Study Stopped
Sponsor has opted to discontinue the study due to site non-compliance.
Clinical Study to Evaluate the Performance of Synthetic Polyurethane Male Condoms
A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Crossover and Multi-center Clinical Study to Evaluate the Performance of Synthetic Polyurethane Male Condom Compared to Standard Latex Condom During Vaginal Intercourse
1 other identifier
interventional
188
1 country
4
Brief Summary
This study is a randomized, double-blinded, crossover and multi-center study to evaluate the clinical breakage and slippage of a new synthetic polyurethane male condom compared to a commercially available standard latex condom.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 8, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 10, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 12, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 27, 2024
CompletedMarch 20, 2025
March 1, 2025
10 months
January 31, 2022
March 17, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The total clinical failure rates for the test and control condoms
The total clinical failure rate of a new test condom is comparable with the failure rate of a commercially available latex condom when used during vaginal intercourse as reported by study participant questionnaire.
6 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Clinical / Non-clinical slippage rates acceptability; and Adverse events
6 weeks
Clinical/non-clinical breakage rates
6 weeks
User acceptance
6 weeks
Adverse events
6 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Okamoto Lubricated Synthetic Polyurethane Male Condom
EXPERIMENTALThe test device name is Okamoto 001 Lubricated Polyurethane Male Condom. The condom is made in Japan and conforms to ASTM D6324-11 (2017) Standard Test Methods for Male Condoms Made from Polyurethane.
Latex condom
ACTIVE COMPARATORCommercially available latex lubricated condom.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects are required to meet ALL of the following criteria for randomization into the study:
- mutually monogamous, current relationship ≥ 3 months;
- years to 65 years of age;
- sexually active, sufficient to meet protocol requirements; agree to have penile-vaginal intercourse with frequency sufficient to meet protocol requirements;
- agree to use only study condoms during time of participation;
- agree not to use drugs, ointments or non-study devices that can affect sexual performance or might affect the condom's physical property;
- able to understand instructions for correct use of condoms;
- no known sexually transmitted infections including HIV/AIDS;
- agree to use only lubricant(s) provided by the study;
- agree to return any unopened condoms and lubricants;
- agree not to wear any genital piercing jewelry while using study condoms;
- l) willing to use the study products for minimum of 10 acts of vaginal intercourse within 6 weeks of study entry; l) willing and capable of following requirements of protocol, including willingness to respond to questions about reproductive and contraceptive history and use of condoms during interviews; m) agree to use and has internet/web access in order to complete the Diaries and Surveys using iMedNet's ePRO module; n) available for follow-up and reachable by telephone.
You may not qualify if:
- he/she is allergic or sensitive to natural rubber latex or polyurethane,
- female partner is pregnant or desires to become so while participating in study,
- subject knowingly has a sexually transmitted infection,
- commercial sex workers,
- itinerant persons who cannot be able to complete the study, e.g. migrant farm workers,
- male partner has known erectile or ejaculatory dysfunction,
- either partner is using any medications or preparation applied topically or intravaginally to the genitalia other than that supplied for the study,
- either partner is an employee of study sponsor, competitor or affiliated with clinical research center,
- currently participating in another sexual health clinical study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Okamoto Industries, Inc.lead
- NAMSAcollaborator
Study Sites (4)
Physicians Research Group
Mesa, Arizona, 85209, United States
Angels Clinical Research Center
Miami, Florida, 33176, United States
Physicians Research Group
West Lafayette, Indiana, 47906, United States
Wellnow
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45212, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 31, 2022
First Posted
September 10, 2022
Study Start
September 8, 2022
Primary Completion
July 12, 2023
Study Completion
June 27, 2024
Last Updated
March 20, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share