A Clinical Investigation to Follow the Progress of Exuding Chronic Wounds Using Mepilex® Up as the Primary Dressing.
A Prospective, Open, Multi-Center, Interventional, Non-Comparative Clinical Investigation to Follow the Progress of Exuding Chronic Wounds Using Mepilex® Up
1 other identifier
interventional
68
1 country
4
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to follow the progress of wounds in those with venous leg ulcers and diabetic foot ulcers while using an absorbent dressing called Mepilex Up. The main objective is to follow the progress of these wounds over time from initial visit to each follow-up visit. Participants will be asked to wear Mepilex Up dressing for up to 6 weeks of treatment or until healed, changed at every one-week interval.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2022
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 14, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 20, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 31, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2024
CompletedApril 20, 2023
October 1, 2022
1.3 years
October 14, 2022
April 18, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Wound progress of the total effect of treatment using Mepilex Up
Wound progress is the total effect of treatment using Mepilex Up as the absorbent dressing and includes the changes in an objectively measured wound area and subjectively evaluated wound condition by the treating investigator/designee. Wound progress will be assessed as deteriorated, no change, improved, or healed at each visit. Wound area will be measured by an independent evaluator assisted by digital software at each visit and recorded as cm2 using the formula, A= π\*L\*W/4.
From baseline visit to last follow-up visit, a maximum total treatment period of 44 days or until healed, whichever occurs first.
Secondary Outcomes (28)
Percentage wound area reduction over time
From baseline visit to last follow-up visit, a maximum total treatment period of 44 days or until healed, whichever occurs first.
Percentage wound volume reduction over time (DFUs only)
From baseline visit to last follow-up visit, a maximum total treatment period of 44 days or until healed, whichever occurs first.
Linear wound healing over time
From baseline visit to last follow-up visit, a maximum total treatment period of 44 days or until healed, whichever occurs first.
Change in granulation tissue over time
From baseline visit to last follow-up visit, a maximum total treatment period of 44 days or until healed, whichever occurs first.
Change in sloughy tissue over time
From baseline visit to last follow-up visit, a maximum total treatment period of 44 days or until healed, whichever occurs first.
- +23 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Supportive Care with Mepilex Up
EXPERIMENTALAll Subjects will use a soft, silicone, non-bordered, adhesive, foam dressing called Mepilex Up as the absorbent primary dressing.
Interventions
Mepilex Up is a highly conformable dressing that absorbs both low and high viscous exudates, maintains a moist wound environment and minimises the risk of maceration. The dressing has a Safetac® wound contact layer that is a unique adhesive technology. It minimises pain to patients and trauma to wounds and the surrounding skin at dressing removal. Mepilex Up consists of: * a soft silicone wound contact layer (Safetac) * a flexible absorbent pad of compressed polyurethane foam * an outer polyurethane film which is breathable but waterproof Dressing material content: Silicone, polyurethane
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Signed consent to participate (including consent for digital imaging)
- Adult aged ≥18 years
- Diagnosed with a chronic, exuding VLU or DFU
- Exudate amount moderate to large
- Wound size from 3 cm2 to 30 cm2 for VLU and ≥1 cm2 for DFU, as determined by the clinician
- For VLU: ABPI (within 3 months) \> 0.7. If ABPI \> 1.4, then big toe pressure \> 60 mmHg is required or an alternative measurement verifying normal distal arterial flow
- For VLU: Willing to be compliant with compression therapy
You may not qualify if:
- Infected ulcer according to the judgment of the investigator defined as any wound condition requiring the prescription or continuation of systemic antibiotic therapy at enrollment
- Circumferential wound
- Known allergy/hypersensitivity to the materials of the dressing
- Patients participating in the DIPLO NBF study
- Use of wound fillers
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
Center for Clinical Research, Inc.
Castro Valley, California, 94546, United States
Felix Sigal, DPM
Los Angeles, California, 90010, United States
University of Miami
Miami, Florida, 33125, United States
Serena Group Research Institute
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15222, United States
Related Publications (18)
Gould L, Abadir P, Brem H, Carter M, Conner-Kerr T, Davidson J, DiPietro L, Falanga V, Fife C, Gardner S, Grice E, Harmon J, Hazzard WR, High KP, Houghton P, Jacobson N, Kirsner RS, Kovacs EJ, Margolis D, McFarland Horne F, Reed MJ, Sullivan DH, Thom S, Tomic-Canic M, Walston J, Whitney J, Williams J, Zieman S, Schmader K. Chronic wound repair and healing in older adults: current status and future research. Wound Repair Regen. 2015 Jan-Feb;23(1):1-13. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12245. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
PMID: 25486905BACKGROUNDTickle J. Wound exudate: a survey of current understanding and clinical competency. Br J Nurs. 2016 Jan 28-Feb 10;25(2):102-9. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2016.25.2.102.
PMID: 27119542BACKGROUNDGonzalez de la Torre H, Quintana-Lorenzo ML, Perdomo-Perez E, Verdu J. Correlation between health-related quality of life and venous leg ulcer's severity and characteristics: a cross-sectional study. Int Wound J. 2017 Apr;14(2):360-368. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12610. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
PMID: 27112627BACKGROUNDJones JE, Robinson J, Barr W, Carlisle C. Impact of exudate and odour from chronic venous leg ulceration. Nurs Stand. 2008 Jul 16-22;22(45):53-4, 56, 58 passim. doi: 10.7748/ns2008.07.22.45.53.c6592.
PMID: 18686695BACKGROUNDMaume S, Van De Looverbosch D, Heyman H, Romanelli M, Ciangherotti A, Charpin S. A study to compare a new self-adherent soft silicone dressing with a self-adherent polymer dressing in stage II pressure ulcers. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2003 Sep;49(9):44-51.
PMID: 14581709BACKGROUNDMoore Z, Strapp H. Managing the problem of excess exudate. Br J Nurs. 2015 Aug 13-Sep 19;24(15):S12, S14-7. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2015.24.Sup15.S12.
PMID: 26266558BACKGROUNDRippon M, Davies P, White R. Taking the trauma out of wound care: the importance of undisturbed healing. J Wound Care. 2012 Aug;21(8):359-60, 362, 364-8. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2012.21.8.359.
PMID: 22885308BACKGROUNDGorin DR, Cordts PR, LaMorte WW, Manzoian JO. The influence of wound geometry on the measurement of wound healing rates in clinical trials. J Vasc Surg. 1996 Mar;23(3):524-8. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(96)80021-8.
PMID: 8601898BACKGROUNDHjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF, Caraceni A, Hanks GW, Loge JH, Fainsinger R, Aass N, Kaasa S; European Palliative Care Research Collaborative (EPCRC). Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Jun;41(6):1073-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.08.016.
PMID: 21621130BACKGROUNDAugustin M, Conde Montero E, Zander N, Baade K, Herberger K, Debus ES, Diener H, Neubert T, Blome C. Validity and feasibility of the wound-QoL questionnaire on health-related quality of life in chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 2017 Sep;25(5):852-857. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12583. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
PMID: 29080332BACKGROUNDRippon M WM, Bielfeldt S. An evaluation of properties related to wear time of four dressings during a five-day period. Wounds UK. 2015;11(1):45-54.
BACKGROUNDYoung T, Clark M, Augustin M, Carville K, Curran J, Flour M, et al. International consensus. Optimising wellbeing in people living with a wound. An expert working group review. Wounds International; London 2012.
BACKGROUNDChadwick P, McCardle J. Exudate management using a gelling fibre dressing. The Diabetic Foot Journal. 2015;18(1):43-8.
BACKGROUNDWorld Union of Wound Healing Societies (WUWHS). Principles of best practice: Wound exudate and the role of dressings. A consensus document. 2019.
BACKGROUNDEuropean Wound Management Association (EWMA). Position document: Wound bed preparation in practice. London: MEP Ltd. 2004.
BACKGROUNDRomanelli M, Vowden K, Weir D. Exudate Management Made Easy Wounds International 2010.
BACKGROUNDWalker M, Parsons D. Hydrofiber® technology: its role in exudate management. Wounds UK; 2010. p. 31-38.
BACKGROUNDFletcher J. Development of a new wound assessment form, Clinical practice development. Wounds UK. 2010;6(1).
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hadar Lev-Tov, MD, MAS
University of Miami
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 14, 2022
First Posted
October 20, 2022
Study Start
October 31, 2022
Primary Completion
March 1, 2024
Study Completion
March 1, 2024
Last Updated
April 20, 2023
Record last verified: 2022-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share