Radiological vs Clinical Outcome in DRF
Association Between Radiographic and Clinical Outcome in Distal Radius Fractures: A Prospective Cohort Study With a 1-year Follow-up in 368 Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
451
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Background: Several studies have investigated the degree of final displacement and its association with clinical outcome. There is still no consensus on the importance of radiological outcome and published studies do not use the same criteria for an acceptable alignment. Previous reports have used a linear or a dichotomized exposure in the statistical analysis, but no study has investigated a nonlinear association. Methods: We included 438 patients treated for a distal radius fracture (DRF) with either reduction and cast immobilization or surgery. Radiographic outcomes were determined by radiographs 3 months after the injury. Clinical outcome was determined by QuickDASH (qDASH), ROM and grip strength at 1-year after the injury. Nonlinear correlations were analysed with cubic splines.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2009
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 21, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 28, 2022
CompletedSeptember 28, 2022
September 1, 2022
1.9 years
September 21, 2022
September 23, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
quickDASH
The DASH is a 30-item PROM questionnaire that evaluates the upper extremity \[115\]. The qDASH is a shortened version with 11 questions that can be used instead of the full 30-item questionnaire \[114\]. Both are validated for use in upper extremity disorders \[114,115\]. Neither is specific for wrist function and both yield scores from 0 to 100, where lower scores indicate a better outcome.
12 months
Range of motion
The active ROM of the radiocarpal joint and the radioulnar joints were measured in both hands using a standard goniometer. The arcs of flexion-extension, pronation-supination and radial-ulnar deviation were recorded. Total ROM was calculated as the sum of these three arcs. The loss of ROM in the fractured wrist was expressed in angular degrees compared to the contralateral uninjured wrist \[126\]. Independent occupational therapists, blinded to the radiological outcome, measured objective function, including grip strength and active ROM.
12 months
Grip strength
Grip strength was measured in a sitting position with the elbow in 90° of flexion, neutral rotation and wrist 0°-30° extension using a JAMAR dynamometer \[122\]. To prevent it from falling, the examiner may support the JAMAR dynamometer. Both hands are examined, starting with the uninjured hand. Three strength tests were conducted during the assessment of grip strength, with the mean score of the three tests recorded for analysis. Grip strength was adjusted by 10% for the non-dominant hand \[123\]. The contralateral wrist was used as an internal control. Grip strength was expressed as a percentage (the ratio to the uninjured wrist) and the absolute loss in kilograms comparing the fractured wrist to the uninjured wrist. Independent occupational therapists, blinded to the radiological outcome, measured objective function, including grip strength and active ROM.
12 months
Study Arms (1)
Treatment protocol
OTHERAll patients were treated according to the treatment protocol with cast for minimally displaced fractures and surgery for displaced fractures.
Interventions
Surgery of distal radius fracture for displaced fractures
Reduction and cast treatment of distal radius fracture for minimally displaced fractures
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- Patients with distal radius fracture between 15 and 74 years, with closed physes of the distal radius and ulna.
You may not qualify if:
- Dementia
- Previous fracture to the ipsilateral wrist
- Open fracture
- Other concomitant or existing damage or injury to the wrist
- Galeazzi fracture
- Rheumatoid arthritis
- Alcohol or drug abuse
- Neurologic impairment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Schmidt V, Gordon M, Tagil M, Sayed-Noor A, Mukka S, Wadsten M. Association Between Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Following Distal Radial Fractures: A Prospective Cohort Study with 1-Year Follow-up in 366 Patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023 Aug 2;105(15):1156-1167. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.22.01096. Epub 2023 May 12.
PMID: 37172109DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 21, 2022
First Posted
September 28, 2022
Study Start
October 1, 2009
Primary Completion
September 1, 2011
Study Completion
September 1, 2011
Last Updated
September 28, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-09