NCT05520710

Brief Summary

The investigators are comparing two methods for helping improve everyday cognitive functioning in Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) veterans who have sustained a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). The two methods are 1) providing educational materials (Education Group) and 2) individual cognitive rehabilitation delivered by a trained Occupational Therapist or Speech-Language Pathologist (Therapy Group). The study is a pilot randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT), and will serve as pilot data for a future RCT.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
55

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2023

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 19, 2022

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 30, 2022

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2023

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

January 23, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

August 19, 2022

Last Update Submit

January 21, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Cognitive RehabilitationCognitive Functioning

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Recruitment Rate

    The primary outcome is the rate of recruitment, average 5 per month. The primary outcome is the rate of recruitment and retention rate reported as total number of participants recruited and retained.

    12 months

  • Adherence to Intervention

    Three quarters of participants should complete 80% of the prescribed intervention

    12 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Acceptability of the Intervention

    Measures administered during intake (baseline), immediately after one of sessions 6-10 depending on targets achieved, and 1 month post-treatment.

  • Acceptability of the Appropriateness

    Measures administered during intake (baseline), immediately after one of sessions 6-10 depending on targets achieved, and 1 month post-treatment.

  • Acceptability of the Feasibility

    Measures administered during intake (baseline), immediately after one of sessions 6-10 depending on targets achieved, and 1 month post-treatment.

Study Arms (2)

Therapy Group

EXPERIMENTAL

The Therapy Group will receive 6-10 individual sessions of 30-60 minutes each, delivered by a trained Occupational Therapist or Speech-Language Pathologist. The therapy will be delivered over a 4-week timeframe, with the total number of sessions per participant depending on the number of sessions needed to achieve their treatment targets. Each participant in the Therapy Group will identify three cognitive targets for treatment. Progress in reaching those targets will be documented using Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS)

Behavioral: Cognitive Rehabilitation

Educational Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The education group will receive information about self-management of cognitive symptoms at the time of randomization, a common intervention for adults with mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Other: Education

Interventions

A strategy-focused intervention aimed at improving everyday cognitive function, structured to maximize treatment dose over a short time period. The shorter time period of the treatment therapy is relative to the one and only current randomized controlled trial of cognitive rehabilitation for military mTBI, the Study of Cognitive Rehabilitation Effectiveness (SCORE).

Therapy Group

Educational materials, designed to help people with traumatic brain injury manage their everyday cognitive challenges will be provided through Zoom video conferencing software.

Educational Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 100 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Is a community-dwelling Canadian Armed Forces veteran.
  • Is age 18 years or older.
  • Self-identifies as a fluent English speaker.
  • Has no previous history of neurological disorder affecting cognition, by self-report.
  • Is able to participate in rehabilitation for 4 weeks: 3 weeks of treatment + baseline + outcome assessment, with potential rescheduling for missed sessions.
  • Is not actively participating in cognitive rehabilitation directed by a registered health professional (e.g., speech-language pathologist or occupational therapist).
  • Has access to an electronic device with Zoom video platform capacity and internet access.

You may not qualify if:

  • A score of less than 20 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), which indicates a risk for dementia.
  • Cannot identify at least 3 problems on the Common Cognitive Complaints after Concussion Questionnaire (C4), as there would be insufficient areas for intervention.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

McMaster University

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Location

Related Publications (13)

  • Garber BG, Rusu C, Zamorski MA. Deployment-related mild traumatic brain injury, mental health problems, and post-concussive symptoms in Canadian Armed Forces personnel. BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Nov 20;14:325. doi: 10.1186/s12888-014-0325-5.

    PMID: 25410348BACKGROUND
  • Soble JR, Silva MA, Vanderploeg RD, Curtiss G, Belanger HG, Donnell AJ, Scott SG. Normative Data for the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI) and post-concussion symptom profiles among TBI, PTSD, and nonclinical samples. Clin Neuropsychol. 2014;28(4):614-32. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2014.894576. Epub 2014 Mar 14.

    PMID: 24625213BACKGROUND
  • Tanev KS, Pentel KZ, Kredlow MA, Charney ME. PTSD and TBI co-morbidity: scope, clinical presentation and treatment options. Brain Inj. 2014;28(3):261-70. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2013.873821.

    PMID: 24568300BACKGROUND
  • Hoffman AN, Taylor AN. Stress reactivity after traumatic brain injury: implications for comorbid post-traumatic stress disorder. Behav Pharmacol. 2019 Apr;30(2 and 3-Spec Issue):115-121. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0000000000000461.

    PMID: 30640181BACKGROUND
  • Management of Concussion/mTBI Working Group. VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for Management of Concussion/Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2009;46(6):CP1-68. No abstract available.

    PMID: 20108447BACKGROUND
  • Loignon A, Ouellet MC, Belleville G. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on PTSD Following TBI Among Military/Veteran and Civilian Populations. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2020 Jan/Feb;35(1):E21-E35. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000514.

    PMID: 31479073BACKGROUND
  • Cicerone KD, Goldin Y, Ganci K, Rosenbaum A, Wethe JV, Langenbahn DM, Malec JF, Bergquist TF, Kingsley K, Nagele D, Trexler L, Fraas M, Bogdanova Y, Harley JP. Evidence-Based Cognitive Rehabilitation: Systematic Review of the Literature From 2009 Through 2014. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Aug;100(8):1515-1533. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.02.011. Epub 2019 Mar 26.

    PMID: 30926291BACKGROUND
  • Marshall S, Bayley M, McCullagh S, Velikonja D, Berrigan L, Ouchterlony D, Weegar K; mTBI Expert Consensus Group. Updated clinical practice guidelines for concussion/mild traumatic brain injury and persistent symptoms. Brain Inj. 2015;29(6):688-700. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2015.1004755. Epub 2015 Apr 14.

    PMID: 25871303BACKGROUND
  • Cooper DB, Bowles AO, Kennedy JE, Curtiss G, French LM, Tate DF, Vanderploeg RD. Cognitive Rehabilitation for Military Service Members With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2017 May/Jun;32(3):E1-E15. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000254.

    PMID: 27603763BACKGROUND
  • Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x.

    PMID: 15817019BACKGROUND
  • Malec JF, Smigielski JS, DePompolo RW. Goal attainment scaling and outcome measurement in postacute brain injury rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991 Feb;72(2):138-43.

    PMID: 1991015BACKGROUND
  • Blevins CA, Weathers FW, Davis MT, Witte TK, Domino JL. The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation. J Trauma Stress. 2015 Dec;28(6):489-98. doi: 10.1002/jts.22059. Epub 2015 Nov 25.

    PMID: 26606250BACKGROUND
  • Weiner BJ, Lewis CC, Stanick C, Powell BJ, Dorsey CN, Clary AS, Boynton MH, Halko H. Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implement Sci. 2017 Aug 29;12(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3.

    PMID: 28851459BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Brain Concussion

Interventions

Cognitive TrainingEducational Status

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Brain Injuries, TraumaticBrain InjuriesBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesCraniocerebral TraumaTrauma, Nervous SystemHead Injuries, ClosedWounds and InjuriesWounds, Nonpenetrating

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurological RehabilitationRehabilitationAftercareContinuity of Patient CarePatient CareTherapeuticsHealth ServicesHealth Care Facilities Workforce and ServicesSocioeconomic FactorsPopulation Characteristics

Study Officials

  • Lyn Turkstra, PhD

    McMaster University School of Rehabilitation Science

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Jackie Bosch, PhD

    McMaster University School of Rehabilitation Science

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Assessor will be blinded to randomization
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants will be randomized to either the Therapy (n=30) or Education Group (n=30). At the conclusion of therapy (for the Therapy Group) or after three weeks (for the Education Group), participants will be re-administered the outcome measures. The outcome measures using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), and Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) will then be compared during data analysis between the two groups.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 19, 2022

First Posted

August 30, 2022

Study Start

January 1, 2023

Primary Completion

August 1, 2024

Study Completion

August 1, 2024

Last Updated

January 23, 2025

Record last verified: 2024-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations