ANKLE TRAUMA Diagnostic Value of Ultrasound Compared to Standard Radiography in the Detection of Fractures
1 other identifier
observational
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To investigate the diagnostic value of ultrasound performed by a lay experimenter compared to standard radiographic imaging (or standard x-ray) in the detection of fractures in patients with closed acute ankle trauma and positive Ottawa ankle rules
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Feb 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 30, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 6, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2022
CompletedSeptember 8, 2022
August 1, 2022
1.7 years
August 30, 2022
September 5, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Negative predictive value
Negative predictive value of ultrasound compared to standard radiography in the detection of long bone fractures
at inclusion
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Sensitivity
at inclusion
Specificity
at inclusion
Eligibility Criteria
Any adult patient presenting to the emergency services of the CHU Saint Pierre
You may qualify if:
- Any adult patient with acute ankle trauma
- \+ one or more criteria of the Ottawa ankle rules :
- Inability to walk 4 steps immediately after the trauma or in the emergency room,
- pain at the level of the internal or external malleolus (the distal 6 cm) or the base of the 5th metatarsal bone.
You may not qualify if:
- Any patient under the age of 18 years
- Any patient unable to sign the informed consent
- Skin lesions contraindicating sonography (e.g. open fracture wound, … )
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
FREZALS Laeticia Vaiana
Brussels, 1000, Belgium
Related Publications (2)
Bozkurt O, Ersel M, Karbek Akarca F, Yalcinli S, Midik S, Kucuk L. The diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography in determining the reduction success of distal radius fractures. Turk J Emerg Med. 2018 Aug 10;18(3):111-118. doi: 10.1016/j.tjem.2018.04.001. eCollection 2018 Sep.
PMID: 30191190RESULTFrezals LV, Delafontaine A, Scoubeau H, Sontou R, Moorthamers S, Plumacker A, Plumacker A. Diagnostic value of FAST ankle ultrasound compared to standard radiography for fracture detection in the emergency department by non-radiologist physicians: a monocentric prospective diagnostic cohort study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Feb 14;51(1):107. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02772-3.
PMID: 39953135DERIVED
Related Links
- Ferràs-Tarragó, J., Antequera-Cano, J.M., Català-de-las-Marinas, J. et al. Ankle torque-related fractures and its echo-fast diagnosis protocol. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 46, 801-805 (2020)
- Doherty, C., Delahunt, E., Caulfield, B. et al. The Incidence and Prevalence of Ankle Sprain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Epidemiological Studies. Sports Med 44, 123-140 (2014)
- Champagne N, Eadie L, Regan L, Wilson P. The effectiveness of ultrasound in the detection of fractures in adults with suspected upper or lower limb injury: a systematic review and subgroup meta-analysis. BMC Emergency Medicine 2019;19
- Nelson BP, Chason K. Use of ultrasound by emergency medical services: a review. International Journal of Emergency Medicine 2008 12;1(4):253-259
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Laeticia Vaiana FL Frezals, Médecin
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint Pierre
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 30, 2022
First Posted
September 6, 2022
Study Start
February 1, 2021
Primary Completion
September 30, 2022
Study Completion
September 30, 2022
Last Updated
September 8, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-08