NCT05588583

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to follow the progress of wounds in those with venous leg ulcers and diabetic foot ulcers while using an absorbent dressing called Mepilex Up. The main objective is to follow the progress of these wounds over time from initial visit to each follow-up visit. Participants will be asked to wear Mepilex Up dressing for up to 6 weeks of treatment or until healed, changed at every one-week interval.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
68

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

4 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 14, 2022

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 20, 2022

Completed
11 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 31, 2022

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

April 20, 2023

Status Verified

October 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

October 14, 2022

Last Update Submit

April 18, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Diabetic Foot UlcerVenous Leg Ulcer

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Wound progress of the total effect of treatment using Mepilex Up

    Wound progress is the total effect of treatment using Mepilex Up as the absorbent dressing and includes the changes in an objectively measured wound area and subjectively evaluated wound condition by the treating investigator/designee. Wound progress will be assessed as deteriorated, no change, improved, or healed at each visit. Wound area will be measured by an independent evaluator assisted by digital software at each visit and recorded as cm2 using the formula, A= π\*L\*W/4.

    From baseline visit to last follow-up visit, a maximum total treatment period of 44 days or until healed, whichever occurs first.

Secondary Outcomes (28)

  • Percentage wound area reduction over time

    From baseline visit to last follow-up visit, a maximum total treatment period of 44 days or until healed, whichever occurs first.

  • Percentage wound volume reduction over time (DFUs only)

    From baseline visit to last follow-up visit, a maximum total treatment period of 44 days or until healed, whichever occurs first.

  • Linear wound healing over time

    From baseline visit to last follow-up visit, a maximum total treatment period of 44 days or until healed, whichever occurs first.

  • Change in granulation tissue over time

    From baseline visit to last follow-up visit, a maximum total treatment period of 44 days or until healed, whichever occurs first.

  • Change in sloughy tissue over time

    From baseline visit to last follow-up visit, a maximum total treatment period of 44 days or until healed, whichever occurs first.

  • +23 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Supportive Care with Mepilex Up

EXPERIMENTAL

All Subjects will use a soft, silicone, non-bordered, adhesive, foam dressing called Mepilex Up as the absorbent primary dressing.

Device: Mepilex Up

Interventions

Mepilex Up is a highly conformable dressing that absorbs both low and high viscous exudates, maintains a moist wound environment and minimises the risk of maceration. The dressing has a Safetac® wound contact layer that is a unique adhesive technology. It minimises pain to patients and trauma to wounds and the surrounding skin at dressing removal. Mepilex Up consists of: * a soft silicone wound contact layer (Safetac) * a flexible absorbent pad of compressed polyurethane foam * an outer polyurethane film which is breathable but waterproof Dressing material content: Silicone, polyurethane

Supportive Care with Mepilex Up

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Signed consent to participate (including consent for digital imaging)
  • Adult aged ≥18 years
  • Diagnosed with a chronic, exuding VLU or DFU
  • Exudate amount moderate to large
  • Wound size from 3 cm2 to 30 cm2 for VLU and ≥1 cm2 for DFU, as determined by the clinician
  • For VLU: ABPI (within 3 months) \> 0.7. If ABPI \> 1.4, then big toe pressure \> 60 mmHg is required or an alternative measurement verifying normal distal arterial flow
  • For VLU: Willing to be compliant with compression therapy

You may not qualify if:

  • Infected ulcer according to the judgment of the investigator defined as any wound condition requiring the prescription or continuation of systemic antibiotic therapy at enrollment
  • Circumferential wound
  • Known allergy/hypersensitivity to the materials of the dressing
  • Patients participating in the DIPLO NBF study
  • Use of wound fillers

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (4)

Center for Clinical Research, Inc.

Castro Valley, California, 94546, United States

RECRUITING

Felix Sigal, DPM

Los Angeles, California, 90010, United States

RECRUITING

University of Miami

Miami, Florida, 33125, United States

RECRUITING

Serena Group Research Institute

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15222, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (18)

  • Gould L, Abadir P, Brem H, Carter M, Conner-Kerr T, Davidson J, DiPietro L, Falanga V, Fife C, Gardner S, Grice E, Harmon J, Hazzard WR, High KP, Houghton P, Jacobson N, Kirsner RS, Kovacs EJ, Margolis D, McFarland Horne F, Reed MJ, Sullivan DH, Thom S, Tomic-Canic M, Walston J, Whitney J, Williams J, Zieman S, Schmader K. Chronic wound repair and healing in older adults: current status and future research. Wound Repair Regen. 2015 Jan-Feb;23(1):1-13. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12245. Epub 2015 Feb 13.

    PMID: 25486905BACKGROUND
  • Tickle J. Wound exudate: a survey of current understanding and clinical competency. Br J Nurs. 2016 Jan 28-Feb 10;25(2):102-9. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2016.25.2.102.

    PMID: 27119542BACKGROUND
  • Gonzalez de la Torre H, Quintana-Lorenzo ML, Perdomo-Perez E, Verdu J. Correlation between health-related quality of life and venous leg ulcer's severity and characteristics: a cross-sectional study. Int Wound J. 2017 Apr;14(2):360-368. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12610. Epub 2016 Apr 25.

    PMID: 27112627BACKGROUND
  • Jones JE, Robinson J, Barr W, Carlisle C. Impact of exudate and odour from chronic venous leg ulceration. Nurs Stand. 2008 Jul 16-22;22(45):53-4, 56, 58 passim. doi: 10.7748/ns2008.07.22.45.53.c6592.

    PMID: 18686695BACKGROUND
  • Maume S, Van De Looverbosch D, Heyman H, Romanelli M, Ciangherotti A, Charpin S. A study to compare a new self-adherent soft silicone dressing with a self-adherent polymer dressing in stage II pressure ulcers. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2003 Sep;49(9):44-51.

    PMID: 14581709BACKGROUND
  • Moore Z, Strapp H. Managing the problem of excess exudate. Br J Nurs. 2015 Aug 13-Sep 19;24(15):S12, S14-7. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2015.24.Sup15.S12.

    PMID: 26266558BACKGROUND
  • Rippon M, Davies P, White R. Taking the trauma out of wound care: the importance of undisturbed healing. J Wound Care. 2012 Aug;21(8):359-60, 362, 364-8. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2012.21.8.359.

    PMID: 22885308BACKGROUND
  • Gorin DR, Cordts PR, LaMorte WW, Manzoian JO. The influence of wound geometry on the measurement of wound healing rates in clinical trials. J Vasc Surg. 1996 Mar;23(3):524-8. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(96)80021-8.

    PMID: 8601898BACKGROUND
  • Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF, Caraceni A, Hanks GW, Loge JH, Fainsinger R, Aass N, Kaasa S; European Palliative Care Research Collaborative (EPCRC). Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Jun;41(6):1073-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.08.016.

    PMID: 21621130BACKGROUND
  • Augustin M, Conde Montero E, Zander N, Baade K, Herberger K, Debus ES, Diener H, Neubert T, Blome C. Validity and feasibility of the wound-QoL questionnaire on health-related quality of life in chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 2017 Sep;25(5):852-857. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12583. Epub 2017 Nov 2.

    PMID: 29080332BACKGROUND
  • Rippon M WM, Bielfeldt S. An evaluation of properties related to wear time of four dressings during a five-day period. Wounds UK. 2015;11(1):45-54.

    BACKGROUND
  • Young T, Clark M, Augustin M, Carville K, Curran J, Flour M, et al. International consensus. Optimising wellbeing in people living with a wound. An expert working group review. Wounds International; London 2012.

    BACKGROUND
  • Chadwick P, McCardle J. Exudate management using a gelling fibre dressing. The Diabetic Foot Journal. 2015;18(1):43-8.

    BACKGROUND
  • World Union of Wound Healing Societies (WUWHS). Principles of best practice: Wound exudate and the role of dressings. A consensus document. 2019.

    BACKGROUND
  • European Wound Management Association (EWMA). Position document: Wound bed preparation in practice. London: MEP Ltd. 2004.

    BACKGROUND
  • Romanelli M, Vowden K, Weir D. Exudate Management Made Easy Wounds International 2010.

    BACKGROUND
  • Walker M, Parsons D. Hydrofiber® technology: its role in exudate management. Wounds UK; 2010. p. 31-38.

    BACKGROUND
  • Fletcher J. Development of a new wound assessment form, Clinical practice development. Wounds UK. 2010;6(1).

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Wounds and InjuriesFoot InjuriesDiabetic FootVaricose Ulcer

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Leg InjuriesDiabetic AngiopathiesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesFoot UlcerLeg UlcerSkin UlcerSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesDiabetes ComplicationsDiabetes MellitusEndocrine System DiseasesDiabetic NeuropathiesVaricose Veins

Study Officials

  • Hadar Lev-Tov, MD, MAS

    University of Miami

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Janet Kandrevas, MD, MS

CONTACT

Andrea Picchietti, MS, CCRA

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: The model is a prospective, open, multi-center, interventional, non-comparative investigation with the aim to follow exuding chronic wound progression for 6 weeks according to local standard of care.
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 14, 2022

First Posted

October 20, 2022

Study Start

October 31, 2022

Primary Completion

March 1, 2024

Study Completion

March 1, 2024

Last Updated

April 20, 2023

Record last verified: 2022-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations