NCT05515211

Brief Summary

Background: The burden of preterm and low birth weight babies (LBW) is high in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Therefore, assessment of gestational age (GA) and birth weight is important. The GA is assessed using a reliable last menstrual period (LMP), measuring fundal height, using ultrasound for dating, or postnatally using Ballard, Dubowitz, or Eregie scores. However, each method has some limitations. Pregnant women in LMIC are not able to recall LMP and are also unreliable when menstrual cycles are irregular, fundal height is often imprecise and subject to variation due to observer bias, uterine pathologies, abdominal obesity, amniotic fluid volume, fetal position, and ultrasound in a rural setting is often unreliable because lack of trained sonologist, power failures, and maintenance of ultrasound machine. Post-natal GA scoring is also lengthy, subjective, and time-consuming. Similarly, determining birth weight has many challenges. In Thatta, weighing scales are only available in health facilities, therefore, birth weight is available for babies born in the health facilities. Furthermore, even where weighing scales are available, the calibration and maintenance are not without challenges, especially in the extremely hot climate. In the majority of studies, foot length has been validated for determining GA and birth weight, with LMP serving as the gold standard, which has limitations in our population. In a meta-analysis on the diagnostic accuracy of foot length to identify preterm and LBW, researchers emphasized the need for studies using high-quality ultrasound as a reference standard for early dating. Hence, there is a need to develop a simple and effective method of GA and birth weight that healthcare providers of all levels including mid-level healthcare workers in remote areas can use with reasonable accuracy. Objectives of the study The primary objectives of the study are to determine the diagnostic accuracy of foot length in predicting GA and low birth weight using ultrasound conducted between 6-20 weeks for the predicted estimated date of delivery (EDD) as the gold standard. Secondary objectives of the study are, 1) to develop the regression equations that predict gestational age and low birth weight using foot length, 2) to assess the use of foot length measurement as a screening tool to identify LBW or preterm infants in a community-based setting, and 3) to develop percentile charts of foot length for gestational age and low birth weight Methods: This test validation study will be conducted in Global Network's Maternal and Newborn Health Registry catchment area. All live birth singleton babies who have a first-trimester ultrasound for gestational age and birth weight within 48 hours of birth will be included in this study. Stillbirths, multiple pregnancies, gross congenital malformations such as neural tube defects, omphalocele, etc., club foot, and babies with chromosomal abnormalities such as Down syndrome that make measuring foot length difficult, will be excluded from the study. Gestational age will be assessed using ultrasound between 6-20 weeks of gestation by a trained sonographer working in the registry. Neonatal assessment having neuromuscular, and physical signs will be conducted by the research assistants (RA). RA will be taking anthropometric measurements such as birth weight using calibrated weighing scales, foot length, mid-upper arm circumference, and fronto-occipital circumference. The data will be entered in Epicollect data five. Sensitivity, specificity, positive \& negative predictive value, likelihood ratios, and diagnostic accuracy will be done using different cut-offs of foot length against ultrasound estimated gestational age and birth weight. Receivers operating characteristics (ROC) curves will be generated to identify the optimal cut-off point for foot length taken within 24 hours of birth for identification of prematurity and LBW (based on first-trimester ultrasound) with ≥80% sensitivity. Linear regression will be done for estimating predictive values of foot length by GA. Pentile charts for foot length (FL) against GA will be derived. Bland Altman's analyses will identify and quantify any biases inherent to the tool. Public health implications: If these equations predict gestational age and birth weight with accuracy, an android-based application can be developed for health care providers (HCP) who simply measure foot length and enter it into the application to identify preterm \&/or low birth weight along with referred guidelines for early treatment. This is one step closer to Every Newborn Action Plan's goal of lowering neonatal mortality to 12/1000 LB by 2030.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
336

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2022

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 23, 2022

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 25, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 7, 2022

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2023

Completed
13 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 13, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

July 14, 2023

Status Verified

July 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

August 23, 2022

Last Update Submit

July 12, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Gestational agebirth weightDiagnostic accuracyRegression equationCorrelation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Diagnostic accuracy of foot length for preterm baby

    Diagnostic accuracy defined as sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios

    Within 48 hours of birth

  • Diagnostic accuracy of foot length for low birth weight baby

    Diagnostic accuracy defined as sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios

    Within 48 hours of birth

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Small for gestational age

    Within 48 hours of birth

Interventions

Foot lengthDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Foot length will be measured from the midpoint of the heel to the longest toe.

Eligibility Criteria

Age0 Hours - 48 Hours
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Singleton alive newborns

You may qualify if:

  • All livebirth singleton babies
  • Having first-trimester ultrasound for gestational age
  • Birth weight measured within 48 hours of birth

You may not qualify if:

  • Stillbirths
  • Multiple pregnancies
  • Gross congenital malformations such as neural tube defects, omphalocele, etc.,
  • Club foot
  • Pregnant women whose ultrasound dating differs between sonographers and senior radiologists

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Community of Thatta

Thatta, Sindh, 73130, Pakistan

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Tikmani SS, Brown N, Inayat Ali A, Martensson A, Saleem S, Martensson T. Postnatal foot length measurement as a proxy to identify low birth weight for frontline health workers in rural Sindh Province, Pakistan: a diagnostic accuracy study. BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 26;14(12):e089153. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089153.

  • Tikmani SS, Brown N, Inayat A, Martensson A, Saleem S, Martensson T. Diagnostic accuracy of foot length measurement for identification of preterm newborn in rural Sindh, Pakistan. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2024 Jan 24;8(1):e002316. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2023-002316.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Premature BirthBirth Weight

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Obstetric Labor, PrematureObstetric Labor ComplicationsPregnancy ComplicationsFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesBody WeightSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 23, 2022

First Posted

August 25, 2022

Study Start

November 7, 2022

Primary Completion

June 30, 2023

Study Completion

July 13, 2023

Last Updated

July 14, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-07

Locations