NCT05523349

Brief Summary

This investigation aims to compare the functional performance of a new passive microprocessor-controlled Prosthetic Knee to subjects usual microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
14

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2022

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
2 countries

4 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 15, 2022

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 29, 2022

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 31, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 30, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 30, 2022

Completed
3.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 2, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

February 2, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

August 29, 2022

Results QC Date

October 21, 2025

Last Update Submit

January 30, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Satisfaction During Stair Descent

    A question from the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) regarding the satisfaction of walking downstairs is answered; scale allows for values from 1 to 10 while 1 represents very low satisfaction and 10 high satisfaction. The analysis was done by using a Bayesian approach which presents the posterior distribution of effects between Visit 2 and visit 3. The parameter for analysis is the difference of the score between Visits 2 and 3. If scores in Visit 2 (subjects using the investigational device) were larger than in visit 3 (subjects using their prescribed device), the difference of Visit3 - Visit2 scores would be negative and would therefore support the corresponding hypotheses. The Median difference and range of the Confidence interval of the difference are reported in the outcome measure data table.

    for analysis data from visit 2 (3 weeks after visit 1) and visit 3 (3 weeks after visit 2) were used

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Six Minute Walk Test

    for the final analysis data from visit 2 (3 weeks after visit 1) and visit 3 (3 weeks after visit 2) were used

Study Arms (1)

NAVii

EXPERIMENTAL

Users will be fitted with a new microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee for 3 weeks to compare to their usual device.

Device: NAVii

Interventions

NAViiDEVICE

Passive Microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee

NAVii

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Kg\< body weight \< 136Kg
  • Cognitive ability to understand all instructions and questionnaires in the study;
  • Unilateral TF/KD amputees that are regular prosthesis users for at least 3 months
  • Current MPK users (passive MPKs only)
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Willing and able to participate in the study and follow the protocol
  • Moderate to high active users (PLUS M T-score\>4021)

You may not qualify if:

  • Users with stump pain
  • Users with socket problems
  • Pregnant Users
  • Users using Power Knee, Kenevo or mechanical knees as their prescribed prosthesis
  • Alignment that cannot be matched with the Rheo Knee 4 setup, as described in Instructions for use.
  • Osseointegration

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (4)

Bionic P & O

Merrillville, Indiana, 46410, United States

Location

Oakland Orthopedic appliances

Bay City, Michigan, 48708, United States

Location

Perry Prosthetics

Perrysburg, Ohio, 43551, United States

Location

Ossur Motionlab

Reykjavik, 110, Iceland

Location

Limitations and Caveats

Prosthetic use time was not monitored or controlled for during the adaptation time period, the actual time each subject used the investigational device is therefore unknown. The sample of the trial represents only a small portion of the whole population with above knee amputation.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Lisa Tronicke
Organization
Össur ehf.

Study Officials

  • Kurt N Gruben, CPO

    Ossur Americas

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: Considering previous experience with clinical investigations in prosthetics it was concluded to conduct a non-randomized prospective repeated measures (ABA) design, comparing subjects' current MPK at baseline and 3-week follow-up vs. the investigational device at 3-week follow-up.
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 29, 2022

First Posted

August 31, 2022

Study Start

August 15, 2022

Primary Completion

September 30, 2022

Study Completion

September 30, 2022

Last Updated

February 2, 2026

Results First Posted

February 2, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations