Clinical Validation of Polydeep: an Artificial Intelligence-based Computer-aided Polyp Detection (CADe) and Characterization (CADx) System
Polydeep Advance I: Prospective Diagnostic Tests Trial with a Paired Study Design
1 other identifier
interventional
205
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is a clinical validation of Polydeep, a computer-aided polyp detection (CADe) and characterization (CADx) system. Polydeep Advance 1 is an unicentric prospective diagnostic tests trial with a paired study design. The hypothesis of the study is that Polydeep, a CAD system, is more sensitive than a blinded endoscopists for the detection of colorectal polyps in a high definition colonoscopy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer
Started Jan 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 22, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 24, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 30, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 15, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 11, 2023
CompletedFebruary 24, 2025
May 1, 2022
1 month
August 22, 2022
February 21, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Sensitivity of polydeep vs high experienced endoscopist blinded to polydeep
To compare the sensitivity of Polydeep to a high experienced endoscopist for colorectal polyp detection (adenoma or serrated lesion histologically confirmed)
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Sensitivity for serrated lesions detection.
1 year
Sensitivity for adenoma detection.
1 year
Sensitivity for advanced colonic lesions
1 year
Sensitivity for diminute lesions (≤5mm)
1 year
To compare the diagnostic yield of the optical diagnosis
1 year
Study Arms (1)
Sensitivity of Polydeep vs high experienced endoscopists for colorectal polyp detection
EXPERIMENTALBoth diagnostic interventions will be performed in all patients: High definition colonoscopy and Polydeep system.
Interventions
Both diagnostic interventions will be performed in all patients 1. High definition colonoscopy performed by high experienced endoscopists blinded to Polydeep. 2. Polydeep: a CADe and CADx system. The gold standard will be the histological diagnosis of the lesion.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- First diagnostic colonoscopy performed after a positive fecal immunochemical test performed within the CRC screening program.
- Surveillance after resection of colorectal adenomas.
- Acceptance after reading the information sheet and signing the informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Colonoscopies with insufficient intestinal cleansing (Boston Bowel Preparation Scale \<6 or \<2 in any of the evaluated segments).
- Detected lesions without histologic diagnosis.
- Previous CRC
- Previous colonic resection
- Hereditary CRC syndromes
- Serrated polyposis syndrome
- Incomplete colonoscopy without cecal intubation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Fundacin Biomedica Galicia Surlead
- Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Spaincollaborator
- Ministry of Work and Welfare - Xunta de Galiciacollaborator
- Asociación Española de Gastroenterologíacollaborator
- European Regional Development Fundcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense
Ourense, Ourense, 32002, Spain
Related Publications (11)
Cubiella J, Marzo-Castillejo M, Mascort-Roca JJ, Amador-Romero FJ, Bellas-Beceiro B, Clofent-Vilaplana J, Carballal S, Ferrandiz-Santos J, Gimeno-Garcia AZ, Jover R, Mangas-Sanjuan C, Moreira L, Pellise M, Quintero E, Rodriguez-Camacho E, Vega-Villaamil P; Sociedad Espanola de Medicina de Familia y Comunitaria y Asociacion Espanola de Gastroenterologia. Clinical practice guideline. Diagnosis and prevention of colorectal cancer. 2018 Update. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Nov;41(9):585-596. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2018.07.012. Epub 2018 Sep 20. English, Spanish.
PMID: 30245076BACKGROUNDCorley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, Zhao WK, Lee JK, Doubeni CA, Zauber AG, de Boer J, Fireman BH, Schottinger JE, Quinn VP, Ghai NR, Levin TR, Quesenberry CP. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med. 2014 Apr 3;370(14):1298-306. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1309086.
PMID: 24693890BACKGROUNDZhao S, Wang S, Pan P, Xia T, Chang X, Yang X, Guo L, Meng Q, Yang F, Qian W, Xu Z, Wang Y, Wang Z, Gu L, Wang R, Jia F, Yao J, Li Z, Bai Y. Magnitude, Risk Factors, and Factors Associated With Adenoma Miss Rate of Tandem Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2019 May;156(6):1661-1674.e11. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.260. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
PMID: 30738046BACKGROUNDASGE Technology Committee; Abu Dayyeh BK, Thosani N, Konda V, Wallace MB, Rex DK, Chauhan SS, Hwang JH, Komanduri S, Manfredi M, Maple JT, Murad FM, Siddiqui UD, Banerjee S. ASGE Technology Committee systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE PIVI thresholds for adopting real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar;81(3):502.e1-502.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.022. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
PMID: 25597420BACKGROUNDPuig I, Lopez-Ceron M, Arnau A, Rosinol O, Cuatrecasas M, Herreros-de-Tejada A, Ferrandez A, Serra-Burriel M, Nogales O, Vida F, de Castro L, Lopez-Vicente J, Vega P, Alvarez-Gonzalez MA, Gonzalez-Santiago J, Hernandez-Conde M, Diez-Redondo P, Rivero-Sanchez L, Gimeno-Garcia AZ, Burgos A, Garcia-Alonso FJ, Bustamante-Balen M, Martinez-Bauer E, Penas B, Pellise M; EndoCAR group, Spanish Gastroenterological Association and the Spanish Digestive Endoscopy Society. Accuracy of the Narrow-Band Imaging International Colorectal Endoscopic Classification System in Identification of Deep Invasion in Colorectal Polyps. Gastroenterology. 2019 Jan;156(1):75-87. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Oct 6.
PMID: 30296432BACKGROUNDJin EH, Lee D, Bae JH, Kang HY, Kwak MS, Seo JY, Yang JI, Yang SY, Lim SH, Yim JY, Lim JH, Chung GE, Chung SJ, Choi JM, Han YM, Kang SJ, Lee J, Chan Kim H, Kim JS. Improved Accuracy in Optical Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps Using Convolutional Neural Networks with Visual Explanations. Gastroenterology. 2020 Jun;158(8):2169-2179.e8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.02.036. Epub 2020 Feb 29.
PMID: 32119927BACKGROUNDHassan C, Spadaccini M, Iannone A, Maselli R, Jovani M, Chandrasekar VT, Antonelli G, Yu H, Areia M, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Bhandari P, Sharma P, Rex DK, Rosch T, Wallace M, Repici A. Performance of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy for adenoma and polyp detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Jan;93(1):77-85.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.06.059. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
PMID: 32598963BACKGROUNDParmar R, Martel M, Rostom A, Barkun AN. Validated Scales for Colon Cleansing: A Systematic Review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Feb;111(2):197-204; quiz 205. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.417. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
PMID: 26782820BACKGROUNDParsa N, Rex DK, Byrne MF. Colorectal polyp characterization with standard endoscopy: Will Artificial Intelligence succeed where human eyes failed? Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2021 Jun-Aug;52-53:101736. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2021.101736. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
PMID: 34172255BACKGROUNDWani S, Rastogi A. Narrow-band imaging in the prediction of submucosal invasive colon cancer: how "NICE" is it? Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Oct;78(4):633-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.06.015. No abstract available.
PMID: 24054741BACKGROUNDMangas-Sanjuan C, Santana E, Cubiella J, Rodriguez-Camacho E, Seoane A, Alvarez-Gonzalez MA, Suarez A, Alvarez-Garcia V, Gonzalez N, Lue A, Cid-Gomez L, Ponce M, Bujanda L, Portillo I, Pellise M, Diez-Redondo P, Herraiz M, Ono A, Pizarro A, Zapater P, Jover R; QUALISCOPIA Study Investigators. Variation in Colonoscopy Performance Measures According to Procedure Indication. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 May;18(5):1216-1223.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.08.035. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
PMID: 31446179BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 22, 2022
First Posted
August 24, 2022
Study Start
January 30, 2023
Primary Completion
March 15, 2023
Study Completion
April 11, 2023
Last Updated
February 24, 2025
Record last verified: 2022-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share