NCT05512858

Brief Summary

the aim of the presented study is to explore the effectiveness of a sensory room in reducing seclusion, restraint and aggression at an acute psychiatric ward.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2022

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 25, 2022

Completed
29 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 23, 2022

Completed
5 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 28, 2022

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 25, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 25, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

August 1, 2023

Status Verified

July 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

July 25, 2022

Last Update Submit

July 29, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

psychiatric disordersensory processingsensory roomseclusionrestraintaggressionacute psychiatric ward

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Number of restrictions

    In this study, restrictions are defined as incidents of entering confinement in an isolation room and as taking additional sedative medication. The data collection for the entrance to isolation and tying rooms will be done through a tying notebook managed by the nursing staff; in the notebook, the events are recorded and signed by a doctor. Monitoring of taking the additional drug treatment will be done through the center's computerized system.

    through study completion, an average of 1 year

  • Number of aggression events

    Aggression incidents are "exceptional incidents" in the ward, an incident in which a person or an object was harmed. These events are logged in the center's computer system.

    through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Interview - qualitative measure

    after every intervention, an average of six months

  • Emptica-E4- physiological parameter (EDM)

    during the intervention, an average of six months

  • Emptica-E4- physiological parameter (PPG)

    during the intervention, an average of six months

Other Outcomes (5)

  • Clinical Global Impression (CGI)

    through study completion, an average of 1 year. Will be filled out for each participant once

  • Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)

    through study completion, an average of 1 year. Each participant will answer once

  • The Sensory Responsiveness Questionnaire Intensity Scale (SRQ-IS)

    through study completion, an average of 1 year. Each participant will answer once

  • +2 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

phase 1

NO INTERVENTION

Data on restrictions and aggression events in the department will be collected throughout the two phases, and the participants will undergo an evaluation process.

phase 2

EXPERIMENTAL

Data on restrictions and aggression events in the department will be collected throughout the two phases, and the participants will undergo an evaluation process. n addition, the subjects who participate in the intervention will wear an Empatica-E4 wristband to monitor autonomous metrics during their stay in the sensory stimulation room and will undergo a brief interview regarding their experience using the room.

Behavioral: sensory room

Interventions

sensory roomBEHAVIORAL

the room has dimmed lighting, sensing games, essential oils, picture books and cookbooks, two heavy blankets (weighing 9 kg and 11 kg), a rocking chair, and a vestibular plate. The occupational therapist will accompany the first entry into the room to create a sensory profile, adjust and instruct on the means, and write a treatment card. The treatment card will record the patient's choices and instructions for arranging the room, and it will be used by the staff members who will admit the patient as needed. Each patient will be able to stay in the room for self-treatment according to the individual treatment card prepared at the first sensory room treatment, up to half an hour.

phase 2

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 50 Years
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Hebrew language Proficiency receiving psychiatric medication of any kind regularly for at least 14 days hospitalized in full hospitalization for up to 70 days.

You may not qualify if:

  • chronic pain, neurodevelopmental syndrome active use of psychoactive substances.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Abarbanel Mental Health Center

Bat Yam, 5943601, Israel

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • Barton SA, Johnson MR, Price LV. Achieving restraint-free on an inpatient behavioral health unit. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2009 Jan;47(1):34-40. doi: 10.3928/02793695-20090101-01.

    PMID: 19227108BACKGROUND
  • Berk M, Ng F, Dodd S, Callaly T, Campbell S, Bernardo M, Trauer T. The validity of the CGI severity and improvement scales as measures of clinical effectiveness suitable for routine clinical use. J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Dec;14(6):979-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00921.x. Epub 2008 May 2.

    PMID: 18462279BACKGROUND
  • de Looff P, Noordzij ML, Moerbeek M, Nijman H, Didden R, Embregts P. Changes in heart rate and skin conductance in the 30 min preceding aggressive behavior. Psychophysiology. 2019 Oct;56(10):e13420. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13420. Epub 2019 Jun 11.

    PMID: 31184379BACKGROUND
  • Lifshitz M, Dwolatzky T, Press Y. Validation of the Hebrew version of the MoCA test as a screening instrument for the early detection of mild cognitive impairment in elderly individuals. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2012 Sep;25(3):155-61. doi: 10.1177/0891988712457047.

    PMID: 23124009BACKGROUND
  • Menghini L, Gianfranchi E, Cellini N, Patron E, Tagliabue M, Sarlo M. Stressing the accuracy: Wrist-worn wearable sensor validation over different conditions. Psychophysiology. 2019 Nov;56(11):e13441. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13441. Epub 2019 Jul 23.

    PMID: 31332802BACKGROUND
  • Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x.

    PMID: 15817019BACKGROUND
  • Salzmann-Erikson M, Yifter L. Risk Factors and Triggers That May Result in Patient-Initiated Violence on Inpatient Psychiatric Units: An Integrative Review. Clin Nurs Res. 2020 Sep;29(7):504-520. doi: 10.1177/1054773818823333. Epub 2019 Jan 22.

    PMID: 30666885BACKGROUND
  • Hedlund Lindberg M, Samuelsson M, Perseius KI, Bjorkdahl A. The experiences of patients in using sensory rooms in psychiatric inpatient care. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Aug;28(4):930-939. doi: 10.1111/inm.12593. Epub 2019 Mar 31.

    PMID: 30931543BACKGROUND
  • Chalmers A, Harrison S, Mollison K, Molloy N, Gray K. Establishing sensory-based approaches in mental health inpatient care: a multidisciplinary approach. Australas Psychiatry. 2012 Feb;20(1):35-9. doi: 10.1177/1039856211430146. Epub 2012 Jan 5.

    PMID: 22357673BACKGROUND
  • Wiglesworth S, Farnworth L. An Exploration of the Use of a Sensory Room in a Forensic Mental Health Setting: Staff and Patient Perspectives. Occup Ther Int. 2016 Sep;23(3):255-64. doi: 10.1002/oti.1428. Epub 2016 May 29.

    PMID: 27237722BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Mental DisordersAggression

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Aberrant Motor Behavior in DementiaBehavioral SymptomsBehaviorSocial Behavior

Study Officials

  • Liron Peretz, BOT

    Tel Aviv University

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Model Details: Two phases, First with no intervention (=control group), second with intervention(study group).
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 25, 2022

First Posted

August 23, 2022

Study Start

August 28, 2022

Primary Completion

June 25, 2023

Study Completion

June 25, 2023

Last Updated

August 1, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Data will be available upon personal request

Locations