BCT-HA Kit for Dehydrated and Wrinkled Skin
Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Cellular MAtrix™ BCT-HA Kit as a New Treatment Option for Dehydrated and Wrinkled Skin (A Clinical and Histological Evaluation)
1 other identifier
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will assess the efficacy of Cellular MatrixTM BCT-HA Kit treatment compared to placebo condition on revitalization and skin rejuvenation on the midface. Particular attention will be made to the safety aspects, as well as the histological consequences of treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for early_phase_1
Started Jun 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 10, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 25, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 24, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 29, 2024
CompletedApril 29, 2024
April 1, 2024
1.3 years
July 25, 2022
April 26, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Change in Skin Quality Rating Scale
Skin Quality Rating Scale is a 10 point scales used to assess skin quality, including radiance, smoothness, pigmentation, erythema, and pore size.
Week 32
Change in Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale
This is a 7 point scale to assess degree of improvement of facial skin after treatment.
Week 32
Change in FACE-Q Score
The following eight FACE-Q scales: (1) satisfaction with overall facial appearance (measures patient satisfaction with the overall appearance of their face); (2) satisfaction with decision (measures patient satisfaction with their decision to undergo the procedure;(3) cheekbones; (4) chin; (5) cheeks; (6) lower face; (7) jawline; and (8) nasolabial folds (items 3 through 8 measure overall and area-specific appearance appraisal to evaluate satisfaction with specific facial areas). Higher FACE-Q scores indicate superior satisfaction
Week 32
Physician's Global assessment to measure quality of life
Patient rating of improvement in treated area ranging from 1 to 5, with 5 being worse.
4 weeks after treatment 1st, 2nd and 3rd treatments and 32 weeks after enrollment
Visual Analog Score for patients
Visual analog rating of pain associated with treatment administration ranging between 0 and 10, pain scale.
Immediately after 1st, 2nd and 3rd treatments
Wrinkle assessment
Wrinkle Assessment Score is a 9 point scale to asses severity of wrinkles.
Week 32
Study Arms (3)
combined HA with PRP
EXPERIMENTALHyaluronic acid and PRP combination treatment
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORsaline solution
PRP
ACTIVE COMPARATORPlatelet rich plasma without hyaluronic acid
Interventions
Injections with platelet-rich plasma and hyaluronic acid
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects who are able to give voluntary, written informed consent to participate in this study and from whom consent has been obtained including HIPPA Authorization
- Healthy men and women, ages 30 - 65 years of age
- Subjects with Fitzpatrick photo skin type I-VI
- Subjects with moderate to severe nasolabial folds contour deficiencies or other facial wrinkles. Degree of nasolabial folds or other facial wrinkles will be determined on the basis of the Wrinkles Severity Rating Scale
- Subjects who agree not to have any other procedures of affecting skin quality (microdermabrasion, peels, acne treatments, toxin, fillers etc.) for the duration of the study
- Subjects who understand the study and are able to follow study instructions and are willing to attend the required study visits.
- Subjects who agree to be photographed for research purposes and their identity may not be concealed in these photographs.
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects who have had any kind of aesthetic therapy (peeling, laser, ultrasound, toxins, fillers) in the facial area during the last 6 months
- Presence of implant in the facial area to treat
- Contraindications to the use of antiseptics (Biseptine, Amukine)
- Subjects who have an active or known skin inflammation or infection within the treatment area.
- Subjects who have an active or known acute skin allergies
- Subjects who have a known allergy to hyaluronic acid
- Subjects who have any other dermatologic conditions including acne, rosacea, eczema, psoriasis, actinic keratosis, severe sun damage, infection, or scars within the treatment area.
- Subjects of child-bearing potential who are not using an approved method of birth control (oral contraceptives, IUD, contraceptive implant, barrier methods with spermicide or abstinence). Females of non-childbearing potential are defined as post-menopausal (absence of menstrual bleeding for one year), hysterectomy, or bilateral oophorectomy.
- Subjects who are pregnant, planning to become pregnant or breastfeeding. A urine pregnancy test will be done to rule out pregnancy.
- Subjects who have been diagnosed with diabetes
- Subjects who are Immunosuppressed
- Subjects who are HIV+ / VHB+ / VHC+
- Subjects who have had/will have a COVID vaccine within 2 weeks of study participation
- Subjects who have had/will have a dental procedure within 4 weeks of study participation
- Subjects with a history of severe bee allergy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Maria Hordinsky, MD
University of Minnesota
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- early phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The participant, investigator, and dermatopathologist (outcomes assessor) will all be blinded to which group the participant belongs too. Given the color difference of the injected solutions, the syringes with the injection material (HA with PRP or saline) will be masked to prevent the patient or investigator from knowing which material they are injecting.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 25, 2022
First Posted
August 24, 2022
Study Start
June 10, 2022
Primary Completion
October 1, 2023
Study Completion
February 29, 2024
Last Updated
April 29, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04