 hours
opioids side effects
24 hours
Study Arms (3)
control group
PLACEBO COMPARATORPatients will not recieve either erector spinae plane block nor thoracolumbar interfascial plane block
Erector spinae plane block
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will recieve ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block.
Thoracolumbar interfascial plane block
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will recieve ultrasound guided thoracolumbar interfascial plane block.
Interventions
Induction of anesthesia will be by IV propofol (2-2.5 mg/kg)
Fentanyl will be injected during the induction of anesthesia (1-1.5 mg/kg)
Rocuronium will be injected during induction of anesthesia (0.6 mg/ kg)
Sevoflurane inhalationa anesthesia will be used for maintainance of anesthesia
In the ESPB group, the probe will be placed in the parasagittal plane at the level of the L3 vertebrae. The spinous process will be visualized, and the probe will move 3 cm laterally from the midline. The erector spinae muscle will be visualized above the transverse process. The needle will be punctured in the craniocaudal direction using the in-plane technique. The needle will be directed superior to the transverse process . Then, 2 mL normal saline solution was injected into the deep fascia of the erector spinae muscle to confirm the proper injection site. After ensuring the location of the needle, 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered. The same ESPB procedure will be performed on the other side. In total, 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered.
In the mTLIP group, the probe will be placed vertically at the L3 vertebrae level. The spinous process and the interspinous muscles (i.e., multifidus, longissimus, and iliocostalis) will be visualized as the anatomic guide points. The probe will move laterally to identify the longissimus and iliocostalis muscles. The needle will be inserted between the longissimus and iliocostalis in the medial-to-lateral direction using the in-plane technique. After confirming the location of the needle, 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered. The same mTLIP procedure will be performed on the opposite side. In total, 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification as ASA I-II.
You may not qualify if:
- coagulation abnormality
- anticoagulant treatment,
- allergies to local anesthetics,
- skin infections at the site of block area,
- pregnancy or lactation,
- refusal to participate in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Tanta Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Mona Mohamed Mogahed
Tanta, Elgharbia, 31511, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 29, 2022
First Posted
October 27, 2022
Study Start
October 20, 2022
Primary Completion
September 20, 2024
Study Completion
September 20, 2024
Last Updated
November 25, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share