NCT05512689

Brief Summary

This study was a non-blinded, non-randomized intervention study in a single-center clinical setting, analyzing ventilation quality with and without RFM visibility.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
90

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2022

Completed
8 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 18, 2022

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 23, 2022

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

November 22, 2023

Status Verified

November 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

August 18, 2022

Last Update Submit

November 19, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Proportion of ventilations with VTe between 4-8ml/kg

    percentage of ventilations within range divided through all ventilations performed, for each participant

    through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Mean value for mask leak and proportion of ventilations with excessive mask leak (defined as >50%) during all ventilations

    through study completion, an average of 1 year

  • Occurrence of insufficient tidal volume (defined as <4mL/kg) as a proportion of ventilations given (face mask and endotracheal tube)

    through study completion, an average of 1 year

  • Occurrence of excessive tidal volume (defined as >8mL/kg) as a proportion of ventilations given (face mask and endotracheal tube)

    through study completion, an average of 1 year

  • Mean value for ventilation rate (defined as ventilations per minute)

    through study completion, an average of 1 year

  • Mean value for peak inflation pressure

    through study completion, an average of 1 year

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Control group

NO INTERVENTION

In the control group, the healthcare professional ventilates the infants without any feedback about the ventilation. This represents the normal clinical setting. The RFM will be recording data on the ventilation quality.

Interventional group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In the interventional group, healthcare professionals will ventilate the infants using the RFM and are able to adapt their ventilations according to the RFM feedback.

Device: Ventilations while using a respiratory function monitor

Interventions

Healthcare professionals are able to use a feedback device to guide their ventilations.

Interventional group

Eligibility Criteria

AgeUp to 12 Months
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) and in the delivery room who receive positive pressure ventilation
  • Written consent from parents or legal guardians of patients
  • Preterm and term infants (male and female, any gestational age)

You may not qualify if:

  • \- Healthcare professionals or parents/legal guardians, representing their children, that do not consent to participation in this study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Medical University of Vienna

Vienna, 1090, Austria

Location

Study Officials

  • Michael Wagner, MD PhD

    Medical University of Vienna

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Model Details: We aimed to avoid classical randomization due to a possible learning and habituation effect from the feedback when using the RFM. We started with a phase of routine ventilation, in which the healthcare professional ventilated the infants using the RFM but did not receive any feedback about the ventilation. This represents the normal clinical setting. In the second phase, the healthcare professional then received visual feedback from the RFM during ventilations. The healthcare professional could then adjust his ventilation technique in real time.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 18, 2022

First Posted

August 23, 2022

Study Start

January 1, 2022

Primary Completion

March 1, 2023

Study Completion

March 1, 2023

Last Updated

November 22, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

IPD will not be made available to other researchers.

Locations