NCT05515991

Brief Summary

This is a parallel arm, pilot study used to examine the feasibility of electronic patient reported outcome measures (ePROMs) for symptom assessment and monitoring as well as a linked self-management support and decision support information hub (https://symptomcare.org) to facilitate symptom management for patients on maintenance hemodialysis. Two dialysis centers will be included in the study, with one center receiving SUPPORT-Dialysis (intervention arm) and the other receiving standard care (control arm).

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
36

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2023

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 16, 2022

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 25, 2022

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 19, 2023

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 9, 2024

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

May 2, 2025

Status Verified

April 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

August 16, 2022

Last Update Submit

April 29, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

end-stage renal diseasehemodialysisdialysischronic kidney diseasekidney failure

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Recruitment Target

    Feasibility of toolkit will be confirmed if recruitment target of 30 participants at each site are obtained in a 3-month period of the pilot.

    Baseline

  • Proportion of Eligible Patients who decline consent

    Feasibility of toolkit will be confirmed if decline rate is \<50% for eligible patients.

    Baseline

  • Proportion of Participants who miss or refuse ePROMs follow-ups

    Feasibility of toolkit will be confirmed if \<30% of participants complete \<50% of all follow-up visits.

    Baseline to follow-up (6 months)

  • Proportion of Enrolled Patients who Drop-Out From the Study

    Feasibility of toolkit will be confirmed if the dropout rate is \< 30%.

    Baseline to follow-up (6 months)

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Patient Acceptability

    Follow-up (every 4 weeks, up to 6 months)

  • Clinical Team Acceptability

    Follow-up (every 4 weeks, up to 6 months)

Other Outcomes (4)

  • Incidence Rate of Healthcare Use

    Baseline to Follow-up (6 months)

  • Physical Health Component Score

    Baseline to Follow-up (6 months)

  • Mental Health Component Score

    Baseline to Follow-up (6 months)

  • +1 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

SUPPORT-DIALYSIS with Access to Output Report and Information Hub

EXPERIMENTAL

Feasibility of SUPPORT-Dialysis at Toronto General Hospital

Other: SUPPORT-DIALYSIS with Access to Output Report and Information Hub

SUPPORT-DIALYSIS Only

EXPERIMENTAL

Usual Treatment at Humber River Hospital

Other: SUPPORT-DIALYSIS Only

Interventions

SUPPORT-Dialysis is a symptom assessment response toolkit, consisting of a screening and response component. Participants will be screened for symptoms and distress using an electronic assessment(ePROMs). Output reports based on ePROMs scores will be provided to patients as well as the clinical care team. Participants at Toronto General Hospital will complete the screening every 4 weeks for 6 months, and each time the output report will be provided to both patients and the clinical team.The second, response component of the intervention is the information support and self-management hub (https://symptomcare.org). All participants and the clinical team will be given access to this website, which provides information about self-management for patients as well as management advice for healthcare professionals.

SUPPORT-DIALYSIS with Access to Output Report and Information Hub

SUPPORT-Dialysis screening will also be implemented at Humber River Hospital, but participants and clinical team will not be receiving the output screening report or be given access to the information hub with symptom management resources.

SUPPORT-DIALYSIS Only

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis for more than 3 months

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with severe acute illness or condition that hampers questionnaire completion assessed by clinical team.
  • Dementia indicated in the medical record, indicated by the managing healthcare team.
  • Unable to understand English - as assessed by clinical team.
  • Life expectancy \< 6 months as assessed by main responsible nephrologist.
  • Unwilling or unable to provide informed consent.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Etobicoke General Hospital

Brampton, Ontario, M9V 0A9, Canada

Location

Toronto General Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, M5G2C4, Canada

Location

Related Publications (13)

  • Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8.

    PMID: 3558716BACKGROUND
  • Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.

    PMID: 11556941BACKGROUND
  • Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.

    PMID: 16717171BACKGROUND
  • Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Kroenke K, Hornyak R, McMurray J. Validity and utility of the PRIME-MD patient health questionnaire in assessment of 3000 obstetric-gynecologic patients: the PRIME-MD Patient Health Questionnaire Obstetrics-Gynecology Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Sep;183(3):759-69. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.106580.

    PMID: 10992206BACKGROUND
  • Davison SN, Jhangri GS, Johnson JA. Longitudinal validation of a modified Edmonton symptom assessment system (ESAS) in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006 Nov;21(11):3189-95. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfl380. Epub 2006 Sep 6.

    PMID: 16957010BACKGROUND
  • Bruce B, Fries JF. The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire: dimensions and practical applications. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 Jun 9;1:20. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-20.

    PMID: 12831398BACKGROUND
  • Garin O, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Almansa J, Nieto M, Chatterji S, Vilagut G, Alonso J, Cieza A, Svetskova O, Burger H, Racca V, Francescutti C, Vieta E, Kostanjsek N, Raggi A, Leonardi M, Ferrer M; MHADIE consortium. Validation of the "World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS-2" in patients with chronic diseases. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 May 19;8:51. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-51.

    PMID: 20482853BACKGROUND
  • Van Belle S, Paridaens R, Evers G, Kerger J, Bron D, Foubert J, Ponnet G, Vander Steichel D, Heremans C, Rosillon D. Comparison of proposed diagnostic criteria with FACT-F and VAS for cancer-related fatigue: proposal for use as a screening tool. Support Care Cancer. 2005 Apr;13(4):246-54. doi: 10.1007/s00520-004-0734-y. Epub 2004 Nov 12.

    PMID: 15549424BACKGROUND
  • Tam E, Chen J, Zhang Q, et al. Routine physical function assessment through a Branching Logic Electronic Symptom Survey (BLESS) vs. the 32-combined item HAQ-DI + WHODAS (HW) survey: A quality improvement controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2017;35:136.

    BACKGROUND
  • Howell D, Liu G. Can routine collection of patient reported outcome data actually improve person-centered health? Healthc Pap. 2011;11(4):42-7; discussion 55-8. doi: 10.12927/hcpap.2012.22703.

    PMID: 22543292BACKGROUND
  • Dudgeon D, King S, Howell D, Green E, Gilbert J, Hughes E, Lalonde B, Angus H, Sawka C. Cancer Care Ontario's experience with implementation of routine physical and psychological symptom distress screening. Psychooncology. 2012 Apr;21(4):357-64. doi: 10.1002/pon.1918. Epub 2011 Feb 8.

    PMID: 21308858BACKGROUND
  • Barbera L, Sutradhar R, Howell D, Sussman J, Seow H, Dudgeon D, Atzema C, Earle C, Husain A, Liu Y, Krzyzanowska MK. Does routine symptom screening with ESAS decrease ED visits in breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy? Support Care Cancer. 2015 Oct;23(10):3025-32. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2671-3. Epub 2015 Feb 26.

    PMID: 25711657BACKGROUND
  • Gill JK, Pucci M, Samudio A, Ahmed T, Siddiqui R, Edwards N, Marticorena RM, Donnelly S, Lok C, Wentlandt K, Wolofsky K, Mucsi I. Self-reported MeasUrement of Physical and PsychosOcial Symptoms Response Tool (SUPPORT-dialysis): systematic symptom assessment and management in patients on in-centre haemodialysis - a parallel arm, non-randomised feasibility pilot study protocol. BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 30;14(1):e080712. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080712.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Kidney Failure, ChronicRenal Insufficiency, ChronicRenal Insufficiency

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Kidney DiseasesUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesChronic DiseaseDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Istvan Mucsi

    University Health Network, Toronto

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SCREENING
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 16, 2022

First Posted

August 25, 2022

Study Start

April 19, 2023

Primary Completion

January 9, 2024

Study Completion

December 1, 2025

Last Updated

May 2, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in publications, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices).

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL
Time Frame
Beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication.
Access Criteria
Researchers who provide a methodologically sound purpose to achieve aims in the approved proposal or for individual participant data meta-analysis. Proposals should be directed to istvan.mucsi@uhn.ca. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement. Data are available for 5 years at a third party website.

Locations