NCT05525104

Brief Summary

In this randomised, blinded study, we will investigate the influence of DSA on recovery from general anaesthesia. DSA monitoring provides continuous information on depth of hypnosis. Based on DSA monitoring dose adjustments of sevoflurane can be made. We expect that this will lead to a faster speed of emergence and recovery.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
112

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 30, 2022

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 1, 2022

Completed
4 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 5, 2022

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 29, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 29, 2024

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 11, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

March 11, 2025

Status Verified

March 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

August 30, 2022

Results QC Date

January 21, 2025

Last Update Submit

March 5, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Density spectral arrayDepth of hypnosisPaediatric anaesthesia

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The Influence of DSA Monitoring on the Speed of Emergence.

    The speed of emergence is defined as the time interval between the end of hypnotic drug application and the moment when discharge criteria from the operating room are met (defined as a Steward score ≥ 3) The Steward recovery score consists of three domains: consciousness, airway and motor. Consciousness can be scored from 0-2, in which 0 equals non responsive, 1 equals response to stimuli, 2 equals awake. Airway is scored from 0-2: airway that requires maintenance scores 0, maintaining good airway scores 1 and coughing on command or crying scores 2. Motor is also scored form 0-2: no movement scores 0, non-purposeful movement scores 1 and purposeful movement scores 2. Combining all three domains, the minimum score is 0 (unconscious) and the maximum score is 6 (completely awake) The speed of emergence is defined as a minimum score of 3, with a minimum score of 1 in each domain.

    Day 0

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Total Time From Discontinuation of Anaesthetic Drug Delivery Until Discharge From the Post Anaesthesia Care Unit.

    Day 0

  • The Incidence of Postoperative Delirium

    Day 0

  • Differences of Depth of Hypnosis During the Procedure, as Measured by the Narcotrend Monitor.

    Day 0

  • Incidence of Recall of Events During the Procedure (Awareness)

    Day 0, Day 1, Day 14

  • The End-tidal Sevoflurane Concentration

    Day 0

Study Arms (2)

Control

NO INTERVENTION

In patients randomised to the control group, sevoflurane will be titrated according to a Minimal Alveolar Concentration (MAC) of 0.9 respectively an end tidal sevoflurane concentration of 2.3% based on standard practice in our paediatric anaesthesia department.

Treatment

EXPERIMENTAL

In patients randomised to the intervention group of the trial, the anaesthetic agent sevoflurane will be titrated according to the typical DSA pattern for general anaesthesia with sevoflurane, provided by the Narcotrend

Device: Narcotrend Monitor (MT MonitorTechnik, Hannover, Germany)

Interventions

This trial is designed to investigate the additional value of Density Spectral Array monitoring, on the "speed of emergence" after general anaesthesia. We will compare traditional general anaesthesia with sevoflurane using a MAC value and subjective clinical parameters to the objective and continuous approach using DSA depth of hypnosis. The investigational product is the validated Narcotrend monitor, an electroencephalographic monitor, that is regularly used in anaesthesia practice in the Sophia children's hospital and will be used according to intended purpose. The extended version as used in the operating room in the Sophia Children's hospital offers a diversity of diagrams including Density Spectral Array. The electroencephalographic Narcotrend monitor records frontal EEG-activity. Standard paediatric ECG electrodes are used for EEG registration

Treatment

Eligibility Criteria

Age6 Months - 12 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Written informed consent of parents/guardians
  • Age ≥6 months and ≤12 years
  • Surgical procedure requiring GA supplemented with caudal analgesia
  • Ability of the parents/guardians to communicate in Dutch

You may not qualify if:

  • Withdrawal of informed consent
  • (Chronic) use of drugs influencing the electroencephalogram
  • Use of premedication
  • Known intolerance for sevoflurane
  • Parents/guardians unable to communicate in Dutch
  • Protocol violation
  • Data registration failure

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Erasmus Medical Center

Rotterdam, South Holland, 3015GD, Netherlands

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • de Heer IJ, Raab HAC, de Vries J, Karaoz-Bulut G, Weber F. The Influence of Electroencephalographic Density Spectral Array Guidance of Sevoflurane Administration on Recovery From General Anesthesia in Children. A Randomized Controlled Trial. Paediatr Anaesth. 2025 Apr;35(4):287-293. doi: 10.1111/pan.15065. Epub 2025 Jan 13.

Limitations and Caveats

The relatively large number of secondary exclusions due to protocol violations in the standard care group is a shortcoming of this study. The target number of 51 participants per study group was not achieved. Because this exclusion due to protocol violation is completely patient independent, confounding due to exclusion for an outcome-related reason is not an issue. So, to identify a treatment effect that would occur under optimal conditions, we choose to perform a per-protocol analysis.

Results Point of Contact

Title
I.J. de Heer, MD
Organization
Erasmus Medical center

Study Officials

  • Frank Weber, MD, PhD

    Erasmus Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The patient and parents will be blinded to the treatment. The outcome assessor will be blinded as well.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Randomised controlled trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
BSc

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 30, 2022

First Posted

September 1, 2022

Study Start

September 5, 2022

Primary Completion

February 29, 2024

Study Completion

February 29, 2024

Last Updated

March 11, 2025

Results First Posted

March 11, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Data of a patient will only be shared with other fellow researchers (e.g. in case of follow-up studies) upon reasonable request, on the condition that the child's parent explicitly consented.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR
Time Frame
Data will become available after data collection has been completed.
Access Criteria
Reasonable request of fellow researches and only data of patients after explicit consent from parents on the ICF.

Locations