Study Stopped
The study PI moved to another institution and this study is not moving with the PI to the new institution.
Accuracy of Ultrasound for Detecting Residual Fragments During RIRS
Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound Versus Fluoroscopy for Detecting Residual Fragments During Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the accuracy of ultrasound and traditional fluoroscopy to find the residual fragments before retrograde intrarenal surgery is complete. This would ultimately limit the need for radiation exposure and improve the quality of clinical care given to patients and healthcare teams.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 6, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 10, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 27, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 18, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 18, 2024
CompletedJanuary 17, 2025
January 1, 2025
1.7 years
September 6, 2022
January 15, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Diagnostic accuracy detecting residual fragments during retrograde intrarenal surgery
The diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound and fluoroscopy will be measured in conjunction with endoscopic examination for detecting residual fragments during retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones treatment by the same endourologist to determine the size of the largest residual fragment, categorizing them as stone free, ≤ 2 mm, or \>2 mm, and compared with routine low-dose non-contrast computed tomography by a radiologist blinded to surgery and intraoperative imaging, categorizing them as stone free, ≤ 2 mm, or \>2 mm. The results will be compared for accuracy.
4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Sensitivity detecting residual fragments during retrograde intrarenal surgery
4 weeks
Specificity detecting residual fragments during retrograde intrarenal surgery
4 weeks
Positive predictive value detecting residual fragments during retrograde intrarenal surgery
4 weeks
Negative predictive value detecting residual fragments during retrograde intrarenal surgery
4 weeks
Operative time in minutes
Surgical duration, up to 4 hours
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Ultrasound
EXPERIMENTALBefore completing retrograde intrarenal surgery, a complete endoscopic examination will be performed along with ultrasound by the same endourologist to determine the size of the largest residual fragment.
Fluoroscopy
NO INTERVENTIONStandard of care, control Before completing retrograde intrarenal surgery, a complete endoscopic examination will be performed along with fluoroscopy by the same endourologist to determine the size of the largest residual fragment.
Interventions
Before completing retrograde intrarenal surgery, a complete endoscopic examination will be performed along with ultrasound instead of fluoroscopy by the same endourologist to determine the size of the largest residual fragment.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients over the age of 18.
- Consecutive patients with a diagnosis of renal stone or ureteral stone with a plan to undergoing RIRS for stone removal.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who decline informed consent.
- Pregnancy
- Kidney transplantation
- Ectopic kidney
- Patients undergoing concurrent bilateral stone removal surgery.
- Patients whose pain cannot be controlled when presenting at the Emergency Department.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94143, United States
Related Publications (12)
Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, Monga M, Murad MH, Nelson CP, Pace KT, Pais VM Jr, Pearle MS, Preminger GM, Razvi H, Shah O, Matlaga BR. Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART II. J Urol. 2016 Oct;196(4):1161-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.091. Epub 2016 May 27.
PMID: 27238615BACKGROUNDTurk C, Petrik A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, Knoll T. EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):475-82. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.041. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
PMID: 26344917BACKGROUNDPrezioso D, Barone B, Di Domenico D, Vitale R. Stone residual fragments: A thorny problem. Urologia. 2019 Nov;86(4):169-176. doi: 10.1177/0391560319860654. Epub 2019 Jul 14.
PMID: 31304880BACKGROUNDDanilovic A, Cavalanti A, Rocha BA, Traxer O, Torricelli FCM, Marchini GS, Mazzucchi E, Srougi M. Assessment of Residual Stone Fragments After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery. J Endourol. 2018 Dec;32(12):1108-1113. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0529.
PMID: 30398369BACKGROUNDBrisbane W, Bailey MR, Sorensen MD. An overview of kidney stone imaging techniques. Nat Rev Urol. 2016 Nov;13(11):654-662. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.154. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
PMID: 27578040BACKGROUNDTzou DT, Usawachintachit M, Taguchi K, Chi T. Ultrasound Use in Urinary Stones: Adapting Old Technology for a Modern-Day Disease. J Endourol. 2017 Apr;31(S1):S89-S94. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0584. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
PMID: 27733052BACKGROUNDDeters LA, Belanger G, Shah O, Pais VM. Ultrasound guided ureteroscopy in pregnancy. Clin Nephrol. 2013 Feb;79(2):118-23. doi: 10.5414/CN107654.
PMID: 23073063BACKGROUNDMorrison JC, Van Batavia JP, Darge K, Long CJ, Shukla AR, Srinivasan AK. Ultrasound guided ureteroscopy in children: Safety and success. J Pediatr Urol. 2018 Feb;14(1):64.e1-64.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.08.019. Epub 2017 Oct 14.
PMID: 29239803BACKGROUNDRay AA, Ghiculete D, Pace KT, Honey RJ. Limitations to ultrasound in the detection and measurement of urinary tract calculi. Urology. 2010 Aug;76(2):295-300. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.12.015. Epub 2010 Mar 5.
PMID: 20206970BACKGROUNDKanno T, Kubota M, Funada S, Okada T, Higashi Y, Yamada H. The Utility of the Kidneys-ureters-bladder Radiograph as the Sole Imaging Modality and Its Combination With Ultrasonography for the Detection of Renal Stones. Urology. 2017 Jun;104:40-44. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.03.019. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
PMID: 28341578BACKGROUNDRoberson NP, Dillman JR, O'Hara SM, DeFoor WR Jr, Reddy PP, Giordano RM, Trout AT. Comparison of ultrasound versus computed tomography for the detection of kidney stones in the pediatric population: a clinical effectiveness study. Pediatr Radiol. 2018 Jul;48(7):962-972. doi: 10.1007/s00247-018-4099-7. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
PMID: 29476214BACKGROUNDDindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.
PMID: 15273542BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Thomas Chi, M.D.
University of California, San Francisco
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 6, 2022
First Posted
September 10, 2022
Study Start
March 27, 2023
Primary Completion
December 18, 2024
Study Completion
December 18, 2024
Last Updated
January 17, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share