NCT05571488

Brief Summary

The healthcare system is continuously evolving to adapt to the population's needs, both in terms of healthcare practices, and in financial and organizational aspects. The current COVID-19 pandemic has added additional pressure to the healthcare system and shown its limits in terms of preparedness. It has also shown once again that both healthcare professionals (HCPs) and informal caregivers (ICs) play a central role for the functioning of the healthcare system. An increasing number of studies are alerting on HCPs' situation, regarding their physical and mental health (e.g. emotional exhaustion, professional well-being) on the one hand, and the functioning of the healthcare system (e.g. absenteeism, turnover, career change) on the other hand. Besides healthcare professionals, ICs, defined as "a person in the immediate entourage of an individual whose health and/or autonomy is impaired and who requires assistance with certain \[basic or instrumental\] activities of daily living. The IC provides the person, on a non-professional and informal basis, and on a regular basis, with assistance, care or presence services of varying nature and intensity, designed to compensate for their incapacities or difficulties or to ensure their safety, identity and social ties". Caring for others has shown to have negative impact on the ICs' life, in terms of health-related implications, psychological burden, quality of life, etc. Despite being increasingly recognized as having a key role in the provision of care, they have only been limitedly considered in studies on healthcare professionals. In that context, the investigators develop SCOHPICA project, the Swiss cohort of healthcare professionals and informal caregivers, which is an open prospective national cohort using a concurrent embedded mixed method design. This project targets all types of HCPs and ICs, and will investigate determinants of intent to stay and well-being according to participants' trajectories.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
6,000

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
8mo left

Started Oct 2022

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress85%
Oct 2022Dec 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 23, 2022

Completed
8 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2022

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 7, 2022

Completed
3.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 31, 2026

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

January 6, 2026

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3.3 years

First QC Date

September 23, 2022

Last Update Submit

December 31, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Healthcare ProfessionalHealth ProfessionalHealth Care ProfessionalInformal CaregiverInformal CarerCohortSwitzerlandHealth Personnel

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (20)

  • Professional trajectories (HCPs), constructed from socio-professional variables [1]

    Professional trajectories will be formulated based on socio-professional information (current and past occupation, education, work setting, career continuity, part-time contracts). Clustering procedures will be used to group healthcare professionals with similar trajectories, building thus a typology of professional trajectories in the Swiss health workforce.

    At baseline

  • Professional trajectories (HCPs), constructed from socio-professional variables [2]

    Follow-up data will be used to complement the professional trajectories constructed on baseline socio-professional information. Changes in the variables which form the trajectories will be assessed and new typologies will be derived from the enhanced trajectories.

    1 year after the baseline

  • Professional trajectories (HCPs), constructed from socio-professional variables [3]

    Follow-up data will be used to complement the professional trajectories constructed on baseline socio-professional information. Changes in the variables which form the trajectories will be assessed and new typologies will be derived from the enhanced trajectories.

    2 years after the baseline

  • Professional trajectories (HCPs), constructed from socio-professional variables [4]

    Follow-up data will be used to complement the professional trajectories constructed on baseline socio-professional information. Changes in the variables which form the trajectories will be assessed and new typologies will be derived from the enhanced trajectories.

    3 years after the baseline

  • Professional trajectories (HCPs), constructed from socio-professional variables [5]

    Follow-up data will be used to complement the professional trajectories constructed on baseline socio-professional information. Changes in the variables which form the trajectories will be assessed and new typologies will be derived from the enhanced trajectories.

    4 years after the baseline

  • Intention to stay in the profession/position (HCPs) [1]

    Assessed using two questions: 1) intent to stay in the profession and 2) intent to stay in the current position

    At baseline

  • Intention to stay in the profession/position (HCPs) [2]

    Assessed using two questions: 1) intent to stay in the profession and 2) intent to stay in the current position

    1 year after the baseline

  • Intention to stay in the profession/position (HCPs) [3]

    Assessed using two questions: 1) intent to stay in the profession and 2) intent to stay in the current position

    2 years after the baseline

  • Intention to stay in the profession/position (HCPs) [4]

    Assessed using two questions: 1) intent to stay in the profession and 2) intent to stay in the current position

    3 years after the baseline

  • Intention to stay in the profession/position (HCPs) [5]

    Assessed using two questions: 1) intent to stay in the profession and 2) intent to stay in the current position

    4 years after the baseline

  • Intention to leave the profession/position/health sector (HCPs) [1]

    Assessed using three questions: within next 5 years …1) intent to leave the profession, 2) intent to leave the current position and 3) intent to leave the health sector

    At baseline

  • Intention to leave the profession/position/health sector (HCPs) [2]

    Assessed using three questions: within next 5 years …1) intent to leave the profession, 2) intent to leave the current position and 3) intent to leave the health sector

    1 year after the baseline

  • Intention to leave the profession/position/health sector (HCPs) [3]

    Assessed using three questions: within next 5 years …1) intent to leave the profession, 2) intent to leave the current position and 3) intent to leave the health sector

    2 years after the baseline

  • Intention to leave the profession/position/health sector (HCPs) [4]

    Assessed using three questions: within next 5 years …1) intent to leave the profession, 2) intent to leave the current position and 3) intent to leave the health sector

    3 years after the baseline

  • Intention to leave the profession/position/health sector (HCPs) [5]

    Assessed using three questions: within next 5 years …1) intent to leave the profession, 2) intent to leave the current position and 3) intent to leave the health sector

    4 years after the baseline

  • Well-being (HCPs) [1]

    Assessed using the10 items of the Flourish Index (FI). FI score can range from 0 (lowest response category for the 10 items) to 10 (highest response category for the 10 items). High scores imply that respondents perceive themselves very positively in terms of human flourishing.

    At baseline

  • Well-being (HCPs) [2]

    Assessed using the10 items of the Flourish Index (FI). FI score can range from 0 (lowest response category for the 10 items) to 10 (highest response category for the 10 items). High scores imply that respondents perceive themselves very positively in terms of human flourishing.

    1 year after the baseline

  • Well-being (HCPs) [3]

    Assessed using the10 items of the Flourish Index (FI). FI score can range from 0 (lowest response category for the 10 items) to 10 (highest response category for the 10 items). High scores imply that respondents perceive themselves very positively in terms of human flourishing.

    2 years after the baseline

  • Well-being (HCPs) [4]

    Assessed using the10 items of the Flourish Index (FI). FI score can range from 0 (lowest response category for the 10 items) to 10 (highest response category for the 10 items). High scores imply that respondents perceive themselves very positively in terms of human flourishing.

    3 years after the baseline

  • Well-being (HCPs) [5]

    Assessed using the10 items of the Flourish Index (FI). FI score can range from 0 (lowest response category for the 10 items) to 10 (highest response category for the 10 items). High scores imply that respondents perceive themselves very positively in terms of human flourishing.

    4 years after the baseline

Study Arms (2)

Healthcare professionals

All type of healthcare professionals (HCPs), working in a variety of settings and across Switzerland

Other: Electronic surveysOther: Qualitative Interviews

Informal caregivers

All type of informal caregivers (ICs), aged 18 and over, assisting a person for health reasons across Switzerland

Other: Electronic surveysOther: Qualitative Interviews

Interventions

Online questionnaires is used to collect data, at recruitment and follow-up once a year. For the ICs, paper questionnaire will be provided upon request.

Healthcare professionalsInformal caregivers

Remote focus groups or semi-structured interviews will be proposed to a subsample of the participants, first in 2025 and then every two years

Healthcare professionalsInformal caregivers

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Any type of HCPs, having direct patient-contact and working in any type of settings across Switzerland Any type of informal caregivers (ICs), aged 18 and over, assisting a person for health reasons across Switzerland

You may qualify if:

  • Working as HCP, in any profession
  • Taking care of patients currently and actively
  • Working in any health work setting
  • Working as an independent or a salaried
  • Working in Switzerland

You may not qualify if:

  • Being retired at baseline
  • Unable to read or speak in one of the national languages: German, French, Italian
  • Being informal cargiver
  • Aged 18 and over (adults)
  • Unable to read or speak in one of the national languages: German, French, Italian

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisante), University of Lausanne, Switzerland

Lausanne, 1010, Switzerland

RECRUITING

Related Publications (5)

  • Roth L, Le Saux C, Gilles I, Peytremann-Bridevaux I. Factors Associated With Intent to Leave the Profession for the Allied Health Workforce: A Rapid Review. Med Care Res Rev. 2024 Feb;81(1):3-18. doi: 10.1177/10775587231204105. Epub 2023 Oct 21.

    PMID: 37864432BACKGROUND
  • Peytremann-Bridevaux I, Jolidon V, Jubin J, Zuercher E, Roth L, Escasain L, Carron T, Courvoisier N, Oulevey Bachmann A, Gilles I. Protocol for the Swiss COhort of Healthcare Professionals and Informal CAregivers (SCOHPICA): Professional trajectories, intention to stay in or leave the job and well-being of healthcare professionals. PLoS One. 2024 Aug 29;19(8):e0309665. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309665. eCollection 2024.

    PMID: 39208304BACKGROUND
  • Gilles I, Le Saux C, Zuercher E, Jubin J, Roth L, Bachmann AO, Peytremann-Bridevaux I. Work experiences of healthcare professionals in a shortage context: analysis of open-ended comments in a Swiss cohort (SCOHPICA). BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 9;25(1):520. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12659-z.

  • Roth L, Gilles I, Antille E, Jubin J, Jolidon V, Oulevey-Bachmann A, Peytremann-Bridevaux I. Factors associated with intent to stay in the profession: an exploratory cluster analysis across healthcare professions in Switzerland. Eur J Public Health. 2024 Dec 1;34(6):1146-1148. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckae100.

  • Jolidon V, Jubin J, Zuercher E, Roth L, Carron T, Oulevey Bachmann A, Gilles I, Peytremann-Bridevaux I. Health Workforce Challenges: Key Findings From the Swiss Cohort of Healthcare Professionals and Informal Caregivers (SCOHPICA). Int J Public Health. 2024 Jul 26;69:1607419. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1607419. eCollection 2024.

Related Links

Study Officials

  • Isabelle Peytremann-Bridevaux, MD, DSc, MPH

    Unisanté

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study coordinator

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 23, 2022

First Posted

October 7, 2022

Study Start

October 1, 2022

Primary Completion

January 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Last Updated

January 6, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Metadata will be deposited on DATA@UNISANTE.

Time Frame
The datasets will be accessible a few months after each measure.
Access Criteria
The datasets will be accessible under the following conditions: * After registration, the Lead Researcher needs to fill an application form, including the Data Access Agreement. * Access will only be granted when the Lead Researcher is an employee of a legally registered receiving agency (e.g. university, research center, and national organization) on behalf of which access to the data is requested. * The Lead Researcher assumes all responsibility for compliance with all terms of the Data Access Agreement by employees of the receiving organization. * The request will be reviewed by the Primary Investigator, who may decide to approve the request, to deny access to the data, or to request additional information from the Lead Researcher.
More information

Available IPD Datasets

Individual Participant Data Set (10.16909-dataset-46)Access

Locations