Bile Duct Drainage After ERCP Failure: EUS-BD vs PTBD
BESTDRAIN
1 other identifier
observational
61
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The vast majority of patients with distal biliary, pancreatic head or uncinate process cancer have jaundice caused by distal malignant obstruction (DMO) of the common bile duct. Biliary drainage by Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with trans-papillary stent placement is the treatment of choice. ERCP has a failure rate ranging from 12 - 25 percent. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) is the alternative conventional way to drain the biliary tree after ERCP failure, which is related with substantial morbidity (62%) and mortality (17%). Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is a novel promising drainage modality with reported excellent outcomes in terms of clinical success and complications. The implementation of EUS-BD besides ERCP and PTBD into Dutch daily clinical practice raises many questions related to performance, costs, QoL, training, implementation and overall oncological treatment success. This structured learning/proctoring program with an additional national registry provides insights into EUS-BD and how to implement EUS-BD in the Dutch standard of care.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Aug 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 25, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 29, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2024
CompletedApril 11, 2024
December 1, 2023
1.7 years
August 25, 2022
April 10, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Complications of PTBD vs EUS-BD
The primary outcome measure is a composite of severe complications occurring within 180 days following inclusion, analyzed by intention to treat. Complications we score are: bleeding, perforation, biliary leak, biliary peritonitis, abscess, haemobilia, stent occlusion, cholangitis, pancreatitis, anesthesia related complications, severe post-procedural pain, drain/stent dysfunction, cutaneous fistula, stent migration and drain leakage or dislocation.
180 days
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Technical success of the initial procedure
180 days
Clinical success
180 days
Length of hospital stay
180 days
Stent/drain patency
180 days
Treatment delay
180 days
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
PTBD after failed ERCP
Patients with a distal malignant obstruction undergoing placement of a percutaneous transhepatic biliary drain after failed ERCP.
EUS-BD after failed ERCP
Patients with a distal malignant obstruction undergoing EUS-guided biliary drainage after failed ERCP.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients aged 18 years or older with a distal malignant obstruction of the common bile duct with failure of drainage by the initial ERCP will be included in this study. Failed biliary drainage is defined as failed common bile duct cannulation during ERCP by an experienced advanced endoscopist (\>100 ERCP/year, case load \> 500 ERCP).
You may qualify if:
- years and older
- Distal malignant CBD obstruction (from ampulla to 1cm distal to the hilum)
- Indication for biliary drainage after failed ERCP-guided biliary drainage
You may not qualify if:
- Previous PTBD and/or EUS-BD
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Pregnancy
- American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) Grade IV-V
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Radboudumc
Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6525GA, Netherlands
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 180 Days
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 25, 2022
First Posted
August 29, 2022
Study Start
August 1, 2022
Primary Completion
April 1, 2024
Study Completion
July 1, 2024
Last Updated
April 11, 2024
Record last verified: 2023-12