NCT05514834

Brief Summary

This study will assess the efficacy of Cellular MatrixTM BCT-HA Kit treatment compared to placebo condition on revitalization and skin rejuvenation on the midface. Particular attention will be made to the safety aspects, as well as the histological consequences of treatment.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
15

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for early_phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 10, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 25, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 24, 2022

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2023

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 29, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

April 29, 2024

Status Verified

April 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

July 25, 2022

Last Update Submit

April 26, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

rhytideswrinklesfacial agingPRPhyaluronic acid

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Change in Skin Quality Rating Scale

    Skin Quality Rating Scale is a 10 point scales used to assess skin quality, including radiance, smoothness, pigmentation, erythema, and pore size.

    Week 32

  • Change in Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale

    This is a 7 point scale to assess degree of improvement of facial skin after treatment.

    Week 32

  • Change in FACE-Q Score

    The following eight FACE-Q scales: (1) satisfaction with overall facial appearance (measures patient satisfaction with the overall appearance of their face); (2) satisfaction with decision (measures patient satisfaction with their decision to undergo the procedure;(3) cheekbones; (4) chin; (5) cheeks; (6) lower face; (7) jawline; and (8) nasolabial folds (items 3 through 8 measure overall and area-specific appearance appraisal to evaluate satisfaction with specific facial areas). Higher FACE-Q scores indicate superior satisfaction

    Week 32

  • Physician's Global assessment to measure quality of life

    Patient rating of improvement in treated area ranging from 1 to 5, with 5 being worse.

    4 weeks after treatment 1st, 2nd and 3rd treatments and 32 weeks after enrollment

  • Visual Analog Score for patients

    Visual analog rating of pain associated with treatment administration ranging between 0 and 10, pain scale.

    Immediately after 1st, 2nd and 3rd treatments

  • Wrinkle assessment

    Wrinkle Assessment Score is a 9 point scale to asses severity of wrinkles.

    Week 32

Study Arms (3)

combined HA with PRP

EXPERIMENTAL

Hyaluronic acid and PRP combination treatment

Device: Cellular Matrix TM BCT-HA Kit (ref. BCT-HA-3)

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

saline solution

Other: Placebo

PRP

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Platelet rich plasma without hyaluronic acid

Other: PRP Only

Interventions

Injections with platelet-rich plasma and hyaluronic acid

combined HA with PRP

platelet rich plasma without hyaluronic acid

PRP
PlaceboOTHER

Neither PRP nor hyaluronic acid

Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age30 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subjects who are able to give voluntary, written informed consent to participate in this study and from whom consent has been obtained including HIPPA Authorization
  • Healthy men and women, ages 30 - 65 years of age
  • Subjects with Fitzpatrick photo skin type I-VI
  • Subjects with moderate to severe nasolabial folds contour deficiencies or other facial wrinkles. Degree of nasolabial folds or other facial wrinkles will be determined on the basis of the Wrinkles Severity Rating Scale
  • Subjects who agree not to have any other procedures of affecting skin quality (microdermabrasion, peels, acne treatments, toxin, fillers etc.) for the duration of the study
  • Subjects who understand the study and are able to follow study instructions and are willing to attend the required study visits.
  • Subjects who agree to be photographed for research purposes and their identity may not be concealed in these photographs.

You may not qualify if:

  • Subjects who have had any kind of aesthetic therapy (peeling, laser, ultrasound, toxins, fillers) in the facial area during the last 6 months
  • Presence of implant in the facial area to treat
  • Contraindications to the use of antiseptics (Biseptine, Amukine)
  • Subjects who have an active or known skin inflammation or infection within the treatment area.
  • Subjects who have an active or known acute skin allergies
  • Subjects who have a known allergy to hyaluronic acid
  • Subjects who have any other dermatologic conditions including acne, rosacea, eczema, psoriasis, actinic keratosis, severe sun damage, infection, or scars within the treatment area.
  • Subjects of child-bearing potential who are not using an approved method of birth control (oral contraceptives, IUD, contraceptive implant, barrier methods with spermicide or abstinence). Females of non-childbearing potential are defined as post-menopausal (absence of menstrual bleeding for one year), hysterectomy, or bilateral oophorectomy.
  • Subjects who are pregnant, planning to become pregnant or breastfeeding. A urine pregnancy test will be done to rule out pregnancy.
  • Subjects who have been diagnosed with diabetes
  • Subjects who are Immunosuppressed
  • Subjects who are HIV+ / VHB+ / VHC+
  • Subjects who have had/will have a COVID vaccine within 2 weeks of study participation
  • Subjects who have had/will have a dental procedure within 4 weeks of study participation
  • Subjects with a history of severe bee allergy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Minnesota

Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States

Location

Study Officials

  • Maria Hordinsky, MD

    University of Minnesota

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
early phase 1
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The participant, investigator, and dermatopathologist (outcomes assessor) will all be blinded to which group the participant belongs too. Given the color difference of the injected solutions, the syringes with the injection material (HA with PRP or saline) will be masked to prevent the patient or investigator from knowing which material they are injecting.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Blinded, randomized control trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 25, 2022

First Posted

August 24, 2022

Study Start

June 10, 2022

Primary Completion

October 1, 2023

Study Completion

February 29, 2024

Last Updated

April 29, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-04

Locations