NCT05588518

Brief Summary

Fluoridated desensitizers the frequently used for the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity (DH) with Iontophoresis. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the immediate and long-term effects of 10% Propolis with 2% sodium fluoride and 1.23% acidulated phosphate fluoride when applied along with Iontophoresis for the treatment of cervical dentin hypersensitivity (DH). Single-center, parallel, and double-blinded randomized clinical trials were conducted on systemically healthy patients, complaining about DH, with at least two sites. 10% propolis, 2% Sodium Fluoride and 1.23% Acidulated Phosphate Fluoride were used as desensitizers along with the Iontophoresis. After applying specific stimuli any decrease in DH was measured at baseline before and after application, on the 14th day after use, and at 28th-day post-intervention time intervals.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
75

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2019

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2019

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2020

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2020

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 15, 2022

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 20, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

October 20, 2022

Status Verified

October 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

October 15, 2022

Last Update Submit

October 18, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Dental calculusDentine sensitivityGingival recession

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • reduced dentin hypersensitivity

    significant reduction in dentin hypersensitivity

    baseline (0 day) to 28th day

Study Arms (3)

test group-1- 10% propolis

EXPERIMENTAL

10% propolis desensitizer, a pea-sized quantity was smeared over the test tooth. Subsequently, Iontophoresis was applied immediately. The desensitizing agent was administered at two intervals, immediately after oral prophylaxis and at the 14th-day visit.

Combination Product: desensitizing agents -10% Propolis

test group -2- 2% sodium fluoride

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

2% sodium fluoride desensitizer, a pea-sized quantity was smeared over the test tooth. Subsequently, Iontophoresis was applied immediately. The desensitizing agent was administered at two intervals, immediately after oral prophylaxis and at the 14th-day visit.

Combination Product: desensitizing agents -10% Propolis

test group-3- 1.23% acidulated phosphate fluoride

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

1.23% acidulated phosphate fluoride desensitizer, a pea-sized quantity was smeared over the test tooth. Subsequently, Iontophoresis was applied immediately. The desensitizing agent was administered at two intervals, immediately after oral prophylaxis and at the 14th-day visit.

Combination Product: desensitizing agents -10% Propolis

Interventions

10% propolis was prepared after mixing with 70% ethanol and distilled water based on the method described previously. Propolis and ethanol mixture was allowed to stay in dark place for two weeks. The mixture was stirred everyday intermittently for two weeks. Later the mixture was strained twice using filter paper to remove impurities. Propolis in general are fairly stable without losing its antibacterial properties for over 12 months when stored without direct sunlight and at cool temperatures. Alcohol based extracts will have extended shelf life and hence ethanol-extracted propolis prepared was stored in dark amber colored bottle without any preservatives.

test group -2- 2% sodium fluoridetest group-1- 10% propolistest group-3- 1.23% acidulated phosphate fluoride

Eligibility Criteria

Age25 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Systemically healthy (based on the medical and drug history.), needing oral prophylaxis with moderate calculus (subjects who have moderately poor oral hygiene and needs teeth cleaning), at least two non-adjacent hypersensitive teeth with Schiff scale score as \>1 with air blast stimulus and availability of a minimum of 10 evaluable natural teeth excluding third molars.

You may not qualify if:

  • Undergoing orthodontic therapy, undertreatment for DH/using desensitizing dentifrice, pregnant women, any history of periodontal treatment before three months, any history of asthma, allergic to honey bee products and pollen, teeth with dental caries, attrition, abrasion, erosion, and lack of vitality.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

College of Dentistry King Khalid University

Abhā, 'Asir Region, 65412, Saudi Arabia

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Purra AR, Mushtaq M, Acharya SR, Saraswati V. A comparative evaluation of propolis and 5.0% potassium nitrate as a dentine desensitizer: A clinical study. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2014 Jul;18(4):466-71. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.138695.

    PMID: 25210261BACKGROUND
  • Torwane NA, Hongal S, Goel P, Chandrashekar BR, Jain M, Saxena E. A clinical efficacy of 30% ethenolic extract of Indian propolis and Recaldent in management of dentinal hypersensitivity: A comparative randomized clinical trial. Eur J Dent. 2013 Oct;7(4):461-468. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.120675.

    PMID: 24932122BACKGROUND
  • Madhavan S, Nayak M, Shenoy A, Shetty R, Prasad K. Dentinal hypersensitivity: A comparative clinical evaluation of CPP-ACP F, sodium fluoride, propolis, and placebo. J Conserv Dent. 2012 Oct;15(4):315-8. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.101882.

    PMID: 23112475BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dental CalculusDentin SensitivityGingival Recession

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Dental DepositsTooth DiseasesStomatognathic DiseasesCalculiPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsGingival DiseasesPeriodontal DiseasesMouth DiseasesPeriodontal Atrophy

Study Officials

  • Raghavendra R Nagate, MDS

    King Khalid University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 15, 2022

First Posted

October 20, 2022

Study Start

April 1, 2019

Primary Completion

February 1, 2020

Study Completion

August 1, 2020

Last Updated

October 20, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations