2 Year Follow-up of Indirect Resin Composite Restorations Luted With Different Adhesive Resin Cement: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Study Start
February 10, 2017
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
May 10, 2019
Actual (reported)Study Completion
April 10, 2022
Actual (reported)Objective: To evaluate the clinical performance of indirect resin composite restorations, which were luted with two different resin cement, in posterior teeth for up to 2 years. Methods: From February 2017 to May 2017, a total of 43 patients (21 men, 22 women; mean age.), received 48 onlay restorations made of laboratory-processed indirect composite (Gradia, GC, Japan). 27 onlay restorations (Group A) were luted using an etch and rinse resin cement (Variolink II, Ivoclar Vivadent) and 22 onlay restorations (Group B) were luted using a self-adhesive resin cement (Relyx U200, 3M ESPE). Patients were followed until May 2019. Two independent calibrated examiners evaluated the restorations at 3-time points: 2 weeks after placement (baseline), 6 months, and then annually, using the modified USPHS/FDI criteria.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
April 10, 2022
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
February 10, 2017
Actual (reported)May 10, 2019
Actual (reported)April 10, 2022
Actual (reported)August 19, 2022
Actual (reported)September 22, 2022
Actual (reported)Endocrowns FDI evaluation
this clinical trial aimed to evaluate posterior teeth restored with indirect resin composites and compare clinical performances of two resin cement (one etch and rinse and one self-adhesive) 2 weeks and 6, 12, 24 months, and 5 years after the luting of indirect resin composite restorations using the modified USPHS/FDI criteria.
2 year
Aesthetic :Functional :Biological :Vitality-resin cement
2 weeks and 6, 12 months and 2 year
In Group A, the onlays and overlays were luted adhesively with etch and rinse, dual cure resin cement (Variolink II, Ivoclar Vivadent).
In Group B the onlays and overlays were luted using a self-adhesive resin cement (Relyx U200, 3M ESPE).
resin cement (Variolink II, Ivoclar Vivadent)-self-adhesive resin cement (Relyx U200, 3M ESPE)
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Yelda Erdem Hepsenoglu
Istanbul, 34290, Turkey (Türkiye)
yelda erdem hepsenoglu
Medipol University
40 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
August 19, 2022
First Posted
September 22, 2022
Study Start
February 10, 2017
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
May 10, 2019
Actual (reported)Study Completion
April 10, 2022
Actual (reported)Last Updated
October 5, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-10
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: