NCT05555290

Brief Summary

A study evaluating efficacy and safety of repeated doses of PT027 compared to PT007 in patients with asthma and acute airway obstruction induced by repeated mannitol challenges

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
190

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_3 asthma

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2022

Typical duration for phase_3 asthma

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 25, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 26, 2022

Completed
2 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 28, 2022

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 18, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 18, 2024

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 27, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

January 27, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2.1 years

First QC Date

August 25, 2022

Results QC Date

November 12, 2025

Last Update Submit

January 26, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Acute airway obstructionAlbuterolBudesonideShort-acting beta2-agonists (SABA)Albuterol Sulfate

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Part 1: Change From Mannitol Baseline Forced Expiratory Volume in the First Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve (AUC [0-60 Min]) Post-mannitol Challenge 1 - Non-Inferiority Analysis

    The efficacy of repeated dosing of PT027 relative to PT007, on post-dose lung function, when used by participants with asthma on SABA as-needed treatment only who are experiencing acute airway obstruction induced by mannitol challenges was assessed. Mannitol baseline was defined as the FEV1 result where a positive response to mannitol was observed prior to dosing of study drug for challenge 1 in Visit 2 and in Visit 3 (time 0). A positive response was defined as a ≥ 15% decrease from the FEV1 determined after the 0 mg mannitol dose up to ≤ 635 mg cumulative mannitol dose. The primary efficacy comparison of non-inferiority of PT027 versus PT007 evaluated the while-on treatment estimand in the Per Protocol (PP) analysis set and was based on a 1-sided hypothesis testing approach with a non-inferiority margin of -150 mL.

    Up to 60 minutes post mannitol challenge 1

  • Part 1: Change From Mannitol Baseline FEV1 AUC (0-60 Min) Post-mannitol Challenge 1 - Superiority Analysis

    The efficacy of repeated dosing of PT027 relative to PT007, on post-dose lung function, when used by participants with asthma on SABA as-needed treatment only who are experiencing acute airway obstruction induced by mannitol challenges was assessed. Mannitol baseline was defined as the FEV1 result where a positive response to mannitol was observed prior to dosing of study drug for challenge 1 in Visit 2 and in Visit 3 (time 0). A positive response was defined as a ≥ 15% decrease from the FEV1 determined after the 0 mg mannitol dose up to ≤ 635 mg cumulative mannitol dose. If non-inferiority was demonstrated, then comparisons were made to establish the superiority of PT027 versus PT007. The primary efficacy comparison of superiority was based on a 2-sided hypothesis testing approach in the randomized set (RS). Superiority was concluded if the 2-sided p-value was \< 0.05.

    Up to 60 minutes post mannitol challenge 1

  • Part 2: Change From Mannitol Baseline FEV1 AUC (0-60 Min) Post-mannitol Challenge 1 - Non-Inferiority Analysis

    The efficacy of repeated dosing of PT027 relative to PT007, on post-dose lung function, when used by participants with asthma on SABA as-needed treatment only who are experiencing acute airway obstruction induced by mannitol challenges was assessed. Mannitol baseline was defined as the FEV1 result where a positive response to mannitol was observed prior to dosing of study drug for challenge 1 in Visit 2 and in Visit 3 (time 0). A positive response was defined as a ≥ 15% decrease from the FEV1 determined after the 0 mg mannitol dose up to ≤ 635 mg cumulative mannitol dose. The primary efficacy comparison of non-inferiority of PT027 versus PT007 evaluated the while-on-treatment estimand in the PP analysis set and was based on a 1-sided hypothesis testing approach with a non-inferiority margin of -150 mL.

    Up to 60 minutes post mannitol challenge 1

  • Part 2: Change From Mannitol Baseline FEV1 AUC (0-60 Min) Post-mannitol Challenge 1 - Superiority Analysis

    The efficacy of repeated dosing of PT027 relative to PT007, on post-dose lung function, when used by participants with asthma on SABA as-needed treatment only who are experiencing acute airway obstruction induced by mannitol challenges was assessed. Mannitol baseline was defined as the FEV1 result where a positive response to mannitol was observed prior to dosing of study drug for challenge 1 in Visit 2 and in Visit 3 (time 0). A positive response was defined as a ≥ 15% decrease from the FEV1 determined after the 0 mg mannitol dose up to ≤ 635 mg cumulative mannitol dose. If non-inferiority was demonstrated, then comparisons were made to establish the superiority of PT027 versus PT007. The primary efficacy comparison of superiority was based on a 2-sided hypothesis testing approach in the modified randomized set (mRS). Superiority was concluded if the 2-sided p-value was \< 0.05.

    Up to 60 minutes post mannitol challenge 1

Secondary Outcomes (20)

  • Part 1: Change From Mannitol Baseline in FEV1 AUC (0-15 Min) Post-mannitol Challenge 1 - Non-Inferiority Analysis

    Up to 15 minutes post mannitol challenge 1

  • Part 1: Change From Mannitol Baseline in FEV1 AUC (0-15 Min) Post-mannitol Challenge 1 - Superiority Analysis

    Up to 15 minutes post mannitol challenge 1

  • Part 2: Change From Mannitol Baseline in FEV1 AUC (0-15 Min) Post-mannitol Challenge 1 - Non-Inferiority Analysis

    Up to 15 minutes post mannitol challenge 1

  • Part 2: Change From Mannitol Baseline in FEV1 AUC (0-15 Min) Post-mannitol Challenge 1 - Superiority Analysis

    Up to 15 minutes post mannitol challenge 1

  • Part 1: Change From Mannitol Baseline in FEV1 at 7 Hours Post-mannitol Challenge 1 - Non-Inferiority Analysis

    At 7 hours post mannitol challenge 1

  • +15 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Treatment A (PT027) [experimental], then Treatment B (PT007) [active comparator] Part 1 & 2

EXPERIMENTAL

At Visit 2, participants will receive repeated oral inhalations of PT027 to treat acute airway obstruction induced by a repeated airway challenge, followed by a washout period of 10-14 days. At Visit 3, participants will receive repeated oral inhalations of PT007 to treat acute airway obstruction induced by a repeated airway challenge.

Combination Product: PT027Combination Product: PT007

Treatment B (PT007) [active comparator], then Treatment A (PT027) [experimental] Part 1 & 2

EXPERIMENTAL

At Visit 2, participants will receive repeated oral inhalations of PT007 to treat acute airway obstruction induced by a repeated airway challenge, followed by a washout period of 10 to 14 days. At Visit 3, participants will receive repeated oral inhalations of PT027 to treat acute airway obstruction induced by a repeated airway challenge.

Combination Product: PT027Combination Product: PT007

Interventions

PT027COMBINATION_PRODUCT

When administered PT027, participants will receive 2 actuations of albuterol- budesonide per dose administered as oral inhalations.

Treatment A (PT027) [experimental], then Treatment B (PT007) [active comparator] Part 1 & 2Treatment B (PT007) [active comparator], then Treatment A (PT027) [experimental] Part 1 & 2
PT007COMBINATION_PRODUCT

When administered PT007, participants will receive 2 actuations of albuterol administered as oral inhalations.

Treatment A (PT027) [experimental], then Treatment B (PT007) [active comparator] Part 1 & 2Treatment B (PT007) [active comparator], then Treatment A (PT027) [experimental] Part 1 & 2

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 130 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Participants who have been diagnosed with asthma \> 6 months before Visit 1 by a physician.
  • Participants must have been prescribed and using as-needed SABA as only asthma treatment for at least 4 weeks before screening visit.
  • Participants should have pre-bronchodilator FEV1 ≥ 1.5 L and FEV1 ≥ 60% to \< 90% predicted normal at Visit 1.
  • Participants should have a positive response to mannitol challenge performed at Visit 1 (a decrease in FEV1 by at least 15% \[PD15\] at ≤ 635 mg).
  • Participants should return to within 10% of baseline FEV1 (≥ 90% of baseline FEV1), within 1 hour after positive mannitol challenge and 4 inhalations of PT007, performed at Visit 1.
  • Participants should be able to adhere to study procedures in the judgment of the Investigator.
  • Male or female.
  • Women of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test at each study visit.
  • Capable of giving signed informed consent which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the Informed Consent Form (ICF) and in this protocol.
  • Provision of signed and dated written Optional Genetic Research Information informed consent prior to collection of samples for optional genetic research that supports Genomic Initiative.

You may not qualify if:

  • Any evidence of clinically significant lung disease other than asthma.
  • If the participant has had any face-to-face unscheduled or urgent visit for asthma worsening within the last 4 weeks.
  • Any significant disease or disorder, or evidence of drug/substance abuse which in the Investigator's opinion would pose a risk to participant safety, interfere with the conduct of study, have an impact on the study results, or make it undesirable for the participant to participate in the study.
  • If participants have used Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) within 1 month prior to enrolment.
  • If they have used immunosuppressive medication (including but not limited to methotrexate, troleandomycin, cyclosporine, azathioprine, systemic corticosteroids including regular treatment with oral corticosteroids or intramuscular long-acting depot corticosteroids, or any experimental anti-inflammatory therapy) within 3 months prior to enrolment (Visit 1) or plan on starting immunosuppressive medications during the study.
  • If they have used allergen-specific immunotherapy (desensitization) within 3 months prior to enrolment.
  • If they have used systemic corticosteroids (including oral and injected) within 3 months prior to enrolment.
  • If they have received any marketed or investigational biologic within 4 months or 5 half-lives prior to enrolment (whichever is longer) or received any investigational nonbiologic agent within 30 days or 5 half-lives prior to enrolment (whichever is longer).
  • Participants with a known hypersensitivity to beta2-agonists, ICS, mannitol, or any of the excipients of the product.
  • Any clinically significant abnormal findings in physical examination, vital signs, ECG (eg, participants with QTcF \> 500 ms), hematology, clinical chemistry, or urinalysis, which in the opinion of the Investigator, may put the participant at risk because of his/her participation in the study, or may influence the results of the study, or the participant's ability to complete entire duration of the study.
  • If they are current smokers or participants with smoking history ≥ 10 pack years including the use of vaping products, such as electronic cigarettes, and water pipes. If they are former smokers with a smoking history of \<10 pack years, including former vaping or water pipe users, smoking must have stopped for at least 6 months prior to Visit 1 to be eligible.
  • Involvement in the planning and/or conduct of the study (applies to both AstraZeneca staff and its affiliates and/or staff at the study site and their immediate relative(s)).
  • Judgment by the Investigator that the participant should not participate in the study if the participant is unlikely to comply with study procedures, restrictions, and requirements.
  • Breast feeding, pregnancy or intention to become pregnant during the course of the study.
  • Previous randomization in the present study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Research Site

Columbia, Maryland, 21046, United States

Location

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Asthma

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Bronchial DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesLung Diseases, ObstructiveLung DiseasesRespiratory HypersensitivityHypersensitivity, ImmediateHypersensitivityImmune System Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Global Clinical Lead
Organization
AstraZeneca

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: The study will enroll 17 participants in Part 1 and 88 participants in Part 2
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 25, 2022

First Posted

September 26, 2022

Study Start

September 28, 2022

Primary Completion

November 18, 2024

Study Completion

November 18, 2024

Last Updated

January 27, 2026

Results First Posted

January 27, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Qualified researchers can request access to anonymized individual patient-level data from AstraZeneca group of companies sponsored clinical trials via the request portal. All requests will be evaluated as per the AZ disclosure commitment: https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure. Yes, indicates that AZ are accepting requests for IPD, but this does not mean all requests will be shared.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
Time Frame
AstraZeneca will meet or exceed data availability as per the commitments made to the EFPIA Pharma Data Sharing Principles. For details of our timelines, please refer to our disclosure commitment at https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure.
Access Criteria
When a request has been approved AstraZeneca will provide access to the deidentified individual patient-level data in an approved sponsored tool. Signed Data Sharing Agreement (non-negotiable contract for data accessors) must be in place before accessing requested information. Additionally, all users will need to accept the terms and conditions of the SAS MSE to gain access. For additional details, please review the Disclosure Statements at https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure.
More information

Locations