Trunk Control, Balance, Gait, Functional Mobility and Fear of Falling in People With Alzheimer's Disease

NCT05576688 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: 2022/30/09
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 68
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

The purposes of this study were to investigate the relationship between trunk control and balance, gait, functional mobility, and fear of falling in people with Alzheimer's disease and to compare trunk control, balance, gait, functional mobility, and fear of falling in people with Alzheimer's disease and healthy older adults. Balance, an essential motor skill necessary to perform both static and dynamic everyday activities with stability and security, is impaired in people with Alzheimer's disease when compared to cognitively preserved elderlies. Gait and functional mobility disorders are also observed in people with Alzheimer's disease from the early period of the disease. People with Alzheimer's disease tend to fall more often and are more seriously injured from falls than cognitively intact older adults. The annual incidence rate for falling is 60% to 80% for older adults with Alzheimer's disease, over twice the incidence of age-matched cognitively intact older adults. Trunk control is shown among the most important factors that ensure the balance and walking of the individual in different environments and conditions during functional activities. Optimal trunk control relies on adequate somatosensory, motor, and musculoskeletal systems, which are frequently compromised in people with Alzheimer's disease. For this reason, the investigators think that trunk control may be affected in people with Alzheimer's disease compared to healthy older adults and may be related to balance, gait, functional mobility and fear of falling.

Conditions

Physical Therapy

Keywords

trunk control; balance; gait; functional mobility; fear of falling

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Trunk control

  Trunk control was evaluated with Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS). TIS evaluates static sitting balance, dynamic sitting balance, and trunk coordination on a scale from 0 to 23 points, a higher score indicating a better performance.

  1 month

Secondary Outcomes (7)

• Functional balance

  1 month

• Dynamic bilateral stance balance

  1 month

• One leg standing balance

  1 month

• Balance

  1 month

• Gait

  1 month

Study Arms (2)

Alzheimer's disease

EXPERIMENTAL

People with Alzheimer's disease who were diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease according to NINCDS/ARDRA diagnostic criteria by a neurologist and whose cognitive level was between 18-23 points according to Mini Mental State Examination.

Other: Balance; Other: Trunk control; Other: Gait; Other: Functional mobility; Other: Fear of falling

Healthy older adults

NO INTERVENTION

33 healthy older adults with matching ages and gender.

Interventions

Balance OTHER

Balance was evaluated with Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Functional Reach Test (FRT), One Leg Stance Test (OLST) and Five-Repeat Sit-and-Stand Test (5STS). BBS consists of 14 functional tasks of increasing difficulty, each scored on a scale ranging from 0 to 4. The maximum possible score is 56, indicating no identifiable balance difficulties. FRT measures the maximum distance that participants can reach forward with their dominant arm raised to 90 degrees without moving their feet, which were positioned 10 cm apart. OLST measures the time one is able to stand on one lower limb without support. The test was repeated for both sides. 5STS assesses the time it takes to get up and sit from the chair five times. Measurements were repeated 3 times and the average duration was calculated as a patient score.

Alzheimer's disease

Trunk control OTHER

Trunk control was evaluated with Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS).TIS evaluates static sitting balance, dynamic sitting balance, and trunk coordination on a scale from 0 to 23 points, a higher score indicating a better performance.

Alzheimer's disease

Gait OTHER

Gait was evaluated with Dynamic Gait Index (DGI). DGI has 8 items: walking, walking while changing speed, walking while turning the head horizontally and vertically, walking with pivot turn, walking over and around obstacles, and stair climbing. The scoring of the DGI is based on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 3, with 0 indicating severe impairment and 3 indicating normal ability. The best performance total score is 24. A low composite DGI score indicates greater impairment in gait.

Alzheimer's disease

Functional mobility OTHER

Functional mobility was evaluated with Timed Up and Go Test (TUG). TUG is a test of the time required for an individual to stand up from a chair with armrests, walk 3 m, turn, walk back to the chair, and sit down. The stopwatch timing started when the participant's bottom left the chair and ended when the bottom made contact with the chair after the walk.

Alzheimer's disease

Fear of falling OTHER

Fear of falling was evaluated with the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I). FES-I was used to assess the level of concern about falls during 16 activities of daily living, ranging from basic to more demanding activities including social activities that may contribute to quality of life. It was administered as a self-report questionnaire.

Alzheimer's disease

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 40 Years - 85 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease according to the NINCDS/ARDRA diagnostic criteria by a neurologist.
• Having a cognitive level between 18-23 points according to the Mini Mental Status Examination.
• Must be able to walk independently with and/or without assistive device.

You may not qualify if:

• Having a history of cerebrovascular disease, epilepsy and brain tumor.
• Having a cognitive level below 18 points according to the Mini Mental Status Examination.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University: lead

Study Sites (1)

Giresun University

Giresun, 28200, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Gait

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Physical Examination; Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures; Diagnosis; Walking; Locomotion; Movement; Musculoskeletal Physiological Phenomena; Musculoskeletal and Neural Physiological Phenomena

Study Officials

• Taskin Ozkan, Doctorate

  Giresun University Vocational School of Health Services Therapy and Rehabilitation Department

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: NON RANDOMIZED
• Masking: NONE
• Purpose: SCREENING
• Intervention Model: FACTORIAL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: September 30, 2022
• First Posted: October 12, 2022
• Study Start: December 1, 2021
• Primary Completion: May 1, 2022
• Study Completion: June 1, 2022
• Last Updated: October 13, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-10

Locations

TU (1)