CBT and the Neural Circuits of Anxiety
The Impact of CBT on Shock-Potentiated Neural Circuity
2 other identifiers
observational
174
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will aim to test whether specific neural circuitry changes, proposed on the basis of a neurocognitive model of anxiety, are a mechanism of action for Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) interventions. This study aims to provide a theoretical model of the neurobiological mechanisms of CBT's therapeutic effect, where there currently is none, and potentially allow for more targeted/specific approaches to anxiety disorders following the identification of key CBT mechanisms. The ultimate aim is to improve the efficacy of CBT, and more generally, psychological interventions for anxiety disorders.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Feb 2020
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 2, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 7, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 22, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2025
CompletedJune 29, 2025
June 1, 2025
5.8 years
September 7, 2022
June 25, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
'Aversive amplification circuit' connectivity
The engagement of the neural circuit of the amygdala, cingulate cortex and prefrontal cortex will be measured via an fMRI analysis technique called a psychophysiological interactions (PPI) analysis. PPI analysis concerns behaviour-specific increases in the relationship across regional brain activity - this means that it can allow one to assess whether two regions (a priori selected ROIs) show increased connectivity during a specific context or behaviour, suggesting a behaviour-specific increase in transfer of information. The output of this analysis will take form of a continuous beta weight - an index of connectivity across two brain regions (amygdala and medial prefrontal cortex), which represents the primary outcome of the study.
Day 0, up to 12 weeks (post-CBT or matched time on waiting list)
Secondary Outcomes (16)
Cognitive task performance: Loss/risk aversion task
Day 0, up to 12 weeks (post-CBT or matched time on waiting list)
Cognitive task performance: Go/no-go task
Day 0, up to 12 weeks (post-CBT or matched time on waiting list)
Cognitive task performance: Facial emotional processing task
Day 0, up to 12 weeks (post-CBT or matched time on waiting list)
Cognitive task performance: Emotional face recognition task
Day 0, up to 12 weeks (post-CBT or matched time on waiting list)
Cognitive task performance: Visual affective bias task
Day 0, up to 12 weeks (post-CBT or matched time on waiting list)
- +11 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Mood diary
Day 0, up to 12 weeks (post-CBT or matched time on waiting list)
Study Arms (2)
Treatment Group
Participants undergoing a course of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT)
Waiting List Group
Participants on the Waiting List for CBT
Interventions
In the Cognitive Behavioural Therapy group (N=87), patients will undergo CBT as part of their routine care in Step 3 of the IAPT programme. This will be administered by suitably trained clinicians. The specification of CBT is as recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines (CG113 - Generalised anxiety disorder and panic disorder in adults: management). In these guidelines, patients are offered on average, 12-15 hourly, weekly sessions of CBT with a trained and competent practitioners. Therapy sessions involve discussions that identify patterns in thinking or behaviours which may be problematic, and therapists and patients work to set goals to reduce these using cognitive techniques. The principle is to teach the patient how to use CBT techniques in their day-to-day life to promote a lasting effect on mental health. We will test patients before (T1) and after (T2) a course of treatment.
In the control group (N=87), we will test patients who are currently seeking (but not undergoing) treatment before (T1) and after a wait (T2) of equivalent time (i.e. waiting list controls)
Eligibility Criteria
Individuals entering IAPT services (IAPT step 3; i.e., full CBT) for anxiety disorders
You may qualify if:
- Enrolled in IAPT Step 3 (high intensity service)
- Score of or above 8 on the GAD-7 (indicating moderate anxiety on a standard scale of anxiety; Spitzer et al., 2006)
- Willing and able to provide written consent
You may not qualify if:
- Score above 22 on the GAD-7
- Past/present psychotic disorder, bipolar disorder/mania or alcohol/substance use disorder (outside a comorbid psychiatric episode)
- History of medical illness that may impair cognitive function (e.g. serious head injury, endocrine disorder)
- Current psychotropic pharmacological intervention (e.g. SSRIs) or use within 3 months
- MRI contraindications such as pacemaker, aneurysm clip, cochlear implant, neurostimulator, IUD, shrapnel, metal fragments in eye, weight of above 250lbs or claustrophobia
- Females who are pregnant, planning pregnancy, or breastfeeding
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- UCLH/UCL Joint Research Officelead
- Medical Research Councilcollaborator
- Camden and Islington NHS Trustcollaborator
- Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trustcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London
London, WC1N 3AZ, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- OTHER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 7, 2022
First Posted
September 22, 2022
Study Start
February 2, 2020
Primary Completion
December 1, 2025
Study Completion
December 1, 2025
Last Updated
June 29, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06