NCT05514301

Brief Summary

This study is a clinical validation of Polydeep, a computer-aided polyp detection (CADe) and characterization (CADx) system. Polydeep Advance 1 is an unicentric prospective diagnostic tests trial with a paired study design. The hypothesis of the study is that Polydeep, a CAD system, is more sensitive than a blinded endoscopists for the detection of colorectal polyps in a high definition colonoscopy.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
205

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2023

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 22, 2022

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 24, 2022

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 30, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 15, 2023

Completed
27 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 11, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

February 24, 2025

Status Verified

May 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

August 22, 2022

Last Update Submit

February 21, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Colorectal adenomasColorectal polypsSerrated lesionsComputer-Aided detection System (CAD)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Sensitivity of polydeep vs high experienced endoscopist blinded to polydeep

    To compare the sensitivity of Polydeep to a high experienced endoscopist for colorectal polyp detection (adenoma or serrated lesion histologically confirmed)

    1 year

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Sensitivity for serrated lesions detection.

    1 year

  • Sensitivity for adenoma detection.

    1 year

  • Sensitivity for advanced colonic lesions

    1 year

  • Sensitivity for diminute lesions (≤5mm)

    1 year

  • To compare the diagnostic yield of the optical diagnosis

    1 year

Study Arms (1)

Sensitivity of Polydeep vs high experienced endoscopists for colorectal polyp detection

EXPERIMENTAL

Both diagnostic interventions will be performed in all patients: High definition colonoscopy and Polydeep system.

Diagnostic Test: Sensitivity of Polydeep vs high experienced endoscopists for colorectal polyp detection

Interventions

Both diagnostic interventions will be performed in all patients 1. High definition colonoscopy performed by high experienced endoscopists blinded to Polydeep. 2. Polydeep: a CADe and CADx system. The gold standard will be the histological diagnosis of the lesion.

Sensitivity of Polydeep vs high experienced endoscopists for colorectal polyp detection

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 79 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • First diagnostic colonoscopy performed after a positive fecal immunochemical test performed within the CRC screening program.
  • Surveillance after resection of colorectal adenomas.
  • Acceptance after reading the information sheet and signing the informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Colonoscopies with insufficient intestinal cleansing (Boston Bowel Preparation Scale \<6 or \<2 in any of the evaluated segments).
  • Detected lesions without histologic diagnosis.
  • Previous CRC
  • Previous colonic resection
  • Hereditary CRC syndromes
  • Serrated polyposis syndrome
  • Incomplete colonoscopy without cecal intubation.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense

Ourense, Ourense, 32002, Spain

Location

Related Publications (11)

  • Cubiella J, Marzo-Castillejo M, Mascort-Roca JJ, Amador-Romero FJ, Bellas-Beceiro B, Clofent-Vilaplana J, Carballal S, Ferrandiz-Santos J, Gimeno-Garcia AZ, Jover R, Mangas-Sanjuan C, Moreira L, Pellise M, Quintero E, Rodriguez-Camacho E, Vega-Villaamil P; Sociedad Espanola de Medicina de Familia y Comunitaria y Asociacion Espanola de Gastroenterologia. Clinical practice guideline. Diagnosis and prevention of colorectal cancer. 2018 Update. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Nov;41(9):585-596. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2018.07.012. Epub 2018 Sep 20. English, Spanish.

    PMID: 30245076BACKGROUND
  • Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, Zhao WK, Lee JK, Doubeni CA, Zauber AG, de Boer J, Fireman BH, Schottinger JE, Quinn VP, Ghai NR, Levin TR, Quesenberry CP. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med. 2014 Apr 3;370(14):1298-306. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1309086.

    PMID: 24693890BACKGROUND
  • Zhao S, Wang S, Pan P, Xia T, Chang X, Yang X, Guo L, Meng Q, Yang F, Qian W, Xu Z, Wang Y, Wang Z, Gu L, Wang R, Jia F, Yao J, Li Z, Bai Y. Magnitude, Risk Factors, and Factors Associated With Adenoma Miss Rate of Tandem Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2019 May;156(6):1661-1674.e11. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.260. Epub 2019 Feb 6.

    PMID: 30738046BACKGROUND
  • ASGE Technology Committee; Abu Dayyeh BK, Thosani N, Konda V, Wallace MB, Rex DK, Chauhan SS, Hwang JH, Komanduri S, Manfredi M, Maple JT, Murad FM, Siddiqui UD, Banerjee S. ASGE Technology Committee systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE PIVI thresholds for adopting real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar;81(3):502.e1-502.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.022. Epub 2015 Jan 16.

    PMID: 25597420BACKGROUND
  • Puig I, Lopez-Ceron M, Arnau A, Rosinol O, Cuatrecasas M, Herreros-de-Tejada A, Ferrandez A, Serra-Burriel M, Nogales O, Vida F, de Castro L, Lopez-Vicente J, Vega P, Alvarez-Gonzalez MA, Gonzalez-Santiago J, Hernandez-Conde M, Diez-Redondo P, Rivero-Sanchez L, Gimeno-Garcia AZ, Burgos A, Garcia-Alonso FJ, Bustamante-Balen M, Martinez-Bauer E, Penas B, Pellise M; EndoCAR group, Spanish Gastroenterological Association and the Spanish Digestive Endoscopy Society. Accuracy of the Narrow-Band Imaging International Colorectal Endoscopic Classification System in Identification of Deep Invasion in Colorectal Polyps. Gastroenterology. 2019 Jan;156(1):75-87. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Oct 6.

    PMID: 30296432BACKGROUND
  • Jin EH, Lee D, Bae JH, Kang HY, Kwak MS, Seo JY, Yang JI, Yang SY, Lim SH, Yim JY, Lim JH, Chung GE, Chung SJ, Choi JM, Han YM, Kang SJ, Lee J, Chan Kim H, Kim JS. Improved Accuracy in Optical Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps Using Convolutional Neural Networks with Visual Explanations. Gastroenterology. 2020 Jun;158(8):2169-2179.e8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.02.036. Epub 2020 Feb 29.

    PMID: 32119927BACKGROUND
  • Hassan C, Spadaccini M, Iannone A, Maselli R, Jovani M, Chandrasekar VT, Antonelli G, Yu H, Areia M, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Bhandari P, Sharma P, Rex DK, Rosch T, Wallace M, Repici A. Performance of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy for adenoma and polyp detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Jan;93(1):77-85.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.06.059. Epub 2020 Jun 26.

    PMID: 32598963BACKGROUND
  • Parmar R, Martel M, Rostom A, Barkun AN. Validated Scales for Colon Cleansing: A Systematic Review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Feb;111(2):197-204; quiz 205. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.417. Epub 2016 Jan 19.

    PMID: 26782820BACKGROUND
  • Parsa N, Rex DK, Byrne MF. Colorectal polyp characterization with standard endoscopy: Will Artificial Intelligence succeed where human eyes failed? Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2021 Jun-Aug;52-53:101736. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2021.101736. Epub 2021 Feb 22.

    PMID: 34172255BACKGROUND
  • Wani S, Rastogi A. Narrow-band imaging in the prediction of submucosal invasive colon cancer: how "NICE" is it? Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Oct;78(4):633-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.06.015. No abstract available.

    PMID: 24054741BACKGROUND
  • Mangas-Sanjuan C, Santana E, Cubiella J, Rodriguez-Camacho E, Seoane A, Alvarez-Gonzalez MA, Suarez A, Alvarez-Garcia V, Gonzalez N, Lue A, Cid-Gomez L, Ponce M, Bujanda L, Portillo I, Pellise M, Diez-Redondo P, Herraiz M, Ono A, Pizarro A, Zapater P, Jover R; QUALISCOPIA Study Investigators. Variation in Colonoscopy Performance Measures According to Procedure Indication. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 May;18(5):1216-1223.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.08.035. Epub 2019 Aug 22.

    PMID: 31446179BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Intestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesColonic DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesRectal Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: A high definition colonoscopy will be performed by a high experienced endoscopists. The endoscopists will be blinded to a second monitor with the Polydeep evaluation. A second observer will annotate the lesions detected during colonoscopy withdrawal and will inform the endoscopists if Polydeep detects a lesion that is not detected by the endoscopists.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 22, 2022

First Posted

August 24, 2022

Study Start

January 30, 2023

Primary Completion

March 15, 2023

Study Completion

April 11, 2023

Last Updated

February 24, 2025

Record last verified: 2022-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations