Stabilometric and Baropodometric Evaluation After Osteopathic Scaphoid Tug Manipulation
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a clinical, longitudinal, prospective and randomised study in which the subject will be assessed by stabilometric and baropodometric techniques on two occasions (before being subjected to the scaphoid tug manipulation for the experimental group or placebo technique in the case of the control group).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 10, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 18, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 18, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 18, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 7, 2023
CompletedFebruary 8, 2023
February 1, 2023
Same day
October 10, 2022
February 7, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
stabilometric measurements: oscillation about the X-axis
(mm)
five minutes post-intervention
stabilometric measurements: oscillation about the Y-axis
(mm)
five minutes post-intervention
stabilometric measurements: area of the ellipse
(cm2)
five minutes post-intervention
static baropodometric measurements: scan Foot bearing area
(cm2)
five minutes post-intervention
static baropodometric measurements: scan percentage of body load supported by each foot
five minutes post-intervention
static baropodometric measurements: scan point of maximum plantar pressure
(kg/cm2)
five minutes post-intervention
Study Arms (2)
Experimental: Osteopathic manipulation TUG for scaphoid bone
EXPERIMENTALSham group: Sham osteopathic manipulation TUG for scaphoid bone
SHAM COMPARATORInterventions
The sequence of execution of the scaphoid TUG technique shall be applied as follows. Patient in the supine position. The inner hand of the intervener makes contact with the pisiform through the hypothenar eminence and ulnar border of the hand over the scaphoid tubercle, the outer hand reinforces the contact. The thumbs are directed to the sole of the patient's foot. The parameters are sought by bringing the sole of the foot into eversion, thus bringing the scaphoid into internal rotation (the direction of correction). In order to reduce the slack, the operator drops his body weight backwards while increasing the internal rotation parameter of the scaphoid. The manipulation is performed by associating a rapid traction movement with an increase of the correction parameter towards the internal rotation of the scaphoid.
The intervention will be performed in the same way as the intervention group, without actually performing the TUG manipulation on the scaphoid bone, only placing it in tension.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects with right scaphoid external rotation dysfunction
You may not qualify if:
- Suffering from disorders that alter balance (tension headaches, vertigo, migraines...).
- Deformities, orthopaedic injuries or sequelae in the limbs or spine that may alter postural statics (valgus-varus, lower limb operations, lower limb dysmetries, scoliosis, etc.).
- Pathologies or sequelae related to the postural sensors or disorders in the same:
- Uncorrected visual defects.
- Vestibular disorders.
- Uncorrected stomatological disorders.
- Sensory alterations in the foot sensor (Hypoaesthesia, Morton's neuroma, tarsal canal syndrome, etc.).
- Cutaneous alterations that influence the foot pick-up (papillomas, plantar warts, ingrown toenails, etc.).
- Ingestion of medication that alters the perception of stability.
- Having any contraindication to the scaphoid tug technique.
- Having carried out intense physical activity immediately prior to the study.
- Having received osteopathic treatment in the last month.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sergio Montero Navarro
Elche, Alicante, 03204, Spain
Related Publications (5)
Latash ML, Krishnamoorthy V, Scholz JP, Zatsiorsky VM. Postural synergies and their development. Neural Plast. 2005;12(2-3):119-30; discussion 263-72. doi: 10.1155/NP.2005.119.
PMID: 16097480BACKGROUNDZhang Y, Kiemel T, Jeka J. The influence of sensory information on two-component coordination during quiet stance. Gait Posture. 2007 Jul;26(2):263-71. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.09.007. Epub 2006 Oct 13.
PMID: 17046262BACKGROUNDMyklebust JB, Prieto T, Myklebust B. Evaluation of nonlinear dynamics in postural steadiness time series. Ann Biomed Eng. 1995 Nov-Dec;23(6):711-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02584470.
PMID: 8572421BACKGROUNDHessert MJ, Vyas M, Leach J, Hu K, Lipsitz LA, Novak V. Foot pressure distribution during walking in young and old adults. BMC Geriatr. 2005 May 19;5:8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-5-8.
PMID: 15943881BACKGROUNDVan Buskirk RL. Nociceptive reflexes and the somatic dysfunction: a model. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1990 Sep;90(9):792-4, 797-809.
PMID: 2211195BACKGROUND
Related Links
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- SINGLE BLIND (PARTICIPANT)
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 10, 2022
First Posted
October 18, 2022
Study Start
October 18, 2022
Primary Completion
October 18, 2022
Study Completion
February 7, 2023
Last Updated
February 8, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-02