Symptom Management in Patients on Dialysis
Assessing the Feasibility of Self-reported MeasUrement of Physical and PsychosOcial Symptoms and Response Tool in Patients on Dialysis- Pilot Study
2 other identifiers
interventional
36
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This is a parallel arm, pilot study used to examine the feasibility of electronic patient reported outcome measures (ePROMs) for symptom assessment and monitoring as well as a linked self-management support and decision support information hub (https://symptomcare.org) to facilitate symptom management for patients on maintenance hemodialysis. Two dialysis centers will be included in the study, with one center receiving SUPPORT-Dialysis (intervention arm) and the other receiving standard care (control arm).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 16, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 25, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 19, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 9, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2025
CompletedMay 2, 2025
April 1, 2025
9 months
August 16, 2022
April 29, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Recruitment Target
Feasibility of toolkit will be confirmed if recruitment target of 30 participants at each site are obtained in a 3-month period of the pilot.
Baseline
Proportion of Eligible Patients who decline consent
Feasibility of toolkit will be confirmed if decline rate is \<50% for eligible patients.
Baseline
Proportion of Participants who miss or refuse ePROMs follow-ups
Feasibility of toolkit will be confirmed if \<30% of participants complete \<50% of all follow-up visits.
Baseline to follow-up (6 months)
Proportion of Enrolled Patients who Drop-Out From the Study
Feasibility of toolkit will be confirmed if the dropout rate is \< 30%.
Baseline to follow-up (6 months)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Patient Acceptability
Follow-up (every 4 weeks, up to 6 months)
Clinical Team Acceptability
Follow-up (every 4 weeks, up to 6 months)
Other Outcomes (4)
Incidence Rate of Healthcare Use
Baseline to Follow-up (6 months)
Physical Health Component Score
Baseline to Follow-up (6 months)
Mental Health Component Score
Baseline to Follow-up (6 months)
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
SUPPORT-DIALYSIS with Access to Output Report and Information Hub
EXPERIMENTALFeasibility of SUPPORT-Dialysis at Toronto General Hospital
SUPPORT-DIALYSIS Only
EXPERIMENTALUsual Treatment at Humber River Hospital
Interventions
SUPPORT-Dialysis is a symptom assessment response toolkit, consisting of a screening and response component. Participants will be screened for symptoms and distress using an electronic assessment(ePROMs). Output reports based on ePROMs scores will be provided to patients as well as the clinical care team. Participants at Toronto General Hospital will complete the screening every 4 weeks for 6 months, and each time the output report will be provided to both patients and the clinical team.The second, response component of the intervention is the information support and self-management hub (https://symptomcare.org). All participants and the clinical team will be given access to this website, which provides information about self-management for patients as well as management advice for healthcare professionals.
SUPPORT-Dialysis screening will also be implemented at Humber River Hospital, but participants and clinical team will not be receiving the output screening report or be given access to the information hub with symptom management resources.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis for more than 3 months
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with severe acute illness or condition that hampers questionnaire completion assessed by clinical team.
- Dementia indicated in the medical record, indicated by the managing healthcare team.
- Unable to understand English - as assessed by clinical team.
- Life expectancy \< 6 months as assessed by main responsible nephrologist.
- Unwilling or unable to provide informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Health Network, Torontolead
- Humber River Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Etobicoke General Hospital
Brampton, Ontario, M9V 0A9, Canada
Toronto General Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G2C4, Canada
Related Publications (13)
Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8.
PMID: 3558716BACKGROUNDKroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.
PMID: 11556941BACKGROUNDSpitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.
PMID: 16717171BACKGROUNDSpitzer RL, Williams JB, Kroenke K, Hornyak R, McMurray J. Validity and utility of the PRIME-MD patient health questionnaire in assessment of 3000 obstetric-gynecologic patients: the PRIME-MD Patient Health Questionnaire Obstetrics-Gynecology Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Sep;183(3):759-69. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.106580.
PMID: 10992206BACKGROUNDDavison SN, Jhangri GS, Johnson JA. Longitudinal validation of a modified Edmonton symptom assessment system (ESAS) in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006 Nov;21(11):3189-95. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfl380. Epub 2006 Sep 6.
PMID: 16957010BACKGROUNDBruce B, Fries JF. The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire: dimensions and practical applications. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 Jun 9;1:20. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-20.
PMID: 12831398BACKGROUNDGarin O, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Almansa J, Nieto M, Chatterji S, Vilagut G, Alonso J, Cieza A, Svetskova O, Burger H, Racca V, Francescutti C, Vieta E, Kostanjsek N, Raggi A, Leonardi M, Ferrer M; MHADIE consortium. Validation of the "World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS-2" in patients with chronic diseases. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 May 19;8:51. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-51.
PMID: 20482853BACKGROUNDVan Belle S, Paridaens R, Evers G, Kerger J, Bron D, Foubert J, Ponnet G, Vander Steichel D, Heremans C, Rosillon D. Comparison of proposed diagnostic criteria with FACT-F and VAS for cancer-related fatigue: proposal for use as a screening tool. Support Care Cancer. 2005 Apr;13(4):246-54. doi: 10.1007/s00520-004-0734-y. Epub 2004 Nov 12.
PMID: 15549424BACKGROUNDTam E, Chen J, Zhang Q, et al. Routine physical function assessment through a Branching Logic Electronic Symptom Survey (BLESS) vs. the 32-combined item HAQ-DI + WHODAS (HW) survey: A quality improvement controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2017;35:136.
BACKGROUNDHowell D, Liu G. Can routine collection of patient reported outcome data actually improve person-centered health? Healthc Pap. 2011;11(4):42-7; discussion 55-8. doi: 10.12927/hcpap.2012.22703.
PMID: 22543292BACKGROUNDDudgeon D, King S, Howell D, Green E, Gilbert J, Hughes E, Lalonde B, Angus H, Sawka C. Cancer Care Ontario's experience with implementation of routine physical and psychological symptom distress screening. Psychooncology. 2012 Apr;21(4):357-64. doi: 10.1002/pon.1918. Epub 2011 Feb 8.
PMID: 21308858BACKGROUNDBarbera L, Sutradhar R, Howell D, Sussman J, Seow H, Dudgeon D, Atzema C, Earle C, Husain A, Liu Y, Krzyzanowska MK. Does routine symptom screening with ESAS decrease ED visits in breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy? Support Care Cancer. 2015 Oct;23(10):3025-32. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2671-3. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
PMID: 25711657BACKGROUNDGill JK, Pucci M, Samudio A, Ahmed T, Siddiqui R, Edwards N, Marticorena RM, Donnelly S, Lok C, Wentlandt K, Wolofsky K, Mucsi I. Self-reported MeasUrement of Physical and PsychosOcial Symptoms Response Tool (SUPPORT-dialysis): systematic symptom assessment and management in patients on in-centre haemodialysis - a parallel arm, non-randomised feasibility pilot study protocol. BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 30;14(1):e080712. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080712.
PMID: 38296283DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Istvan Mucsi
University Health Network, Toronto
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 16, 2022
First Posted
August 25, 2022
Study Start
April 19, 2023
Primary Completion
January 9, 2024
Study Completion
December 1, 2025
Last Updated
May 2, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- Beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication.
- Access Criteria
- Researchers who provide a methodologically sound purpose to achieve aims in the approved proposal or for individual participant data meta-analysis. Proposals should be directed to istvan.mucsi@uhn.ca. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement. Data are available for 5 years at a third party website.
Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in publications, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices).