Follow-up of Indirect Restorations Luted With Different Adhesive Resin Cement
2 Year Follow-up of Indirect Resin Composite Restorations Luted With Different Adhesive Resin Cement: A Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Objective: To evaluate the clinical performance of indirect resin composite restorations, which were luted with two different resin cement, in posterior teeth for up to 2 years. Methods: From February 2017 to May 2017, a total of 43 patients (21 men, 22 women; mean age.), received 48 onlay restorations made of laboratory-processed indirect composite (Gradia, GC, Japan). 27 onlay restorations (Group A) were luted using an etch and rinse resin cement (Variolink II, Ivoclar Vivadent) and 22 onlay restorations (Group B) were luted using a self-adhesive resin cement (Relyx U200, 3M ESPE). Patients were followed until May 2019. Two independent calibrated examiners evaluated the restorations at 3-time points: 2 weeks after placement (baseline), 6 months, and then annually, using the modified USPHS/FDI criteria.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 10, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 10, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 10, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 19, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 22, 2022
CompletedOctober 5, 2023
October 1, 2023
2.2 years
August 19, 2022
October 3, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Endocrowns FDI evaluation
this clinical trial aimed to evaluate posterior teeth restored with indirect resin composites and compare clinical performances of two resin cement (one etch and rinse and one self-adhesive) 2 weeks and 6, 12, 24 months, and 5 years after the luting of indirect resin composite restorations using the modified USPHS/FDI criteria.
2 year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Aesthetic :Functional :Biological :Vitality-resin cement
2 weeks and 6, 12 months and 2 year
Study Arms (2)
In Group A,(Variolink II, Ivoclar Vivadent).
EXPERIMENTALIn Group A, the onlays and overlays were luted adhesively with etch and rinse, dual cure resin cement (Variolink II, Ivoclar Vivadent).
In Group B, (Relyx U200, 3M ESPE).
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn Group B the onlays and overlays were luted using a self-adhesive resin cement (Relyx U200, 3M ESPE).
Interventions
resin cement (Variolink II, Ivoclar Vivadent)-self-adhesive resin cement (Relyx U200, 3M ESPE)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults of at least 18 years of age, with good oral hygiene, having an antagonist tooth in occlusion, being mentally in a good state to provide written consent to participate in the clinical study, and willing to attend the scheduled follow-up appointments.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Yelda Erdem Hepsenoglu
Istanbul, 34290, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
yelda erdem hepsenoglu
Medipol University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 19, 2022
First Posted
September 22, 2022
Study Start
February 10, 2017
Primary Completion
May 10, 2019
Study Completion
April 10, 2022
Last Updated
October 5, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-10