Urine Retention Rate Between Spinal and General Anesthesia for Anorectal Surgery
Pain Score and Urine Retention Rate Between Spinal and General Anesthesia for Anorectal Surgery, Retrospective Observation Study
1 other identifier
observational
1,400
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Anorectal surgery includes pilonidal sinus, hemorrhoidectomy, anal fissure, and anal fistula operations. General and spinal anesthesia were common anesthetic methods in anorectal surgery. We designed this study to test the hypothesis that general anesthesia was superior than spinal anesthesia with respect to urine retention rate, pain score, recovery time, and side effects.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2017
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 5, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 7, 2022
CompletedJanuary 31, 2023
January 1, 2023
5.4 years
October 5, 2022
January 27, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Urine retention rate
urine retention events needs foley catheterization
0-24 hours post operation.
Pain score
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
0-24 hours post operation.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
surgery complications
0-30 days post operative days.
anesthesia complications
0-30 days post operative days.
Study Arms (2)
Anorectal surgery patient under general anesthesia plus local infiltration
Anorectal surgery patient under general anesthesia plus local infiltration
Anorectal surgery patient under spinal anesthesia
Anorectal surgery patient under spinal anesthesia alone
Interventions
The eligible patients underwent anorectal surgery under general anesthesia (GE, GM, IVG) plus locally injected analgesics.
The eligible patients underwent anorectal surgery under spinal anesthesia alone.
Eligibility Criteria
Benign anorectal disease patients underwent surgery interventions. Characteristics of age, gender, height, weight, ASA score, past medical history, operational history were recorded from EHIS systems. Intraoperative findings which include anesthesia time, operation time, intraoperative fluid. Surgical outcomes include surgery complications, anesthesia complications, pain score. All of above data were retrospective recorded from hospital discharge note, OPD records, operation note, pathology report.
You may qualify if:
- \>20 years old patients
- ASA 1-2 patients
- Patients who will undergo anorectal surgery with including hemorrhoidectomy, fistulectomy, fistulotomy, fissurectomy and anoplasty.
You may not qualify if:
- Having known hypersensitivity to amide type local anesthetics
- Patients ASA \>=3
- Surgery methods: hemorrhoidopexy, Laser hemorrhoidoplasty
- Fournier gangrene patients
- Surgery due to previous complications
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Taichung Verterans General Hospital
Taichung, Taiwan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Chun-Yu Lin, M.D.
Taichung Veterans General Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 5, 2022
First Posted
October 7, 2022
Study Start
January 1, 2017
Primary Completion
May 30, 2022
Study Completion
September 30, 2022
Last Updated
January 31, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-01