NCT05548894

Brief Summary

Stabilization splint therapy and Low-level laser therapy may serve as non-invasive intervention for painful temporomandibular disorders, but its efficacy is still debated. This study compared the effect of stabilization splint and low-level laser therapy alone or in combination in patients with painful chronic closed lock of temporomandibular joints disc displacement without Reduction 42 patients diagnosed with chronic closed lock of disc displacement without reduction were allocated equally and randomly into three treatment groups: group I received combined stabilization splint and low- level laser therapy, group II received low - level laser therapy and group III received stabilization splint. They were evaluated at baseline and one week, two weeks, four weeks, three months, and six months after the intervention.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
42

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 3, 2021

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 6, 2022

Completed
28 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 6, 2022

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 11, 2022

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 22, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

September 27, 2022

Status Verified

August 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

September 11, 2022

Last Update Submit

September 23, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • evaluation of mouth opening

    improvement in mouth opening or not

    6 months

  • Masticatory muscles palpation

    the masticatory muscles were palpated bilaterally with firm and constant pressure of one kg lasted two seconds to define painful areas

    6 months

  • temporomandibular joint palpation

    joint pain was achieved by first palpating the temporomandibular joint lateral pole by placing the index finger with firm and constant pressure of half kg lasted two seconds over the condyle in front of the tragus

    6 months

Study Arms (3)

stabilization splint

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

acrylic splint in the maxillary arch with flat surface

Device: stabilization splint

laser therapy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

laser beam directed to the affected part cause activation of blood circulation

Device: laser therapy

stabilization splint and laser therapy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

using both laser therapy and stabilization splint for more improvement

Device: stabilization splint and laser therapy

Interventions

upper acrylic splint rest on the maxillary teeth and had flat surface

Also known as: upper acrylic full arch splint
stabilization splint

The laser apparatus had a hand piece on which either a specially designed optic prism was attached to transfer laser energy to the tip of the prism

Also known as: Low-level laser therapy
laser therapy

the stabilization splint used in combination of treatment with laser therapy

Also known as: splint combined with low level laser therapy
stabilization splint and laser therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 55 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Clinical diagnosis of chronic closed lock patients
  • Must not be able to open their mouth

You may not qualify if:

  • neurologic diseases
  • TMJ pathologic lesions

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Mansoura university

Al Mansurah, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Ooi K, Yura S, Inoue N, Totsuka Y. Factors related to the incidence of anterior disc displacement without reduction and bony changes of the temporomandibular joint in patients with anterior open bite. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Dec;18(4):397-401. doi: 10.1007/s10006-013-0424-3. Epub 2013 Jul 9.

    PMID: 23835639BACKGROUND
  • Samdal F, Amland PF, Sandsmark M, Hall C, Aasen AO. Suction-assisted lipectomy does not increase the risk of random flap necrosis in a randomized study in pigs. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1995 Nov-Dec;19(6):549-53. doi: 10.1007/BF00454320.

    PMID: 8638492BACKGROUND
  • El-Shaheed NH, Mostafa AZH, Aboelez MA. Efficacy of stabilisation splint and low-level laser therapy for patients with chronic closed lock from non-reducible displaced temporo-mandibular joint discs: A parallel randomised clinical trial. J Oral Rehabil. 2023 Mar;50(3):177-193. doi: 10.1111/joor.13405. Epub 2023 Jan 5.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Laser TherapyLow-Level Light Therapy

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

TherapeuticsAblation TechniquesSurgical Procedures, OperativePhototherapy

Study Officials

  • Noha Elshahid

    lecturer at mansoura university prosthodontic department

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Parallel clinical trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 11, 2022

First Posted

September 22, 2022

Study Start

March 3, 2021

Primary Completion

February 6, 2022

Study Completion

March 6, 2022

Last Updated

September 27, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations